Suppr超能文献

婚姻状况与身体虚弱风险:系统评价和荟萃分析。

Marital Status and Risk of Physical Frailty: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.

机构信息

Videbimus Toranomon Clinic, Tokyo, Japan; Department of Primary Care and Population Health, University College London, London, UK; Health Services Research & Development Center, University of Tsukuba, Tsukuba, Japan.

Department of Primary Care and Population Health, University College London, London, UK.

出版信息

J Am Med Dir Assoc. 2020 Mar;21(3):322-330. doi: 10.1016/j.jamda.2019.09.017. Epub 2019 Nov 16.

Abstract

OBJECTIVES

Evidence on associations between marital status and frailty is limited. The objectives of this study were to perform a systematic review for associations between marital status and physical frailty and to perform a meta-analysis to combine findings.

DESIGN

Systematic review and meta-analysis.

SETTING AND PARTICIPANTS

Community-dwelling older people with mean age ≥60 years.

METHODS

Systematic literature search using 5 databases was conducted in February 2019 to identify longitudinal and cross-sectional studies examining associations between marital status and Fried's phenotype-based frailty status. Additional studies were searched for by reviewing the reference lists of relevant articles and conducting forward citation tracking of included articles. Odds ratio (OR) of marital status and frailty was pooled using a random-effects meta-analysis. Subgroup analysis and analyses stratified by gender and marital status (married, widowed, divorced or separated, and never married) were completed.

RESULTS

A total of 1565 studies were found, from which 3 studies with longitudinal data and 35 studies with cross-sectional data were included. Although longitudinal studies suggested that married men had lower frailty risks than unmarried men while married women had higher frailty risks than widowed women, meta-analysis was not possible because of different methodologies. Meta-analyses of cross-sectional data from 35 studies including 80,754 individuals showed that unmarried individuals were almost twice more likely to be frail than married individuals (pooled odds ratio = 1.88, 95% confidence interval = 1.70-2.07). A high degree of heterogeneity was observed (I = 69%) and was partially explained by reasons for not being married and study location. Stratified analyses showed that pooled risks of frailty in the unmarried compared with the married were not statistically different between women and women (P for difference = .62).

CONCLUSIONS AND IMPLICATIONS

Three and 35 studies, respectively, were found providing longitudinal and cross-sectional data regarding associations between marital status and frailty among community-dwelling older people. A meta-analysis of cross-sectional data showed almost twice higher frailty risk in unmarried individuals compared with married individuals. Marital status should be recognized as an important factor, and more longitudinal studies controlling for potential confounding factors are needed.

摘要

目的

关于婚姻状况与虚弱之间关联的证据有限。本研究的目的是对婚姻状况与身体虚弱之间的关联进行系统综述,并进行荟萃分析以合并研究结果。

设计

系统综述和荟萃分析。

地点和参与者

平均年龄≥60 岁的社区居住的老年人。

方法

于 2019 年 2 月使用 5 个数据库进行系统文献检索,以确定研究婚姻状况与 Fried 基于表型的虚弱状态之间关联的纵向和横断面研究。通过审查相关文章的参考文献和对纳入文章进行正向引文追踪,进一步检索其他研究。使用随机效应荟萃分析汇总婚姻状况和虚弱的比值比(OR)。完成了亚组分析以及按性别和婚姻状况(已婚、丧偶、离异或分居和未婚)分层的分析。

结果

共发现 1565 项研究,其中纳入了 3 项具有纵向数据的研究和 35 项具有横断面数据的研究。尽管纵向研究表明,与未婚男性相比,已婚男性虚弱的风险较低,而与丧偶女性相比,已婚女性虚弱的风险较高,但由于方法学不同,无法进行荟萃分析。对 35 项研究中包含 80754 人的横断面数据的荟萃分析表明,与已婚者相比,未婚者虚弱的可能性几乎高两倍(汇总比值比=1.88,95%置信区间=1.70-2.07)。观察到高度异质性(I=69%),部分原因是未婚的原因和研究地点不同。分层分析显示,在女性中,与已婚者相比,未婚者虚弱的风险差异无统计学意义(差异的 P 值=.62)。

结论和意义

分别发现了 3 项和 35 项研究,提供了关于社区居住的老年人中婚姻状况与虚弱之间关联的纵向和横断面数据。横断面数据的荟萃分析显示,与已婚者相比,未婚者虚弱的风险几乎高两倍。婚姻状况应被视为一个重要因素,需要更多的纵向研究来控制潜在的混杂因素。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验