a Department of Chemistry, Biology and Biotechnology, University of Perugia , Perugia , Italy.
b Department of Science and Environment, Roskilde University , Roskilde , Denmark.
J Toxicol Environ Health A. 2019;82(10):616-625. doi: 10.1080/15287394.2019.1633451. Epub 2019 Jun 24.
A growing interest in developing and commercialization of new eco-friendly plastic polymers is occurring attributed to the impact of marine plastics debris and microplastics that result from the degradation of oil-based polymers as these substances adversely affect ecosystem health. Recently, polyhydroxybutyrate (PHB) has become of interest due to its biodegradability and physicochemical properties. However, biological consequences resulting from bioplastics exposure remain to be determined. Further, few data are apparently available regarding the potential for bioplastics to act as a vector for exogenous chemicals in the environment. The aim of the study was to compare the effects of polyethylene (PE MPs) and polyhydroxybutyrate (PHB MPs) microplastics administered alone or in combination with fluoranthene (Flu) on detoxifying enzymes in digestive glands and gills of . Blue mussels were exposed for 96h to eight experimental groups: control, Flu-only, PE MPs-only, PHB MPs-only, PE MPs-Flu co-exposure, PHB MPs-Flu co-exposure, Flu-incubated PE MPs, and Flu-incubated PHB MPs. Activities of superoxide dismutase (SOD), catalase (CAT), glutathione peroxidases (GPx), glutathione S-transferase (GST), and glutathione reductase (GR) were found to be significantly susceptible to Flu and plastics in both tissues. Interestingly, a single exposure to PHB MPs led to decreased activity levels of CAT and GST in gills, SOD in digestive glands and SeGPx in both tissues. In co-exposure and incubation treatments, biochemical responses were generally comparable with those exerted by PE MPs or PHB MPs only, suggesting an apparent absence of combined effects of microplastics with the pollutant. Data demonstrated the ecotoxicological impact of bioplastics materials on digestive glands and gills of .
人们对开发和商业化新型环保塑料聚合物的兴趣日益浓厚,这归因于海洋塑料碎片和微塑料的影响,这些碎片和微塑料是石油基聚合物降解的结果,因为这些物质会对生态系统健康造成不利影响。最近,由于聚羟基丁酸酯(PHB)具有生物降解性和物理化学性质,因此引起了人们的关注。然而,生物塑料暴露所产生的生物学后果仍有待确定。此外,关于生物塑料是否有可能成为环境中外源化学物质的载体,显然几乎没有数据。本研究的目的是比较单独或与荧蒽(Flu)一起施用的聚乙烯(PE MPs)和聚羟基丁酸酯(PHB MPs)微塑料对贻贝消化腺和鳃中解毒酶的影响。贻贝暴露于 96 小时,共分为 8 个实验组:对照组、Flu 组、PE MPs 组、PHB MPs 组、PE MPs-Flu 共暴露组、PHB MPs-Flu 共暴露组、Flu 孵育的 PE MPs 组和 Flu 孵育的 PHB MPs 组。结果表明,在两种组织中,超氧化物歧化酶(SOD)、过氧化氢酶(CAT)、谷胱甘肽过氧化物酶(GPx)、谷胱甘肽 S-转移酶(GST)和谷胱甘肽还原酶(GR)的活性均明显易受 Flu 和塑料的影响。有趣的是,单独暴露于 PHB MPs 会导致鳃中 CAT 和 GST 的活性水平降低,消化腺中 SOD 和两种组织中 SeGPx 的活性降低。在共暴露和孵育处理中,生化反应通常与 PE MPs 或 PHB MPs 单独作用时的反应相当,这表明微塑料与污染物的联合效应似乎不存在。数据表明生物塑料材料对贻贝消化腺和鳃的生态毒性影响。