Center for Interstitial and Rare Lung Disease, Thoraxklinik, University of Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany.
Columbia University Medical Center, New York, NY.
Chest. 2019 Oct;156(4):706-714. doi: 10.1016/j.chest.2019.04.015. Epub 2019 Apr 29.
Angiotensin peptides have been implicated in idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis (IPF) pathogenesis. Angiotensin modulators are used to treat arterial hypertension, a frequent comorbidity of IPF. This post hoc analysis evaluated associations of antihypertensive treatments with disease-related outcomes in IPF.
All patients randomized to placebo (n = 624) in the CAPACITY and ASCEND studies were categorized by antihypertensive treatment at baseline. Outcomes of disease progression (first occurrence of ≥ 10% absolute decline in % predicted FVC, ≥ 50-m decline in 6-min walk distance, or death) and all-cause mortality were assessed over 52 weeks.
At baseline, 111 and 121 patients were receiving an angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitor (ACEi) or an angiotensin II receptor blocker (ARB), respectively; 392 were receiving neither. In multivariable analyses adjusted for differences in baseline characteristics compared with the non-ACEi/ARB group, ACEi treatment (hazard ratio [HR], 0.6 [95% CI, 0.4-0.9]; P = .026), but not ARB (HR, 0.9 [95% CI, 0.6-1.2]; P = .413), was associated with slower disease progression. Furthermore, the increase in all-cause mortality associated with cardiovascular disease was not observed in the ACEi group (HR, 1.1 [95% CI, 0.5-2.9]; P = .782), which presented a similar percentage of IPF-related mortality as the non-ACEi/ARB group (3.6% vs 3.6%). In contrast, patients in the ARB group had greater risk of all-cause mortality (HR, 2.5 [95% CI, 1.2-5.2]). These observations were validated in a pooled analysis that included patients from the INSPIRE trial.
Prospective clinical trials are needed to evaluate whether angiotensin modulators may be beneficial to clinical outcomes in IPF.
ClinicalTrials.gov; Nos.: NCT01366209, NCT00287716, NCT00287729, NCT00075998; URL: www.clinicaltrials.gov).
血管紧张素肽在特发性肺纤维化(IPF)发病机制中起作用。血管紧张素调节剂用于治疗动脉高血压,这是 IPF 的常见合并症。本事后分析评估了抗高血压治疗与 IPF 相关结局的相关性。
在 CAPACITY 和 ASCEND 研究中,所有随机分配至安慰剂的患者(n=624)根据基线时的抗高血压治疗进行分类。疾病进展(首次出现预测 FVC 绝对值下降≥10%、6 分钟步行距离下降≥50 米或死亡)和全因死亡率的结局在 52 周内进行评估。
基线时,分别有 111 例和 121 例患者正在接受血管紧张素转换酶抑制剂(ACEi)或血管紧张素 II 受体阻滞剂(ARB)治疗;392 例患者均未接受治疗。在与非 ACEi/ARB 组相比,根据基线特征差异进行多变量分析后,ACEi 治疗(风险比 [HR],0.6 [95%CI,0.4-0.9];P=0.026),但 ARB 治疗(HR,0.9 [95%CI,0.6-1.2];P=0.413)与疾病进展较慢相关。此外,ACEi 组未观察到心血管疾病相关全因死亡率增加(HR,1.1 [95%CI,0.5-2.9];P=0.782),ACEi 组与非 ACEi/ARB 组的 IPF 相关死亡率相似(3.6%与 3.6%)。相比之下,ARB 组的全因死亡率风险更高(HR,2.5 [95%CI,1.2-5.2])。在包括 INSPIRE 试验患者的汇总分析中验证了这些观察结果。
需要前瞻性临床试验来评估血管紧张素调节剂是否可能有益于 IPF 的临床结局。
ClinicalTrials.gov;编号:NCT01366209、NCT00287716、NCT00287729、NCT00075998;网址:www.clinicaltrials.gov)。