From the Department of Surgery, Division of Trauma and Surgical Critical Care (N.E.G., J.R., N.I.F., S.L.B., D.H.L.), Rutgers-New Jersey Medical School, Newark, New Jersey.
J Trauma Acute Care Surg. 2020 Jan;88(1):25-32. doi: 10.1097/TA.0000000000002461.
Trauma is a major cause of death and disability in all ages. Previous reviews have suggested that National Institutes of Health (NIH) funding for trauma is not commensurate with its burden of disease, but a detailed analysis has been lacking. We postulated that NIH spending on trauma research was lower than previously thought and was distributed widely, preventing a comprehensive research strategy that could decrease trauma morbidity and mortality.
The NIH Research Portfolio Online Reporting Tool was initially screened using a search of over 20 terms including "trauma," "injury," "shock," "MVC," and excluding clearly unrelated conditions, for example, "cancer." The details of all grants that screened positive underwent manual review to identify true trauma-related grants. An expert panel was used to adjudicate any ambiguity.
In FY2016, NIH awarded 50,137 grants, of which 6,401 (13%) were captured by our initial screen. Following review, 1,888 (28%) were identified as trauma-related; 3.7% of all NIH grants. These grants (US $720 million) represent only 2.9% of the NIH extramural budget. In addition, the grants were funded and administered by 24 of the institutes and centers across the NIH ranging from 0.01% (National Cancer Institute) to 11% (National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke and National Institute of Arthritis and Musculoskeletal and Skin Diseases) of their extramural portfolios.
Given the extreme burden of trauma-related disability and years of life lost, this review of extramural NIH funding definitively demonstrates that trauma is severely underfunded. The lack of a dedicated home for trauma research at NIH leads to a diffusion of grants across many institutes and makes it impossible to direct a focused and effective national research endeavor to improve outcomes. These data demonstrate the need for a National Institute of Trauma at the NIH to help set an agenda to reach the national goal of Zero Preventable Deaths.
创伤是各年龄段人群死亡和残疾的主要原因。先前的综述表明,美国国立卫生研究院(NIH)对创伤的资助与其疾病负担不成比例,但缺乏详细分析。我们推测,NIH 用于创伤研究的支出低于此前的预期,而且分布广泛,无法制定全面的研究策略,从而降低创伤发病率和死亡率。
最初使用包括“创伤”、“损伤”、“休克”、“MVC”在内的 20 多个术语,对 NIH 研究组合在线报告工具进行了筛选,排除了明显不相关的疾病,例如“癌症”。对所有筛查阳性的拨款的详细信息进行了手动审查,以确定真正与创伤相关的拨款。一个专家小组用于裁决任何歧义。
在 2016 财年,NIH 授予了 50,137 项拨款,其中 6,401 项(13%)被我们的初步筛选捕获。经审查,有 1,888 项(28%)被确定为与创伤相关;占 NIH 所有拨款的 3.7%。这些拨款(7.2 亿美元)仅占 NIH 外部预算的 2.9%。此外,这些拨款由 NIH 下属的 24 个研究所和中心资助和管理,从其外部投资组合的 0.01%(国家癌症研究所)到 11%(国家神经疾病和中风研究所和国家关节炎和肌肉骨骼及皮肤病研究所)不等。
鉴于创伤相关残疾和丧失生命年的负担极其严重,对 NIH 外部资助的这项审查明确表明,创伤的资金严重不足。NIH 没有专门的创伤研究机构,导致拨款分散到许多研究所,使无法针对改善结果开展集中有效的国家研究努力。这些数据表明,NIH 需要设立一个国家创伤研究所,以帮助制定议程,实现零可预防死亡的国家目标。