MAP Centre for Urban Health Solutions, Li Ka Shing Knowledge Institute, St. Michael's Hospital, Toronto, ON, Canada; Department of Family and Community Medicine, St. Michael's Hospital, Toronto, ON, Canada; Department of Family and Community Medicine, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada; ICES, Toronto, ON, Canada; Dalla Lana School of Public Health, Toronto, ON, Canada.
ICES, Toronto, ON, Canada.
Prev Med. 2019 Dec;129:105816. doi: 10.1016/j.ypmed.2019.105816. Epub 2019 Aug 21.
Populations that are more than just slightly overdue for breast, cervical and colorectal screening should likely be targeted for policy and practice interventions. We used provincial-level administrative data to describe the Ontario population who are screen-eligible for breast, cervical and colorectal cancers but overdue by at least five years. For each cancer screening type, we created three cohorts and a binary outcome: screened at least once in the previous five years or not, using March 31, 2017 as our index date. We conducted simple descriptive analyses as well as multivariable logistic regression, where age category, immigrant status, neighbourhood income quintile, region, urban/suburban/rural status, primary care model type, and healthcare utilization were included in the models. More than 20% of Ontarians eligible for each of breast, cervical and colorectal cancer screening respectively had no history of screening in the previous five years. In multivariable analyses, people were significantly more likely to have no recent screening history if they lived in lower-income neighbourhoods (e.g. adjusted odds ratio [95% confidence interval]: 0.59 [0.58-0.59] for cervical screening), were recent immigrants, did not have a primary care provider, had a provider who practiced in a traditional fee-for-service model. Despite the presence of three provincial organized screening programs, we have found that more than one-fifth of Ontarians who are eligible for each of breast, cervical and colorectal screening respectively have not been screened for five years or more. Ensuring that all Ontarians have access to high-quality primary care, may be crucial to increasing screening uptake.
对于那些明显超出了乳腺癌、宫颈癌和结直肠癌筛查期限的人群,应该针对他们采取政策和实践干预措施。我们利用省级行政数据,描述了安大略省符合乳腺癌、宫颈癌和结直肠癌筛查条件但已经逾期至少五年的人群。对于每种癌症筛查类型,我们创建了三个队列和一个二分结果:在过去五年内至少筛查过一次或没有,以 2017 年 3 月 31 日作为我们的索引日期。我们进行了简单的描述性分析和多变量逻辑回归分析,其中包括年龄类别、移民身份、社区收入五分位数、地区、城乡/农村状况、初级保健模式类型和医疗保健利用情况。分别有超过 20%的安大略省乳腺癌、宫颈癌和结直肠癌筛查的合格人群在过去五年内没有任何筛查史。在多变量分析中,如果人们居住在收入较低的社区(例如,宫颈癌筛查的调整后优势比[95%置信区间]:0.59 [0.58-0.59])、是新移民、没有初级保健提供者、提供者采用传统的按服务收费模式,他们就更有可能没有最近的筛查史。尽管有三个省级组织的筛查项目,但我们发现,超过五分之一的分别符合乳腺癌、宫颈癌和结直肠癌筛查条件的安大略省居民已经五年或更长时间没有接受过筛查。确保所有安大略省居民都能获得高质量的初级保健,可能是提高筛查参与度的关键。