Center for Cancer and Blood Disorders, Department of Pediatrics, University of Colorado Denver, Aurora, CO.
Division of Hematology, Department of Medicine, University of Colorado, Aurora, CO.
Blood Adv. 2019 Oct 22;3(20):2911-2919. doi: 10.1182/bloodadvances.2019000243.
Venetoclax is approved for older untreated acute myeloid leukemia (AML) patients. Venetoclax was available prior to approval off-label. We assessed our single-institution off-label experience with venetoclax/azacitidine, comparing outcomes with a clinical trial cohort that administered this regimen at the same institution. Thirty-three untreated AML patients unfit or unwilling to receive induction chemotherapy and prescribed venetoclax/azacitidine off-trial were retrospectively analyzed and compared with 33 patients who received the same therapy on trial. Outcomes were compared, and comparisons were made to a theoretical scenario in which off-trial patients received induction. Digital droplet polymerase chain reaction evaluated measurable residual disease (MRD). Off-trial venetoclax was attainable in nearly all patients for whom this was desired. The complete remission (CR)/CR with incomplete blood count recovery rate was 63.3% for off-trial patients who received treatment and 84.9% for trial patients (P = .081). The median overall survival for off-trial patients who received treatment was 381 days (95% confidence interval [CI], 174, not reached) vs 880 days (95% CI, 384, not reached) for trial patients (P = .041). Prior exposure to hypomethylating agents was associated with worse outcomes. Response rates with venetoclax/azacitidine were not inferior to a theoretical scenario in which patients received induction, and early death rates were less than expected with induction. MRD negativity was achievable. Newly diagnosed AML patients treated in a "real-world" scenario with off-trial venetoclax/azacitidine had inferior outcomes compared with patients treated in the setting of a clinical trial. Additionally, this therapy may be as effective, and less toxic, when compared with induction chemotherapy.
维奈托克获批用于未经治疗的老年急性髓系白血病(AML)患者。在获得批准之前,维奈托克已经在未经批准的情况下使用。我们评估了我们机构使用维奈托克/阿扎胞苷的经验,将其与在同一机构进行该方案的临床试验队列的结果进行比较。回顾性分析了 33 例不适合或不愿接受诱导化疗且接受维奈托克/阿扎胞苷试验外治疗的未经治疗的 AML 患者,并与接受相同治疗方案的 33 例临床试验患者进行了比较。比较了结果,并与一个理论情景进行了比较,即试验外患者接受了诱导化疗。数字液滴聚合酶链反应评估了可测量的残留疾病(MRD)。对于几乎所有希望接受维奈托克治疗的患者,都可以获得试验外的维奈托克。接受治疗的试验外患者的完全缓解(CR)/不完全血细胞计数恢复率为 63.3%,而临床试验患者为 84.9%(P =.081)。接受治疗的试验外患者的中位总生存期为 381 天(95%置信区间[CI],174,未达到),而临床试验患者为 880 天(95%CI,384,未达到)(P =.041)。先前接触低甲基化剂与预后较差相关。维奈托克/阿扎胞苷的反应率与患者接受诱导治疗的理论情景相当,并且诱导治疗的早期死亡率低于预期。可实现 MRD 阴性。与临床试验环境相比,在真实世界场景中接受试验外维奈托克/阿扎胞苷治疗的新诊断 AML 患者的结局较差。此外,与诱导化疗相比,该疗法可能同样有效且毒性更小。