Suppr超能文献

比较 Copan WASPLab 结合了 BioRad 专家系统与 SIRscan 2000 自动系统在常规抗菌药物纸片扩散药敏试验中的应用。

Comparison of the Copan WASPLab incorporating the BioRad expert system against the SIRscan 2000 automatic for routine antimicrobial disc diffusion susceptibility testing.

机构信息

Bacteriology Laboratory, Division of Laboratory Medicine, Department of Diagnostics, Geneva University Hospitals, Geneva, Switzerland.

Bacteriology Laboratory, Division of Laboratory Medicine, Department of Diagnostics, Geneva University Hospitals, Geneva, Switzerland.

出版信息

Clin Microbiol Infect. 2020 May;26(5):619-625. doi: 10.1016/j.cmi.2019.11.008. Epub 2019 Nov 13.

Abstract

OBJECTIVES

This study investigated the agreement at the categorical level between the Copan WASPLab incorporating the BioRad expert system against the SIRscan 2000 automatic for antimicrobial disc diffusion susceptibility testing.

METHODS

The 338 clinical strains (67 Pseudomonas aeruginosa, 19 methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus, 75 methicillin-sensitive S. aureus and 177 Enterobacterales isolates) analysed in this study were non-duplicate isolates obtained from consecutive clinical samples referred to the clinical bacteriology laboratory at Geneva University Hospitals between June and August 2019. For the WASPLab the inoculum suspension was prepared in strict accordance with the manufacturer's instruction (Copan WASP srl, Brescia, Italy) by adding 2 mL of the 0.5 McFarland primary suspension used for the SIRscan analysis into a sterile tube filled with 4 mL of sterile saline (1:3 dilution). The inoculum (2 × 30 μL loop/spreader) was spread over the entire surface of Mueller-Hinton agar plates according to the AST streaking pattern defined by Copan. The antibiotic discs were dispensed by the WASP and inoculated media were loaded on conveyors for transfer to the automatic incubators. The plates were incubated for 16 h, and several digital images were acquired. Inhibition zone diameters were automatically read by the WASPLab and were adjusted manually whenever necessary. For the SIRscan 2000 automatic, the antimicrobial disc diffusion susceptibility testing was performed according to the EUCAST guidelines. The gradient strip method was used to resolve discrepancies.

RESULTS

The overall categorical agreement between the compared methods reached 99.1% (797/804; 95% CI 98.2%-99.6%), 99.5% (1029/1034; 95% CI 98.9%-99.8%), and 98.8% (2798/2832; 95% CI 98.3%-99.1%) for P. aeruginosa, S. aureus and the Enterobacterales, respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

WASPLab incorporating the BioRad expert system provides a fully automated solution for antimicrobial disc diffusion susceptibility testing with equal or better accuracy than other available phenotypic methods.

摘要

目的

本研究旨在评估 Copan WASPLab 结合 BioRad 专家系统与 SIRscan 2000 自动系统在抗菌药物药敏纸片扩散法中的分类水平一致性。

方法

本研究共分析了 338 株临床分离株(67 株铜绿假单胞菌、19 株耐甲氧西林金黄色葡萄球菌、75 株甲氧西林敏感金黄色葡萄球菌和 177 株肠杆菌科分离株),均为 2019 年 6 月至 8 月间连续从日内瓦大学附属医院临床细菌学实验室送检的临床样本中获得的非重复分离株。对于 WASPLab,按照制造商的说明(意大利 Brescia 的 Copan WASP srl),用 2 mL 0.5 McFarland 初级悬浮液(用于 SIRscan 分析)加入到装有 4 mL 无菌生理盐水的无菌管中(1:3 稀释)制备接种悬液。根据 Copan 定义的 AST 划线模式,使用 2×30 μL 环/划线器将接种物(2×30 μL 环/划线器)铺展到 Mueller-Hinton 琼脂平板的整个表面。通过 WASP 分配抗生素纸片,并将接种的培养基加载到传送带上,转移到自动孵育箱中。平板孵育 16 小时,获取多个数字图像。通过 WASPLab 自动读取抑菌圈直径,并在必要时手动调整。对于 SIRscan 2000 自动系统,根据 EUCAST 指南进行抗菌药物药敏纸片扩散法检测。使用梯度条带法解决差异。

结果

两种方法的总体分类一致性分别达到 99.1%(797/804;95%可信区间 98.2%-99.6%)、99.5%(1029/1034;95%可信区间 98.9%-99.8%)和 98.8%(2798/2832;95%可信区间 98.3%-99.1%),用于铜绿假单胞菌、金黄色葡萄球菌和肠杆菌科。

结论

结合了 BioRad 专家系统的 WASPLab 为抗菌药物药敏纸片扩散法提供了一种全自动解决方案,其准确性与其他现有表型方法相当或更好。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验