Commonwealth Scientific and Industrial Research Organisation - Health and Biosecurity, North Ryde, Australia.
Division of Human Nutrition, Wageningen University & Research, Wageningen, The Netherlands.
J Nutr. 2020 Apr 1;150(4):800-805. doi: 10.1093/jn/nxz344.
Effects of very low carbohydrate (VLC) diets on appetite response in individuals with type 2 diabetes remain unclear.
A secondary analysis was conducted to determine appetite responses to an energy-restricted [30% of energy (%E) deficit] very low carbohydrate (VLC) diet compared with a higher carbohydrate (HC) diet in adults who were overweight or obese with type 2 diabetes.
Forty-four men and 40 women (mean ± SD, age: 58.7 ± 6.6 y; weight: 100.4 ± 15.5 kg; BMI: 34.5 ± 4.1 kg/m2; glycated hemoglobin: 7.3 ± 1.0%; duration of diabetes: 6.7 ± 5.6 y) were randomly assigned to diets categorized as VLC [14%E carbohydrate (<50 g/d), 28%E protein, 58%E fat (<10%E saturated fat)], or energy-matched HC [53%E carbohydrate, 17%E protein, 30%E fat (<10%E saturated fat)] combined with progressive multicomponent exercise (60 min; 3 d/wk). Body weight, average weekly "daily fasting" and "daily overall" appetite perceptions (hunger, fullness, prospective consumption, and desire to eat-visual analog scales) were assessed at baseline and after 4 and 16 wk. Changes between diets over time were assessed using repeated measures ANOVA.
Significant decreases in body weight did not differ between groups (VLC: -11.0 ± 5.4 kg/16 wk compared with HC: -10.1 ± 4.3 kg/16 wk, P = 0.40). Compared with HC, VLC had greater decreases in "daily overall" ratings of fullness (P time × diet < 0.01), such that scores were higher in HC at Week 4 (VLC:48 ± 3 vs HC:56 ± 3 mm, P = 0.001) and 16 (VLC:51 ± 2 vs HC:57 ± 3 mm, P = 0.019). Compared with HC, VLC had greater increases in prospective consumption ratings (P time × diet = 0.03), such that scores were lower in HC at Week 4 (VLC:33 ± 2 vs HC:28 ± 2 mm, P = 0.008), but not at Week 16 (VLC:33 ± 2 vs HC 31 ± 2 mm, P = 0.289).
In the context of energy restriction, both HC and VLC energy-matched diets promoted comparable effects on fasting perceptions of appetite, but the HC diet resulted in greater "daily overall" fullness and reduced prospective consumption. Further research is required to evaluate the effects of ad libitum diets differing in amounts of carbohydrate on appetite response in populations with type 2 diabetes. This trial was registered at www.anzctr.org.au as ACTRN12612000369820.
极低碳水化合物(VLC)饮食对 2 型糖尿病患者的食欲反应的影响仍不清楚。
对超重或肥胖的 2 型糖尿病成人进行一项二次分析,以确定与高碳水化合物(HC)饮食相比,能量限制(能量不足 30%)的极低碳水化合物(VLC)饮食对食欲的反应。
44 名男性和 40 名女性(平均±标准差,年龄:58.7±6.6 岁;体重:100.4±15.5kg;BMI:34.5±4.1kg/m2;糖化血红蛋白:7.3±1.0%;糖尿病病程:6.7±5.6 年)被随机分配到两种饮食中,分别归类为 VLC[14%E 碳水化合物(<50g/d),28%E 蛋白质,58%E 脂肪(<10%E 饱和脂肪)]或能量匹配的 HC[53%E 碳水化合物,17%E 蛋白质,30%E 脂肪(<10%E 饱和脂肪)],并结合渐进式多成分运动(60 分钟;每周 3 天)。在基线和 4 周和 16 周后评估体重、平均每周“每日空腹”和“每日整体”食欲感知(饥饿感、饱腹感、预期摄入量和食欲-视觉模拟量表)。使用重复测量方差分析评估随时间变化的饮食变化。
体重减轻在两组之间没有差异(VLC:-11.0±5.4kg/16 周与 HC:-10.1±4.3kg/16 周,P=0.40)。与 HC 相比,VLC 对“每日整体”饱腹感的评分下降更大(P 时间×饮食<0.01),因此在第 4 周(VLC:48±3 与 HC:56±3mm,P=0.001)和第 16 周(VLC:51±2 与 HC:57±3mm,P=0.019)时,HC 的评分更高。与 HC 相比,VLC 对预期摄入量的评分增加更大(P 时间×饮食=0.03),因此在第 4 周(VLC:33±2 与 HC:28±2mm,P=0.008)时,HC 的评分较低,但在第 16 周(VLC:33±2 与 HC 31±2mm,P=0.289)时则不然。
在能量限制的情况下,HC 和 VLC 能量匹配饮食都对空腹时的食欲感知产生了类似的影响,但 HC 饮食会导致更大的“每日整体”饱腹感和减少预期摄入量。需要进一步研究不同碳水化合物含量的自由饮食对 2 型糖尿病患者的食欲反应的影响。这项试验在 www.anzctr.org.au 上注册,注册号为 ACTRN12612000369820。