Infectious Diseases Department, Bellvitge University Hospital, Bellvitge Biomedical Research Institute (IDIBELL), L'Hospitalet de Llobregat, Barcelona, Spain
University of Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain.
Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 2020 Jan 27;64(2). doi: 10.1128/AAC.01521-19.
Infection of long-term central venous catheters (CVCs) remains a challenge in the clinical management of cancer patients. We aimed to determine whether a lock solution with taurolidine-citrate-heparin would be more effective than placebo for preventing nontunneled CVC infection in high-risk neutropenic hematologic patients. We performed a prospective, multicenter, randomized (1:1), double-blind, parallel, superiority, placebo-controlled trial involving 150 hematological patients with neutropenia carrying nontunneled CVCs who were assigned to receive CVC lock solution with taurolidine-citrate-heparin or heparin alone. The primary endpoint was bacterial colonization of the CVC hubs. Secondary endpoints were the incidence of catheter-related bloodstream infection (CRBSI), CVC removal, adverse events related to the lock solution, and the 30-day case fatality rate. CVC lock solution with taurolidine-citrate-heparin was associated with less colonization of the CVC hubs than that with placebo, with no statistically significant differences: 4.1%, versus 10.1% (relative risk [RR] = 0.41, 95% confidence interval [CI] = 0.11 to 1.52), with a cumulative incidence of 4.17 (95% CI = 0.87 to 11.70) and 10.14 (95% CI = 4.18 to 19.79), respectively. There were no significant differences regarding the secondary endpoints. Only three episodes of CRBSI occurred during the study period. No adverse events related to the administration of the lock solution occurred. In this trial involving high-risk patients carrying nontunneled CVCs, the use of taurolidine-citrate-heparin did not show a benefit over the use of placebo. Nevertheless, the safety of this prevention strategy and the trend toward less hub colonization in the taurolidine-citrate-heparin group raise the interest in assessing its efficacy in centers with higher rates of CRBSI. (This study has been registered in ISRCTN under identifier ISRCTN47102251.).
长期中心静脉导管(CVC)感染仍然是癌症患者临床管理中的一个挑战。我们旨在确定牛磺罗定-柠檬酸盐-肝素锁液是否比安慰剂更能有效预防高危中性粒细胞减少的血液系统恶性肿瘤患者的非隧道 CVC 感染。我们进行了一项前瞻性、多中心、随机(1:1)、双盲、平行、优效性、安慰剂对照试验,纳入了 150 名携带非隧道 CVC 的中性粒细胞减少的血液学患者,将其分配至接受牛磺罗定-柠檬酸盐-肝素锁液或单独肝素治疗。主要终点是 CVC 接头的细菌定植。次要终点是导管相关血流感染(CRBSI)的发生率、CVC 拔除、与锁液相关的不良事件以及 30 天病死率。牛磺罗定-柠檬酸盐-肝素锁液与安慰剂相比,CVC 接头的定植率较低,但无统计学差异:4.1%,与 10.1%(相对风险 [RR] = 0.41,95%置信区间 [CI] = 0.11 至 1.52),累积发生率分别为 4.17(95%CI = 0.87 至 11.70)和 10.14(95%CI = 4.18 至 19.79)。次要终点无显著差异。研究期间仅发生 3 例 CRBSI。未发生与锁液给药相关的不良事件。在这项涉及携带非隧道 CVC 的高危患者的试验中,与使用安慰剂相比,使用牛磺罗定-柠檬酸盐-肝素并没有显示出益处。然而,这种预防策略的安全性以及牛磺罗定-柠檬酸盐-肝素组接头定植率降低的趋势引起了人们对在 CRBSI 发生率较高的中心评估其疗效的兴趣。(本研究已在 ISRCTN 下注册,标识符为 ISRCTN47102251。)