微创脊柱手术中的机器人导航：近期文献综述及对一项新兴技术的评论
Robotic Guidance in Minimally Invasive Spine Surgery: a Review of Recent Literature and Commentary on a Developing Technology.
作者信息
Stull Justin D, Mangan John J, Vaccaro Alexander R, Schroeder Gregory D
机构信息
Orthopaedic Surgery, Thomas Jefferson University Hospital, Fifth Floor, 925 Chestnut Street, Philadelphia, PA, 19107, USA.
The Rothman Institute, Philadelphia, PA, USA.
出版信息
Curr Rev Musculoskelet Med. 2019 Jun;12(2):245-251. doi: 10.1007/s12178-019-09558-2.
Abstract
PURPOSE OF REVIEW
Minimally invasive spine surgery (MIS) and robotic technology are growing in popularity and are increasing utilized in combination. The purpose of this review is to identify the current successes, potential drawbacks, and future directions of robotic guidance for MIS compared to traditional techniques.
RECENT FINDINGS
Recent literature highlights successful incorporation of robotic guidance in MIS as a consistently accurate method for pedicle screw placement. With a short learning curve and low complication rates, robot guidance may also reduce the use of fluoroscopy, operative time, and length of hospital stay. Recent literature suggests that incorporating robotic guidance in MIS improves the accuracy of pedicle screw insertion and may have added benefits both intra- and postoperatively for the patient and provider. Future research should focus on direct comparison between MIS with and without robotic guidance.
摘要
综述目的
微创脊柱手术（MIS）和机器人技术越来越受欢迎，并且越来越多地联合使用。本综述的目的是确定与传统技术相比，机器人辅助MIS目前的成功之处、潜在缺点及未来方向。
最新发现
近期文献强调，机器人辅助在MIS中成功应用，是椎弓根螺钉置入的一种始终准确的方法。由于学习曲线短且并发症发生率低，机器人辅助还可能减少透视的使用、手术时间和住院时间。近期文献表明，在MIS中加入机器人辅助可提高椎弓根螺钉置入的准确性，并且可能在术中和术后为患者和医护人员带来更多益处。未来的研究应聚焦于有和没有机器人辅助的MIS之间的直接比较。
相似文献
1
Robotic Guidance in Minimally Invasive Spine Surgery: a Review of Recent Literature and Commentary on a Developing Technology.
Curr Rev Musculoskelet Med. 2019 Jun;12(2):245-251. doi: 10.1007/s12178-019-09558-2.
2
Accuracy of Robot-Assisted Percutaneous Pedicle Screw Placement for Treatment of Lumbar Spondylolisthesis: A Comparative Cohort Study.
Med Sci Monit. 2019 Apr 4;25:2479-2487. doi: 10.12659/MSM.913124.
3
Assessment of pedicle screw placement accuracy, procedure time, and radiation exposure using a miniature robotic guidance system.
J Spinal Disord Tech. 2012 Jul;25(5):241-8. doi: 10.1097/BSD.0b013e318218a5ef.
4
The use of robotics in minimally invasive spine surgery.
J Spine Surg. 2019 Jun;5(Suppl 1):S31-S40. doi: 10.21037/jss.2019.04.16.
5
Accuracy of robot-guided versus freehand fluoroscopy-assisted pedicle screw insertion in thoracolumbar spinal surgery.
Neurosurg Focus. 2017 May;42(5):E14. doi: 10.3171/2017.3.FOCUS179.
6
Comparing Next-Generation Robotic Technology with 3-Dimensional Computed Tomography Navigation Technology for the Insertion of Posterior Pedicle Screws.
World Neurosurg. 2019 Mar;123:e474-e481. doi: 10.1016/j.wneu.2018.11.190. Epub 2018 Nov 27.
7
Revisions for screw malposition and clinical outcomes after robot-guided lumbar fusion for spondylolisthesis.
Neurosurg Focus. 2017 May;42(5):E12. doi: 10.3171/2017.3.FOCUS16534.
8
Pedicle screw accuracy in clinical utilization of minimally invasive navigated robot-assisted spine surgery.
J Robot Surg. 2020 Jun;14(3):409-413. doi: 10.1007/s11701-019-00994-3. Epub 2019 Jul 19.
9
Next-Generation Robotic Spine Surgery: First Report on Feasibility, Safety, and Learning Curve.
Oper Neurosurg (Hagerstown). 2019 Jul 1;17(1):61-69. doi: 10.1093/ons/opy280.
10
Robotic versus fluoroscopy-guided pedicle screw insertion for metastatic spinal disease: a matched-cohort comparison.
Neurosurg Focus. 2017 May;42(5):E13. doi: 10.3171/2017.3.FOCUS1710.
引用本文的文献
1
Percutaneous endoscopic lumbar partial laminectomy assisted by a new miniature parallel surgical robot system: a trial on a cadaveric specimen.
Wideochir Inne Tech Maloinwazyjne. 2025 Mar 24;20(1):99-105. doi: 10.20452/wiitm.2025.17935. eCollection 2025 Apr 9.
