Suppr超能文献

乳腺密度通知法对补充性乳腺成像和乳腺活检的影响。

The Impact of Breast Density Notification Laws on Supplemental Breast Imaging and Breast Biopsy.

机构信息

Department of Public Health Sciences, The University of Chicago, Chicago, IL, USA.

Division of Women's Health, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, MA, USA.

出版信息

J Gen Intern Med. 2019 Aug;34(8):1441-1451. doi: 10.1007/s11606-019-05026-2. Epub 2019 May 29.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Dense breast tissue increases breast cancer risk and lowers mammography sensitivity, but the value of supplemental imaging for dense breasts remains uncertain. Since 2009, 37 states and Washington DC have passed legislation requiring patient notification about breast density.

OBJECTIVE

Examine the effects of state breast density notification laws on use of supplemental breast imaging and breast biopsies.

DESIGN

Difference-in-differences analysis of supplemental imaging and biopsies before and after notification laws in 12 states enacting breast density notification laws from 2009 to 2014 and 12 matched control states. Supplemental imaging/biopsy within 6 months following an index mammogram were evaluated during four time periods related to legislation: (1) 6 months before, (2) 0-6 months after, (3) 6-12 months after, and (4) 12-18 months after.

PARTICIPANTS

Women ages 40-64 years receiving an initial mammogram in a state that passed a breast density notification law or a control state.

INTERVENTION

Mandatory breast density notification following an index mammogram.

MAIN MEASURES

Use of breast biopsies and supplemental breast imaging (breast ultrasound, tomosynthesis, magnetic resonance imaging, scintimammography, and thermography), overall and by specific test.

KEY RESULTS

Supplemental breast imaging and biopsy increased modestly in states with notification laws and changed minimally in control states. Adjusted rates of supplemental imaging and biopsy within 6 months of mammography before legislation were 8.5% and 3.1%, respectively. Compared with pre-legislation in intervention and control states, legislation was associated with adjusted difference-in-differences estimates of + 1.3% (p < 0.0001) and + 0.4% (p < 0.0001) for supplemental imaging and biopsies, respectively, in the 6-12 months after the law and difference-in-differences estimates of + 3.3% (p < 0.0001) and + 0.8% (p < 0.0001) for supplemental imaging and biopsies, respectively, 12-18 months after the law.

CONCLUSIONS

As breast density notification laws are considered, policymakers and clinicians should expect increases in breast imaging/biopsies. Additional research is needed on these laws' effects on cost and patient outcomes.

摘要

背景

致密乳腺组织会增加乳腺癌风险并降低乳房 X 光检查的敏感度,但对于致密乳腺的补充性影像学检查的价值仍不确定。自 2009 年以来,37 个州和华盛顿特区已通过立法,要求告知患者有关乳腺密度的信息。

目的

研究州级乳腺密度通知法对补充性乳腺影像学检查和乳腺活检的影响。

设计

对 2009 年至 2014 年期间 12 个实施乳腺密度通知法的州和 12 个匹配的对照州,在通知法颁布前后进行补充性影像学检查和活检的差异-差异分析。在与立法相关的四个时间段内,对索引乳房 X 光检查后 6 个月内的补充性成像/活检进行评估:(1) 立法前 6 个月;(2) 索引乳房 X 光检查后 0-6 个月;(3) 索引乳房 X 光检查后 6-12 个月;(4) 索引乳房 X 光检查后 12-18 个月。

参与者

在实施乳腺密度通知法的州或对照州接受初始乳房 X 光检查的 40-64 岁女性。

干预措施

在索引乳房 X 光检查后实施强制性乳腺密度通知。

主要观察指标

总体及按特定检查进行的乳腺活检和补充性乳腺影像学检查(乳腺超声、断层合成、磁共振成像、闪烁乳腺成像和热成像)的使用情况。

主要结果

通知法实施后,乳腺补充性影像学检查和活检的数量略有增加,而在对照州变化不大。在立法前的 6 个月内,乳腺 X 光检查后的补充性成像和活检的调整后比率分别为 8.5%和 3.1%。与干预组和对照组的立法前相比,在立法后 6-12 个月,该法与补充性成像和活检的调整后差异估计值分别为+1.3%(p<0.0001)和+0.4%(p<0.0001),在立法后 12-18 个月,该法与补充性成像和活检的调整后差异估计值分别为+3.3%(p<0.0001)和+0.8%(p<0.0001)。

