Center for Genomic Medicine, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA, 02114, USA.
Center for Genomic Medicine, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA, 02114, USA; Stanley Center for Psychiatric Research, The Broad Institute of Harvard and MIT, Cambridge, MA, 02142, USA; Department of Psychiatry, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, 02115, USA.
Psychoneuroendocrinology. 2020 Mar;113:104484. doi: 10.1016/j.psyneuen.2019.104484. Epub 2019 Nov 6.
Exposure to adversity has been linked to accelerated biological aging, which in turn has been shown to predict numerous physical and mental health problems. In recent years, measures of DNA methylation-based epigenetic age--known as "epigenetic clocks"--have been used to estimate accelerated epigenetic aging. Although a small number of studies have found an effect of adversity exposure on epigenetic age in children, none have investigated if there are "sensitive periods" when adversity is most impactful.
Using data from the Avon Longitudinal Study of Parents and Children (ALSPAC; n = 973), we tested the prospective association between repeated measures of childhood exposure to seven types of adversity on epigenetic age assessed at age 7.5 using the Horvath and Hannum epigenetic clocks. With a Least Angle Regression variable selection procedure, we evaluated potential sensitive period effects.
We found that exposure to abuse, financial hardship, or neighborhood disadvantage during sensitive periods in early and middle childhood best explained variability in the deviation of Hannum-based epigenetic age from chronological age, even after considering the role of adversity accumulation and recency. Secondary sex-stratified analyses identified particularly strong sensitive period effects. These effects were undetected in analyses comparing children "exposed" versus "unexposed" to adversity. We did not identify any associations between adversity and epigenetic age using the Horvath epigenetic clock.
Our results suggest that adversity may alter methylation processes in ways that either directly or indirectly perturb normal cellular aging and that these effects may be heightened during specific life stages.
逆境暴露与生物衰老加速有关,而衰老加速又与许多身心健康问题相关。近年来,基于 DNA 甲基化的表观遗传年龄(称为“表观遗传时钟”)已被用于估计加速的表观遗传衰老。尽管少数研究发现逆境暴露对儿童的表观遗传年龄有影响,但尚无研究探讨逆境影响最大的“敏感时期”。
利用阿冯纵向父母与子女研究(ALSPAC;n=973)的数据,我们测试了在儿童期经历的七种逆境的重复测量与 7.5 岁时基于 Horvath 和 Hannum 的表观遗传时钟评估的表观遗传年龄之间的前瞻性关联。通过最小角回归变量选择程序,我们评估了潜在的敏感时期效应。
我们发现,在儿童早期和中期的敏感时期,暴露于虐待、经济困难或邻里劣势中,最能解释基于 Hannum 的表观遗传年龄与实际年龄之间的偏差的可变性,即使考虑到逆境积累和最近的作用也是如此。二级性别分层分析确定了特别强烈的敏感时期效应。在比较暴露于逆境和未暴露于逆境的儿童的分析中,未发现这些效应。我们使用 Horvath 表观遗传时钟未发现逆境与表观遗传年龄之间的任何关联。
我们的结果表明,逆境可能会以直接或间接干扰正常细胞衰老的方式改变甲基化过程,并且这些影响在特定的生命阶段可能会加剧。