2
Performance and adaptability comparison between medical students and experienced neurosurgeons using a robotic exoscope with a head-mounted display.
J Robot Surg. 2025 Jun 12;19(1):283. doi: 10.1007/s11701-025-02430-1.
3
Robotic-Assisted Navigation in Single-Level Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion Reduces Surgeons' Mental Workload Compared With Fluoroscopic and Computed Tomographic Techniques: A Nonrandomized Prospective Controlled Trial.
HSS J. 2024 Oct 6:15563316241281064. doi: 10.1177/15563316241281064.
4
A Framework for Interpretability in Machine Learning for Medical Imaging.
IEEE Access. 2024;12:53277-53292. doi: 10.1109/access.2024.3387702. Epub 2024 Apr 11.
5
Clinical efficacy of robotic spine surgery: an updated systematic review of 20 randomized controlled trials.
EFORT Open Rev. 2023 Nov 1;8(11):841-853. doi: 10.1530/EOR-23-0125.
6
[Development of a planned and monitoring robotic assistance and automation for application in orthopedics and trauma surgery].
Chirurgie (Heidelb). 2023 Apr;94(4):312-317. doi: 10.1007/s00104-023-01844-7. Epub 2023 Feb 20.
7
Robotic-assisted spine surgery allows for increased pedicle screw sizes while still improving safety as indicated by elevated triggered electromyographic thresholds.
J Robot Surg. 2023 Jun;17(3):1007-1012. doi: 10.1007/s11701-022-01493-8. Epub 2022 Nov 30.
8
Robotic-Assisted Revision Spine Surgery.
Int J Spine Surg. 2022 Oct;16(S2):S14-S21. doi: 10.14444/8272. Epub 2022 Jun 16.
9
Robot-Guided Transforaminal Versus Robot-Guided Posterior Lumbar Interbody Fusion for Lumbar Degenerative Disease.
Neurospine. 2021 Mar;18(1):98-105. doi: 10.14245/ns.2040294.147. Epub 2020 Dec 14.
10
The safety and accuracy of robot-assisted pedicle screw internal fixation for spine disease: a meta-analysis.
Bone Joint Res. 2020 Oct 10;9(10):653-666. doi: 10.1302/2046-3758.910.BJR-2020-0064.R2. eCollection 2020 Oct.
本文引用的文献
1
A Cost-Effectiveness Analysis of the Integration of Robotic Spine Technology in Spine Surgery.
Neurospine. 2018 Sep;15(3):216-224. doi: 10.14245/ns.1836082.041. Epub 2018 Aug 29.
2
Accuracy of pedicle screw placement comparing robot-assisted technology and the free-hand with fluoroscopy-guided method in spine surgery: An updated meta-analysis.
Medicine (Baltimore). 2018 Jun;97(22):e10970. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000010970.
3
Comparative study of 1-year clinical and radiological outcomes using robot-assisted pedicle screw fixation and freehand technique in posterior lumbar interbody fusion: A prospective, randomized controlled trial.
Int J Med Robot. 2018 Aug;14(4):e1917. doi: 10.1002/rcs.1917. Epub 2018 May 22.
4
Radiographic and Clinical Outcomes of Robot-Assisted Posterior Pedicle Screw Fixation: Two-Year Results from a Randomized Controlled Trial.
Yonsei Med J. 2018 May;59(3):438-444. doi: 10.3349/ymj.2018.59.3.438.
5
Robot-assisted vs freehand pedicle screw fixation in spine surgery - a systematic review and a meta-analysis of comparative studies.
Int J Med Robot. 2018 Jun;14(3):e1892. doi: 10.1002/rcs.1892. Epub 2018 Feb 19.
6
Comparison of Accuracy of Pedicle Screw Insertion Among 4 Guided Technologies in Spine Surgery.
Med Sci Monit. 2017 Dec 16;23:5960-5968. doi: 10.12659/msm.905713.
7
Robot guidance for percutaneous minimally invasive placement of pedicle screws for pyogenic spondylodiscitis is associated with lower rates of wound breakdown compared to conventional fluoroscopy-guided instrumentation.
Neurosurg Rev. 2018 Apr;41(2):489-496. doi: 10.1007/s10143-017-0877-1. Epub 2017 Jul 20.
8
Evaluation of robot-guided minimally invasive implantation of 2067 pedicle screws.
Neurosurg Focus. 2017 May;42(5):E11. doi: 10.3171/2017.2.FOCUS16552.
9
Accuracy of robot-guided versus freehand fluoroscopy-assisted pedicle screw insertion in thoracolumbar spinal surgery.
Neurosurg Focus. 2017 May;42(5):E14. doi: 10.3171/2017.3.FOCUS179.
10
Robotic versus fluoroscopy-guided pedicle screw insertion for metastatic spinal disease: a matched-cohort comparison.
Neurosurg Focus. 2017 May;42(5):E13. doi: 10.3171/2017.3.FOCUS1710.
Zotero 插件