结论

在考虑实施乳腺密度通知法时,政策制定者和临床医生应预计乳腺影像学检查/活检的数量会增加。还需要进一步研究这些法律对成本和患者结局的影响。

相似文献

1
The Impact of Breast Density Notification Laws on Supplemental Breast Imaging and Breast Biopsy.
J Gen Intern Med. 2019 Aug;34(8):1441-1451. doi: 10.1007/s11606-019-05026-2. Epub 2019 May 29.
2
3
Supplemental Breast Imaging Utilization After Breast Density Legislation in North Carolina.
J Am Coll Radiol. 2020 Jan;17(1 Pt A):6-14. doi: 10.1016/j.jacr.2019.05.054. Epub 2019 Jul 1.
5
The impact of mandatory mammographic breast density notification on supplemental screening practice in the United States: a systematic review.
Breast Cancer Res Treat. 2021 May;187(1):11-30. doi: 10.1007/s10549-021-06203-w. Epub 2021 Mar 28.
6
Association of State Dense Breast Notification Laws With Supplemental Testing and Cancer Detection After Screening Mammography.
Am J Public Health. 2019 May;109(5):762-767. doi: 10.2105/AJPH.2019.304967. Epub 2019 Mar 21.
7
The Effect of California's Breast Density Notification Legislation on Breast Cancer Screening.
J Prim Care Community Health. 2017 Apr;8(2):55-62. doi: 10.1177/2150131916674889. Epub 2016 Oct 31.
8
Dense Breast Notification Laws, Education, and Women's Awareness and Knowledge of Breast Density: a Nationally Representative Survey.
J Gen Intern Med. 2020 Jul;35(7):1940-1945. doi: 10.1007/s11606-019-05590-7. Epub 2020 Jan 8.
9
Screening Breast Ultrasound: Update After 10 Years of Breast Density Notification Laws.
AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2020 Jun;214(6):1424-1435. doi: 10.2214/AJR.19.22275. Epub 2020 Mar 17.

引用本文的文献

1
Advances in breast cancer diagnosis: a comprehensive review of imaging, biosensors, and emerging wearable technologies.
Front Oncol. 2025 Jun 18;15:1587517. doi: 10.3389/fonc.2025.1587517. eCollection 2025.
2
Can Scintimammography Help Differentiate the Nature of Suspected Masses Identified in Breast Ultrasound among Young Patients?
World J Nucl Med. 2025 Mar 9;24(2):155-160. doi: 10.1055/s-0045-1805044. eCollection 2025 Jun.
3
Changes to the US Preventive Services Task Force Screening Guidelines and Incidence of Breast Cancer.
JAMA Netw Open. 2024 Dec 2;7(12):e2452688. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2024.52688.
4
Supplemental breast cancer screening after negative mammography in US women with dense breasts.
J Natl Cancer Inst. 2025 Jun 1;117(6):1271-1275. doi: 10.1093/jnci/djae272.
5
Breast cancer risk characteristics of women undergoing whole-breast ultrasound screening versus mammography alone.
Cancer. 2023 Aug 15;129(16):2456-2468. doi: 10.1002/cncr.34768. Epub 2023 Jun 12.
6
Health Economics Research in Cancer Screening: Research Opportunities, Challenges, and Future Directions.
J Natl Cancer Inst Monogr. 2022 Jul 5;2022(59):42-50. doi: 10.1093/jncimonographs/lgac008.
8
Identifying women with increased risk of breast cancer and implementing risk-reducing strategies and supplemental imaging.
Breast Cancer. 2022 Jan;29(1):19-29. doi: 10.1007/s12282-021-01298-x. Epub 2021 Oct 19.
9
Deep Learning-Based Artificial Intelligence for Mammography.
Korean J Radiol. 2021 Aug;22(8):1225-1239. doi: 10.3348/kjr.2020.1210. Epub 2021 May 4.
10
The impact of mandatory mammographic breast density notification on supplemental screening practice in the United States: a systematic review.
Breast Cancer Res Treat. 2021 May;187(1):11-30. doi: 10.1007/s10549-021-06203-w. Epub 2021 Mar 28.

本文引用的文献

1
Dense Breast Notification Laws: Impact on Downstream Imaging After Screening Mammography.
Med Care Res Rev. 2020 Apr;77(2):143-154. doi: 10.1177/1077558717751941. Epub 2018 Jan 19.
2
Breast Density Notification Legislation and Breast Cancer Stage at Diagnosis: Early Evidence from the SEER Registry.
J Gen Intern Med. 2017 Jun;32(6):603-609. doi: 10.1007/s11606-016-3904-y. Epub 2016 Nov 14.
4
Current Status of Supplemental Screening in Dense Breasts.
J Clin Oncol. 2016 Jun 1;34(16):1840-1843. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2015.65.8674. Epub 2016 Mar 9.
6
Rates of BRCA1/2 mutation testing among young survivors of breast cancer.
Breast Cancer Res Treat. 2016 Jan;155(1):165-73. doi: 10.1007/s10549-015-3658-y. Epub 2015 Dec 26.
7
Tomosynthesis for breast cancer screening.
Clin Imaging. 2016 Mar-Apr;40(2):283-7. doi: 10.1016/j.clinimag.2015.09.014. Epub 2015 Sep 24.
8
Mammography rates 3 years after the 2009 US Preventive Services Task Force Guidelines changes.
J Clin Oncol. 2015 Mar 20;33(9):1067-74. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2014.56.9848. Epub 2015 Feb 9.
10
Impact of Henda's law on the utilization of screening breast magnetic resonance imaging.
Proc (Bayl Univ Med Cent). 2015 Jan;28(1):7-9. doi: 10.1080/08998280.2015.11929171.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验