Suppr超能文献

家族性特发性肺纤维化(f-IPF)患者的临床特征。

Clinical characteristics of patients with familial idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis (f-IPF).

机构信息

Universities of Giessen and Marburg Lung Center (UGMLC), Member of the German Center for Lung Research (DZL), Universities of Giessen and Marburg Lung Center (UGMLC), European IPF Registry (eurIPFreg), Klinikstrasse 36, 35392, Giessen, Germany.

European IPF Registry & Biobank (eurIPFreg), Giessen, Germany.

出版信息

BMC Pulm Med. 2019 Jul 18;19(1):130. doi: 10.1186/s12890-019-0895-6.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

The aim of this study was to analyze the relative frequency, clinical characteristics, disease onset and progression in f-IPF vs. sporadic IPF (s-IPF).

METHODS

Familial IPF index patients and their family members were recruited into the European IPF registry/biobank (eurIPFreg) at the Universities of Giessen and Marburg (UGMLC). Initially, we employed wide range criteria of f-IPF (e.g. relatives who presumably died of some kind of parenchymal lung disease). After narrowing down the search to occurrence of idiopathic interstitial pneumonia (IIP) in at least one first grade relative, 28 index patients were finally identified, prospectively interviewed and examined. Their family members were phenotyped with establishment of pedigree charts.

RESULTS

Within the 28 IPF families, overall 79 patients with f-IPF were identified. In the same observation period, 286 f-IIP and s-IIP patients were recruited into the eurIPFreg at our UGMLC sites, corresponding to a familial versus s-IPF of 9.8%. The both groups showed no difference in demographics (61 vs. 79% males), smoking history, and exposure to any environmental triggers known to cause lung fibrosis. The f-IPF group differed by an earlier age at the onset of the disease (55.4 vs. 63.2 years; p < 0.001). On average, the f-IPF patients presented a significantly milder extent of functional impairment at the time point of inclusion vs. the s-IPF group (FVC 75% pred. vs. FVC 62% pred., p = 0.011). In contrast, the decline in FVC was found to be faster in the f-IPF vs. the s-IPF group (4.94% decline in 6 months in f-IPF vs. 2.48% in s-IPF, p = 0.12). The average age of death in f-IPF group was 67 years vs. 71.8 years in s-IPF group (p = 0.059). The f-IIP group displayed diverse inheritance patterns, mostly autosomal-dominant with variable penetrance. In the f-IPF, the younger generations showed a tendency for earlier manifestation of IPF vs. the older generation (58 vs. 66 years, p = 0.013).

CONCLUSIONS

The 28 f-IPF index patients presented an earlier onset and more aggressive natural course of the disease. The disease seems to affect consecutive generations at a younger age.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

Nr. NCT02951416 http://www.www.clinicaltrials.gov.

摘要

背景

本研究旨在分析家族性特发性肺纤维化(f-IPF)与散发性特发性肺纤维化(s-IPF)的相对频率、临床特征、发病和进展情况。

方法

家族性 IPF 指数患者及其家属在吉森大学和马尔堡大学(UGMLC)的欧洲 IPF 注册/生物库(eurIPFreg)中招募。最初,我们采用了广泛的 f-IPF 标准(例如,亲属推测死于某种实质肺疾病)。在将搜索范围缩小到至少有一名一级亲属发生特发性间质性肺炎(IIP)后,最终确定了 28 名指数患者,对其进行了前瞻性访谈和检查。通过建立系谱图对其家属进行表型分析。

结果

在 28 个 IPF 家族中,共确定了 79 名 f-IPF 患者。在同一观察期内,在我们的 UGMLC 站点共招募了 286 名 f-IIP 和 s-IIP 患者进入 eurIPFreg,这相当于家族性与 s-IPF 的比例为 9.8%。两组在人口统计学特征(男性比例为 61%与 79%)、吸烟史以及接触任何已知可导致肺纤维化的环境触发因素方面均无差异。f-IPF 组的发病年龄较早(55.4 岁与 63.2 岁;p<0.001)。平均而言,f-IPF 患者在纳入时的功能损伤程度明显较轻(FVC 预测值的 75%与 FVC 预测值的 62%;p=0.011)。相反,f-IPF 组的 FVC 下降速度较快(f-IPF 组在 6 个月内 FVC 下降 4.94%,s-IPF 组下降 2.48%;p=0.12)。f-IPF 组的平均死亡年龄为 67 岁,s-IPF 组为 71.8 岁(p=0.059)。f-IIP 组显示出多种遗传模式,主要为常染色体显性遗传,具有不同的外显率。在 f-IPF 中,年轻一代比老一代更早表现出 IPF 的倾向(58 岁与 66 岁;p=0.013)。

结论

28 名 f-IPF 指数患者表现出更早的发病和更具侵袭性的自然病程。该疾病似乎会以更小的年龄影响连续几代人。

试验注册

编号 NCT02951416 http://www.www.clinicaltrials.gov。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验