Suppr超能文献

同种异体血小板凝胶水凝胶治疗慢性伤口的再生:一项前瞻性研究。

REGENERATION OF CHRONIC WOUNDS WITH ALLOGENEIC PLATELET GEL HYDROGEL TREATMENT: A PROSPECTIVE STUDY.

作者信息

Semenič Danijela, Cirman Tina, Rožman Primož, Smrke Dragica Maja

机构信息

1Department of Surgical Infections, University Medical Centre Ljubljana, Ljubljana, Slovenia; 2Blood Transfusion Centre of Slovenia, Ljubljana, Slovenia.

出版信息

Acta Clin Croat. 2018 Sep;57(3):434-442. doi: 10.20471/acc.2018.57.03.05.

Abstract
  • The aim of the study was to evaluate the efficacy and safety of the new method of platelet-rich plasma activation in the form of platelet gel, used in the treatment of non-healing chronic lower leg ulcers. The study was prospectively randomized, double blind and placebo controlled. We treated 60 patients (42 males and 18 females, mean age 69.43 years, SD 14.74) with chronic lower leg ulcers of different etiologies. Thirty patients were treated with allogeneic platelet gel and 30 with hydrogel. Both groups were comparable for duration of ulcer and its size. Treatment was repeated once a week for three consecutive weeks and then the last examination was scheduled at 6 months of the first platelet gel application. The t-test was used to analyze independent samples. Healing of chronic wounds with platelet gel was statistically significantly more effective compared to the treatment with hydrogel (p<0.05). At 6 months of platelet gel application, the mean wound area in the experimental group decreased to 35.01% (SD 53.69) of the initial wound size. In the control group, the wound area decreased to 89.95% (SD 71.82) of the initial wound size (p=0.001). The circumference of the wounds diminished to 54.62% (SD 39.85) of the initial value in the experimental group, compared to 91.28% (SD 29.32) in the control group (p<0.001). Allogeneic platelet gel prepared by the new method used in this study was found to be a good treatment option for non-healing chronic wounds when other methods are ineffective.
摘要

本研究旨在评估以血小板凝胶形式存在的富血小板血浆激活新方法用于治疗不愈合慢性小腿溃疡的疗效和安全性。该研究为前瞻性随机、双盲且安慰剂对照试验。我们治疗了60例不同病因的慢性小腿溃疡患者(42例男性和18例女性,平均年龄69.43岁,标准差14.74)。30例患者接受同种异体血小板凝胶治疗,30例接受水凝胶治疗。两组在溃疡持续时间及其大小方面具有可比性。治疗每周重复一次,连续三周,然后在首次应用血小板凝胶6个月时安排最后一次检查。采用t检验分析独立样本。与水凝胶治疗相比,血小板凝胶治疗慢性伤口在统计学上显著更有效(p<0.05)。在应用血小板凝胶6个月时,实验组的平均伤口面积降至初始伤口大小的35.01%(标准差53.69)。在对照组中,伤口面积降至初始伤口大小的89.95%(标准差71.82)(p = 0.001)。实验组伤口周长降至初始值的54.62%(标准差39.85),而对照组为91.28%(标准差29.32)(p<0.001)。当其他方法无效时,本研究中使用新方法制备的同种异体血小板凝胶被发现是治疗不愈合慢性伤口的良好选择。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/269a/6536287/502fa93f998d/acc-57-434-f1.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验