Department of Psychiatry, Division of Behavioral Medicine, Columbia University Irving Medical Center, New York, NY, 10032, USA.
Department of Psychology, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA, 15260, USA.
Psychoneuroendocrinology. 2019 Sep;107:82-92. doi: 10.1016/j.psyneuen.2019.05.001. Epub 2019 May 7.
We have previously found that acute psychological stress may affect mitochondria and trigger an increase in serum mitochondrial DNA, known as circulating cell-free mtDNA (ccf-mtDNA). Similar to other stress reactivity measures, there are substantial unexplained inter-individual differences in the magnitude of ccf-mtDNA reactivity, as well as within-person differences across different occasions of testing. Here, we sought to identify psychological and physiological predictors of ccf-mtDNA reactivity using machine learning-based multivariate classifiers.
We used data from serum ccf-mtDNA concentration measured pre- and post-stress in 46 healthy midlife adults tested on two separate occasions. To identify variables predicting the magnitude of ccf-mtDNA reactivity, two multivariate classification models, partial least-squares discriminant analysis (PLS-DA) and random forest (RF), were trained to discriminate between high and low ccf-mtDNA responders. Potential predictors used in the models included state variables such as physiological measures and affective states, and trait variables such as sex and personality measures. Variables identified across both models were considered to be predictors of ccf-mtDNA reactivity and selected for downstream analyses.
Identified predictors were significantly enriched for state over trait measures (X = 7.03; p = 0.008) and for physiological over psychological measures (X = 4.36; p = 0.04). High responders were more likely to be male (X = 26.95; p < 0.001) and differed from low-responders on baseline cardiovascular and autonomic measures, and on stress-induced reduction in fatigue (Cohen's d = 0.38-0.73). These group-level findings also accurately accounted for within-person differences in 90% of cases.
These results suggest that acute cardiovascular and psychological indices, rather than stable individual traits, predict stress-induced ccf-mtDNA reactivity. This work provides a proof-of-concept that machine learning approaches can be used to explore determinants of inter-individual and within-person differences in stress psychophysiology.
我们之前发现急性心理应激可能会影响线粒体并引发血清线粒体 DNA 增加,即循环无细胞 mtDNA(ccf-mtDNA)。与其他应激反应性测量类似,ccf-mtDNA 反应性的个体间差异很大,并且在不同的测试场合中个体内也存在差异。在这里,我们试图使用基于机器学习的多元分类器来确定 ccf-mtDNA 反应性的心理和生理预测因子。
我们使用了 46 名健康中年成年人在两次单独测试中测量的应激前后血清 ccf-mtDNA 浓度的数据。为了确定预测 ccf-mtDNA 反应性幅度的变量,我们使用偏最小二乘判别分析(PLS-DA)和随机森林(RF)两种多元分类模型来区分高和低 ccf-mtDNA 反应者。模型中使用的潜在预测因子包括生理测量和情感状态等状态变量,以及性别和人格测量等特质变量。跨两个模型识别出的变量被认为是 ccf-mtDNA 反应性的预测因子,并被选用于下游分析。
鉴定出的预测因子在状态测量上显著多于特质测量(X=7.03;p=0.008),在生理测量上显著多于心理测量(X=4.36;p=0.04)。高反应者更有可能是男性(X=26.95;p<0.001),与低反应者在基线心血管和自主测量以及应激诱导的疲劳减轻方面存在差异(Cohen's d=0.38-0.73)。这些群体水平的发现也准确地解释了 90%的个体内差异。
这些结果表明,急性心血管和心理指标而不是稳定的个体特质,可预测应激诱导的 ccf-mtDNA 反应性。这项工作提供了一个概念验证,即机器学习方法可用于探索应激心理生理学中个体间和个体内差异的决定因素。