Center for Earth System Research and Sustainability (CEN), Universität Hamburg, Bundesstraße 55, 20146, Hamburg, Germany.
Environ Monit Assess. 2019 Sep 5;191(10):612. doi: 10.1007/s10661-019-7786-4.
A variety of methods concerning the identification of microplastics in environmental samples exist. While visual identification is often used, implemented easily, and cost-efficient but implying biased results, spectroscopic or chromatographic approaches are reliable but time-consuming and need specific equipment. Nile red staining is an available alternative and complement method for identifying microplastics. In this study, Nile red staining and subsequent photographing in a UV light photobox was tested on its reliability and feasibility. The approach was compared with a second identification process using again staining but a fluorescence microscope. Selected identified microplastic particles were analyzed by μ-Raman spectroscopy to prove their polymeric origin. The results show that the presented approach is faster compared with the use of a fluorescence microscope or μ-Raman spectroscopy. Furthermore, it is cost-effective as well as accurate for large microplastics > 0.63 mm and, therefore, may be applied when large sample volumes need to be analyzed. Graphical abstract.
存在多种鉴定环境样本中微塑料的方法。虽然目视鉴定通常易于实施且具有成本效益,但结果存在偏差,而光谱或色谱方法虽然可靠但耗时且需要特定设备。尼罗红染色是一种可用的替代和补充鉴定微塑料的方法。在这项研究中,测试了尼罗红染色和随后在 UV 光暗盒中拍照的可靠性和可行性。该方法与再次使用荧光显微镜进行染色的第二种鉴定过程进行了比较。选择鉴定的微塑料颗粒进行 μ-Raman 光谱分析,以证明其聚合物来源。结果表明,与使用荧光显微镜或 μ-Raman 光谱分析相比,所提出的方法更快。此外,对于较大的微塑料(>0.63 毫米),它具有成本效益并且准确,因此在需要分析大量样本时可以应用。