Suppr超能文献

0.2%罗哌卡因容量与坐骨神经阻滞持续时间:健康志愿者的随机、盲法试验。

Volume of ropivacaine 0.2% and sciatic nerve block duration: A randomized, blinded trial in healthy volunteers.

机构信息

Department of Anaesthesiology, Nordsjaellands Hospital, University of Copenhagen, Hillerød, Denmark.

出版信息

Acta Anaesthesiol Scand. 2020 Feb;64(2):238-244. doi: 10.1111/aas.13489. Epub 2019 Oct 27.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Sciatic nerve blocks are used for many orthopaedic procedures on the knee, lower leg, foot and ankle. However, as nerve block durations vary considerably, the timing of supplemental analgesia is challenging. Therefore, knowledge on the effect of local anaesthetic (LA) dose on block duration is important to outweigh the benefits of increasing LA dose against the risk of LA systemic toxicity. In this randomized, double-blind trial, we aimed to explore the relationship between the volume of ropivacaine 0.2% and sciatic nerve block duration. We hypothesized that increasing LA volume would prolong block duration.

METHODS

We randomized 60 healthy volunteers to receive one of five volumes of ropivacaine 0.2%: 5, 10, 15, 20, or 30 mL. We used an ultrasound-guided, catheter-based technique targeting the sciatic nerve in the infragluteal region. The primary outcome was sensory block duration defined as the time of insensitivity to a cold stimulus. Intergroup differences were tested using one-way ANOVA.

RESULTS

Mean (SD) sensory block durations for the tibial nerve (TN) with increasing volume were: 9.3 hours (1.7), 10.4 hours (1.6), 9.7 hours (2.9), 10.7 hours (2.8) and 9.9 hours (2.6). Mean (SD) sensory block durations for the common peroneal nerve (CPN) were: 10.6 hours (2.7), 11.9 hours (1.5), 11.0 hours (3.3), 13.2 hours (3.7), and 13.5 hours (6.1). There were no intergroup differences (P = .67 [TN]; P = .25 [CPN]).

CONCLUSION

We found no effect of increasing the volume of ropivacaine 0.2% from 5 to 30 mL on sensory sciatic nerve block duration.

摘要

背景

坐骨神经阻滞被用于膝关节、小腿、足部和踝关节的许多矫形手术。然而,由于神经阻滞的持续时间差异很大,补充镇痛的时间是具有挑战性的。因此,了解局部麻醉剂(LA)剂量对阻滞持续时间的影响对于权衡增加 LA 剂量的益处与 LA 全身毒性的风险至关重要。在这项随机、双盲试验中,我们旨在探讨 0.2%罗哌卡因体积与坐骨神经阻滞持续时间之间的关系。我们假设增加 LA 体积将延长阻滞持续时间。

方法

我们将 60 名健康志愿者随机分为五组,每组接受 0.2%罗哌卡因 5、10、15、20 或 30 毫升。我们使用超声引导、基于导管的技术,在臀下区域靶向坐骨神经。主要结局是感觉阻滞持续时间,定义为对冷刺激不敏感的时间。采用单因素方差分析检验组间差异。

结果

随着体积的增加,胫神经(TN)的平均(SD)感觉阻滞持续时间分别为:9.3 小时(1.7)、10.4 小时(1.6)、9.7 小时(2.9)、10.7 小时(2.8)和 9.9 小时(2.6)。腓总神经(CPN)的平均(SD)感觉阻滞持续时间分别为:10.6 小时(2.7)、11.9 小时(1.5)、11.0 小时(3.3)、13.2 小时(3.7)和 13.5 小时(6.1)。组间无差异(P=0.67[TN];P=0.25[CPN])。

结论

我们发现,从 5 毫升增加到 30 毫升 0.2%罗哌卡因的体积对感觉坐骨神经阻滞持续时间没有影响。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验