Department of Psychology, University of California, Berkeley, USA.
Department of Psychology, San Francisco State University, San Francisco, USA.
Cogn Emot. 2020 Mar;34(2):242-261. doi: 10.1080/02699931.2019.1611544. Epub 2019 May 6.
Emotion regulation choices are known to be profoundly consequential across affective, cognitive, and social domains. Prior studies have identified two important external factors of emotion regulation choice: stimulus intensity and reappraisal affordances. However, whether there are other external factors of emotion regulation choice and how these factors contribute to emotion regulation choice when considered simultaneously is not yet clear. The current studies addressed these gaps by examining the relations between emotion regulation choice (distraction vs. reappraisal) and self-reported stimulus intensity, reappraisal affordances, and several other factors including discrete emotions and distraction affordances. Across three studies using different databases of standardised images to enhance generalizability, our results showed that in the context of our experiments, reappraisal affordances were strongly associated with emotion regulation choice (greater reappraisal affordances predicted higher use of reappraisal). Further, stimulus intensity was independently associated with emotion regulation choice in each study. Our results also demonstrated that the discrete emotion of disgust (but not other discrete emotions) is a previously unidentified external factor of emotion regulation choice. We discuss the implications of the current findings.
情绪调节选择在情感、认知和社会领域都有着深远的影响。先前的研究已经确定了情绪调节选择的两个重要外部因素:刺激强度和再评价可及性。然而,是否存在其他外部因素影响情绪调节选择,以及当这些因素同时被考虑时,它们如何影响情绪调节选择,目前还不清楚。本研究通过考察情绪调节选择(分心与再评价)与自我报告的刺激强度、再评价可及性以及其他几个因素(包括离散情绪和分心可及性)之间的关系,填补了这些空白。通过使用不同的标准化图像数据库进行的三项研究,增强了结果的可推广性,我们的研究结果表明,在我们的实验情境中,再评价可及性与情绪调节选择密切相关(再评价可及性越高,越倾向于使用再评价)。此外,在每项研究中,刺激强度都与情绪调节选择独立相关。我们的研究结果还表明,厌恶感(而不是其他离散情绪)是情绪调节选择的一个以前未被识别的外部因素。我们讨论了当前研究结果的意义。