Luise Diana, Lauridsen Charlotte, Bosi Paolo, Trevisi Paolo
1Department of Agricultural and Food Sciences (DISTAL), Alma Mater Studiorum - University of Bologna, Bologna, Italy.
2Faculty of Science and Technology, Department of Animal Science, Aarhus University, Tjele, Denmark.
J Anim Sci Biotechnol. 2019 Jun 13;10:53. doi: 10.1186/s40104-019-0352-7. eCollection 2019.
The enterotoxigenic (ETEC) expressing F4 and F18 fimbriae are the two main pathogens associated with post-weaning diarrhea (PWD) in piglets. The growing global concern regarding antimicrobial resistance (AMR) has encouraged research into the development of nutritional and feeding strategies as well as vaccination protocols in order to counteract the PWD due to ETEC. A valid approach to researching effective strategies is to implement piglet challenge models with ETEC infection. Thus, the proper application and standardization of ETEC F4 and F18 challenge models represent an urgent priority. The current review provides an overview regarding the current piglet ETEC F4 and F18 challenge models; it highlights the key points for setting the challenge protocols and the most important indicators which should be included in research studies to verify the effectiveness of the ETEC challenge. Based on the current review, it is recommended that the setting of the model correctly assesses the choice and preconditioning of pigs, and the timing and dosage of the ETEC inoculation. Furthermore, the evaluation of the ETEC challenge response should include both clinical parameters (such as the occurrence of diarrhea, rectal temperature and bacterial fecal shedding) and biomarkers for the specific expression of ETEC F4/F18 (such as antibody production, specific F4/F18 immunoglobulins (Igs), ETEC F4/F18 fecal enumeration and analysis of the F4/F18 receptors expression in the intestinal brush borders). On the basis of the review, the piglets' response upon F4 or F18 inoculation differed in terms of the timing and intensity of the diarrhea development, on ETEC fecal shedding and in the piglets' immunological antibody response. This information was considered to be relevant to correctly define the experimental protocol, the data recording and the sample collections. Appropriate challenge settings and evaluation of the response parameters will allow future research studies to comply with the replacement, reduction and refinement (3R) approach, and to be able to evaluate the efficiency of a given feeding, nutritional or vaccination intervention in order to combat ETEC infection.
表达F4和F18菌毛的产肠毒素大肠杆菌(ETEC)是与仔猪断奶后腹泻(PWD)相关的两种主要病原体。全球对抗菌素耐药性(AMR)的日益关注促使人们开展研究,以开发营养和饲养策略以及疫苗接种方案,以应对由ETEC引起的PWD。研究有效策略的一个有效方法是实施ETEC感染的仔猪攻毒模型。因此,ETEC F4和F18攻毒模型的正确应用和标准化是当务之急。本综述概述了当前的仔猪ETEC F4和F18攻毒模型;强调了设定攻毒方案的关键点以及研究中应纳入的最重要指标,以验证ETEC攻毒的有效性。基于当前的综述,建议模型的设定应正确评估猪的选择和预处理,以及ETEC接种的时间和剂量。此外,对ETEC攻毒反应的评估应包括临床参数(如腹泻的发生、直肠温度和粪便细菌排出)以及ETEC F4/F18特异性表达的生物标志物(如抗体产生、特异性F4/F18免疫球蛋白(Igs)、ETEC F4/F18粪便计数以及肠道刷状缘中F4/F18受体表达的分析)。根据综述,仔猪在接种F4或F18后的反应在腹泻发展的时间和强度、ETEC粪便排出以及仔猪免疫抗体反应方面存在差异。这些信息被认为与正确定义实验方案、数据记录和样本采集相关。适当的攻毒设定和反应参数评估将使未来的研究能够遵循替代、减少和优化(3R)方法,并能够评估给定的喂养方式、营养或疫苗接种干预措施对抗ETEC感染的效率。