Personal Social Services Research Unit (PSSRU), London School of Economics and Political Science, London, UK.
Department of Health Policy, London School of Economics and Political Science, London, UK.
BMJ Open. 2019 Jun 19;9(6):e027851. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2018-027851.
There are more people living with dementia in low- and middle-income countries (LMICs) than in high-income countries. Evidence-based interventions to improve the lives of people living with dementia and their carers are needed, but a systematic mapping of methodologically robust studies in LMICs and synthesis of the effectiveness of dementia interventions in these settings is missing.
A systematic review and meta-analysis will be conducted to answer the question: Which dementia interventions were shown to be effective in LMICs and how do they compare to each other? Electronic database searches (MEDLINE, EMBASE, PsycINFO, CINAHL Plus, Global Health, WHO Global Index Medicus, Virtual Health Library, Cochrane CENTRAL, Social Care Online, BASE, MODEM Toolkit, Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews) will be complemented by hand searching of reference lists and local knowledge of existing studies from an international network of researchers in dementia from LMICs. Studies will be eligible for inclusion if they were published between 2008 and 2018, conducted in LMICs and evaluated the effectiveness of a dementia intervention using a study design that supports causal inference of the treatment effect. We will include both randomised and non-randomised studies due to an anticipated low number of well-conducted randomised trials in LMICs and potentially greater external validity of non-randomised studies conducted in routine care settings. In addition to narrative synthesis of the interventions, feasibility of pairwise and network meta-analyses will be explored to obtain pooled effects of relative treatment effects.
Secondary analysis of published studies, therefore no ethics approval required. Planned dissemination channels include a peer-reviewed publication as well as a website, DVD and evidence summaries.
CRD42018106206.
中低收入国家(LMICs)的痴呆症患者比高收入国家多。需要针对改善痴呆症患者及其照护者生活的循证干预措施,但缺乏针对 LMICs 的方法学稳健研究的系统制图和对这些环境中痴呆症干预措施的有效性的综合分析。
将进行系统评价和荟萃分析,以回答以下问题:在 LMICs 中,哪些痴呆症干预措施被证明是有效的,它们彼此之间的比较如何?电子数据库搜索(MEDLINE、EMBASE、PsycINFO、CINAHL Plus、全球健康、世界卫生组织全球医学索引、虚拟健康图书馆、Cochrane 中心、社会护理在线、BASE、MODEM 工具包、Cochrane 系统评价数据库)将辅以手检参考列表和来自中低收入国家痴呆症国际研究网络的现有研究的本地知识。如果研究在 2008 年至 2018 年期间发表,在 LMICs 中进行,并使用支持治疗效果因果推断的研究设计评估痴呆症干预措施的有效性,则研究将有资格被纳入。由于预计在 LMICs 中进行的精心设计的随机试验数量较少,并且在常规护理环境中进行的非随机试验可能具有更高的外部有效性,因此我们将同时纳入随机和非随机试验。除了对干预措施进行叙述性综合外,还将探索进行成对和网络荟萃分析的可行性,以获得相对治疗效果的汇总效果。
这是对已发表研究的二次分析,因此不需要伦理批准。计划的传播渠道包括同行评议的出版物以及网站、DVD 和证据摘要。
PROSPERO 注册号:CRD42018106206。