Suppr超能文献

干预措施在中低收入国家治疗痴呆的效果:系统评价、成对比较和网络荟萃分析方案。

Effectiveness of interventions for dementia in low- and middle-income countries: protocol for a systematic review, pairwise and network meta-analysis.

机构信息

Personal Social Services Research Unit (PSSRU), London School of Economics and Political Science, London, UK.

Department of Health Policy, London School of Economics and Political Science, London, UK.

出版信息

BMJ Open. 2019 Jun 19;9(6):e027851. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2018-027851.

Abstract

INTRODUCTION

There are more people living with dementia in low- and middle-income countries (LMICs) than in high-income countries. Evidence-based interventions to improve the lives of people living with dementia and their carers are needed, but a systematic mapping of methodologically robust studies in LMICs and synthesis of the effectiveness of dementia interventions in these settings is missing.

METHODS AND ANALYSIS

A systematic review and meta-analysis will be conducted to answer the question: Which dementia interventions were shown to be effective in LMICs and how do they compare to each other? Electronic database searches (MEDLINE, EMBASE, PsycINFO, CINAHL Plus, Global Health, WHO Global Index Medicus, Virtual Health Library, Cochrane CENTRAL, Social Care Online, BASE, MODEM Toolkit, Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews) will be complemented by hand searching of reference lists and local knowledge of existing studies from an international network of researchers in dementia from LMICs. Studies will be eligible for inclusion if they were published between 2008 and 2018, conducted in LMICs and evaluated the effectiveness of a dementia intervention using a study design that supports causal inference of the treatment effect. We will include both randomised and non-randomised studies due to an anticipated low number of well-conducted randomised trials in LMICs and potentially greater external validity of non-randomised studies conducted in routine care settings. In addition to narrative synthesis of the interventions, feasibility of pairwise and network meta-analyses will be explored to obtain pooled effects of relative treatment effects.

ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION

Secondary analysis of published studies, therefore no ethics approval required. Planned dissemination channels include a peer-reviewed publication as well as a website, DVD and evidence summaries.

PROSPERO REGISTRATION NUMBER

CRD42018106206.

摘要

简介

中低收入国家(LMICs)的痴呆症患者比高收入国家多。需要针对改善痴呆症患者及其照护者生活的循证干预措施,但缺乏针对 LMICs 的方法学稳健研究的系统制图和对这些环境中痴呆症干预措施的有效性的综合分析。

方法和分析

将进行系统评价和荟萃分析,以回答以下问题:在 LMICs 中,哪些痴呆症干预措施被证明是有效的,它们彼此之间的比较如何?电子数据库搜索(MEDLINE、EMBASE、PsycINFO、CINAHL Plus、全球健康、世界卫生组织全球医学索引、虚拟健康图书馆、Cochrane 中心、社会护理在线、BASE、MODEM 工具包、Cochrane 系统评价数据库)将辅以手检参考列表和来自中低收入国家痴呆症国际研究网络的现有研究的本地知识。如果研究在 2008 年至 2018 年期间发表,在 LMICs 中进行,并使用支持治疗效果因果推断的研究设计评估痴呆症干预措施的有效性,则研究将有资格被纳入。由于预计在 LMICs 中进行的精心设计的随机试验数量较少,并且在常规护理环境中进行的非随机试验可能具有更高的外部有效性,因此我们将同时纳入随机和非随机试验。除了对干预措施进行叙述性综合外,还将探索进行成对和网络荟萃分析的可行性,以获得相对治疗效果的汇总效果。

伦理和传播

这是对已发表研究的二次分析,因此不需要伦理批准。计划的传播渠道包括同行评议的出版物以及网站、DVD 和证据摘要。

PROSPERO 注册号:CRD42018106206。

相似文献

2
Systemic pharmacological treatments for chronic plaque psoriasis: a network meta-analysis.
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2021 Apr 19;4(4):CD011535. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD011535.pub4.
3
Antidepressants for pain management in adults with chronic pain: a network meta-analysis.
Health Technol Assess. 2024 Oct;28(62):1-155. doi: 10.3310/MKRT2948.
5
Systemic pharmacological treatments for chronic plaque psoriasis: a network meta-analysis.
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2017 Dec 22;12(12):CD011535. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD011535.pub2.
6
Systemic pharmacological treatments for chronic plaque psoriasis: a network meta-analysis.
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2022 May 23;5(5):CD011535. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD011535.pub5.
7
Interventions to improve access to cataract surgical services and their impact on equity in low- and middle-income countries.
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2017 Nov 9;11(11):CD011307. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD011307.pub2.
8
Home treatment for mental health problems: a systematic review.
Health Technol Assess. 2001;5(15):1-139. doi: 10.3310/hta5150.
9
Interventions for promoting habitual exercise in people living with and beyond cancer.
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2018 Sep 19;9(9):CD010192. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD010192.pub3.

引用本文的文献

2
Biomarkers of neurodegeneration across the Global South.
Lancet Healthy Longev. 2024 Oct;5(10):100616. doi: 10.1016/S2666-7568(24)00132-6. Epub 2024 Oct 3.
3
Management Practice and Clinical Outcomes of Dementia in Sub-Saharan Africa: A Systematic Review.
Behav Neurol. 2023 Jul 25;2023:2307443. doi: 10.1155/2023/2307443. eCollection 2023.
5
Care of Older Persons in Eastern Africa: A Scoping Review of Ethical Issues.
Front Public Health. 2022 Jul 6;10:923097. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2022.923097. eCollection 2022.
6
Dementia caregiving across Latin America and the Caribbean and brain health diplomacy.
Lancet Healthy Longev. 2021 Apr;2(4):e222-e231. doi: 10.1016/s2666-7568(21)00031-3. Epub 2021 Mar 31.

本文引用的文献

2
Dementia prevention, intervention, and care.
Lancet. 2017 Dec 16;390(10113):2673-2734. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(17)31363-6. Epub 2017 Jul 20.
4
Quasi-experimental study designs series-paper 9: collecting data from quasi-experimental studies.
J Clin Epidemiol. 2017 Sep;89:77-83. doi: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2017.02.013. Epub 2017 Mar 29.
9
A basic introduction to fixed-effect and random-effects models for meta-analysis.
Res Synth Methods. 2010 Apr;1(2):97-111. doi: 10.1002/jrsm.12. Epub 2010 Nov 21.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验