Suppr超能文献

通过审议方法解决健康不平等问题:健康公平公民小组。

Addressing Health Disparities Through Deliberative Methods: Citizens' Panels for Health Equity.

机构信息

Andrew M. Subica and Brandon J. Brown are with the Department of Social Medicine, Population, and Public Health, Riverside School of Medicine, University of California, Riverside.

出版信息

Am J Public Health. 2020 Feb;110(2):166-173. doi: 10.2105/AJPH.2019.305450. Epub 2019 Dec 19.

Abstract

Health disparities adversely affect millions of people living in disadvantaged communities, resisting public health interventions that do not address the specific conditions, driving forces, or health problems in these communities. Drawing from the underutilized science of deliberative methods, we introduce the innovative citizens' panels for health equity approach-a novel methodology that engages public expertise and knowledge of community health needs, risks, and priorities to tailor public health research and interventions for greater relevance and impact on disadvantaged communities.By engaging affected residents and stakeholders in informed deliberation and decision-making about community health disparities, citizens' panels provide important guidance for (1) designing research studies to target the major health disparities affecting disadvantaged communities and (2) tailoring evidence-based interventions to the perspectives, practices, and preferences of disadvantaged residents.Employed as the primary methodology in 2 federally funded projects conducted in California and Arkansas between 2017 and 2019, citizens' panels offer a systematic method for obtaining rich community insight into health disparities, shaping community-informed solutions, and affording disadvantaged communities influence over public health decision-making to stimulate grassroots change and health equity.

摘要

健康不平等现象严重影响了生活在弱势社区的数百万人,这些社区抵制那些不解决其特定条件、驱动因素或健康问题的公共卫生干预措施。我们借鉴尚未得到充分利用的审议方法科学,提出了具有创新性的健康公平公民小组方法——一种新的方法,它利用公众的专业知识和对社区健康需求、风险和优先事项的了解,使公共卫生研究和干预措施更符合弱势社区的实际情况,产生更大的影响。通过让受影响的居民和利益攸关方参与关于社区健康不平等问题的知情审议和决策,公民小组为以下方面提供了重要指导:(1) 设计研究以针对影响弱势社区的主要健康不平等问题;(2) 根据弱势居民的观点、实践和偏好调整基于证据的干预措施。公民小组作为 2017 年至 2019 年在加利福尼亚州和阿肯色州开展的 2 个联邦资助项目中的主要方法,为深入了解健康不平等问题提供了一种系统的方法,形成了以社区为导向的解决方案,并使弱势社区能够对公共卫生决策产生影响,以激发基层变革和健康公平。

相似文献

1
Addressing Health Disparities Through Deliberative Methods: Citizens' Panels for Health Equity.
Am J Public Health. 2020 Feb;110(2):166-173. doi: 10.2105/AJPH.2019.305450. Epub 2019 Dec 19.
3
The use of citizens' juries in health policy decision-making: a systematic review.
Soc Sci Med. 2014 May;109:1-9. doi: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2014.03.005. Epub 2014 Mar 6.
4
Citizens' juries in planning research priorities: process, engagement and outcome.
Health Expect. 2008 Sep;11(3):272-81. doi: 10.1111/j.1369-7625.2008.00502.x.
5
Effectiveness of public deliberation methods for gathering input on issues in healthcare: Results from a randomized trial.
Soc Sci Med. 2015 May;133:11-20. doi: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2015.03.024. Epub 2015 Mar 14.
6
Do consumer voices in health-care citizens' juries matter?
Health Expect. 2016 Oct;19(5):1015-22. doi: 10.1111/hex.12397. Epub 2015 Sep 28.
7
Influencing health policy through public deliberation: Lessons learned from two decades of Citizens'/community juries.
Soc Sci Med. 2017 Apr;179:166-171. doi: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2017.03.003. Epub 2017 Mar 2.
8
Members of Minority and Underserved Communities Set Priorities for Health Research.
Milbank Q. 2018 Dec;96(4):675-705. doi: 10.1111/1468-0009.12354.
10
[Science and deliberation].
Epidemiol Prev. 2008 Nov-Dec;32(6):319-24.

引用本文的文献

1
Native Hawaiian and Pacific Islander Youth Substance Use Prevention in Rural Hawai'i.
Hawaii J Health Soc Welf. 2024 May;83(5):144-146. doi: 10.62547/DUAS8087.
2
Trauma and mental health in Pacific Islanders.
Int J Soc Psychiatry. 2024 Aug;70(5):861-873. doi: 10.1177/00207640241236109. Epub 2024 Mar 15.
4
CRISPR in Public Health: The Health Equity Implications and Role of Community in Gene-Editing Research and Applications.
Am J Public Health. 2023 Aug;113(8):874-882. doi: 10.2105/AJPH.2023.307315. Epub 2023 May 18.
8
Living With HIV During the COVID-19 Pandemic: Impacts for Older Adults in Palm Springs, California.
AIDS Educ Prev. 2021 Aug;33(4):265-275. doi: 10.1521/aeap.2021.33.4.265.
9
Survey on the indexes of health equity in the physical environment and infrastructures of Kermanshah province, Iran.
J Egypt Public Health Assoc. 2021 Apr 1;96(1):8. doi: 10.1186/s42506-021-00068-z.
10
Hazardous drinking, alcohol use disorders, and need for treatment among Pacific Islander young adults.
Am J Orthopsychiatry. 2020;90(5):557-566. doi: 10.1037/ort0000456. Epub 2020 Apr 30.

本文引用的文献

1
Mental Health Status, Need, and Unmet Need for Mental Health Services Among U.S. Pacific Islanders.
Psychiatr Serv. 2019 Jul 1;70(7):578-585. doi: 10.1176/appi.ps.201800455. Epub 2019 Apr 17.
2
Community-Driven Health Priorities for Healthy Aging With HIV.
J Assoc Nurses AIDS Care. 2019 Jan-Feb;30(1):119-128. doi: 10.1097/JNC.0000000000000042.
3
Deliberative democracy in health care: current challenges and future prospects.
J Healthc Leadersh. 2015 Dec 16;7:123-136. doi: 10.2147/JHL.S70021. eCollection 2015.
4
Clinical implications of aging with HIV infection: perspectives and the future medical care agenda.
AIDS. 2017 Jun 1;31 Suppl 2:S129-S135. doi: 10.1097/QAD.0000000000001478.
5
Deliberative Engagement Methods for Patient-Centered Outcomes Research.
Patient. 2017 Oct;10(5):545-552. doi: 10.1007/s40271-017-0238-8.
6
Communities of Color Creating Healthy Environments to Combat Childhood Obesity.
Am J Public Health. 2016 Jan;106(1):79-86. doi: 10.2105/AJPH.2015.302887. Epub 2015 Nov 12.
9
Enhancing citizen engagement in cancer screening through deliberative democracy.
J Natl Cancer Inst. 2013 Mar 20;105(6):380-6. doi: 10.1093/jnci/djs649. Epub 2013 Feb 1.
10
Public deliberation in decisions about health research.
Virtual Mentor. 2013 Jan 1;15(1):56-64. doi: 10.1001/virtualmentor.2013.15.1.pfor2-1301.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验