Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center and University of Washington School of Medicine, Seattle, Washington (G.B.M., B.M.S., M.M., M.S., S.A.P., G.C., S.H., M.B., M.D.F., S.J.L., F.R.A., R.S., P.J.M., H.J.D.).
Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center, Seattle, Washington (G.S., T.A.G.).
Ann Intern Med. 2020 Feb 18;172(4):229-239. doi: 10.7326/M19-2936. Epub 2020 Jan 21.
Allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation is indicated for refractory hematologic cancer and some nonmalignant disorders. Survival is limited by recurrent cancer and organ toxicity.
To determine whether survival has improved over the past decade and note impediments to better outcomes.
The authors compared cohorts that had transplants during 2003 to 2007 versus 2013 to 2017. Survival outcome measures were analyzed, along with transplant-related complications.
A center performing allogeneic transplant procedures.
All recipients of a first allogeneic transplant during 2003 to 2007 and 2013 to 2017.
Patients received a conditioning regimen, infusion of donor hematopoietic cells, then immunosuppressive drugs and antimicrobial approaches to infection control.
Day-200 nonrelapse mortality (NRM), recurrence or progression of cancer, relapse-related mortality, and overall mortality, adjusted for comorbidity scores, source of donor cells, donor type, patient age, disease severity, conditioning regimen, patient and donor sex, and cytomegalovirus serostatus.
During the 2003-to-2007 and 2013-to-2017 periods, 1148 and 1131 patients, respectively, received their first transplant. Over the decade, decreases were seen in the adjusted hazards of day-200 NRM (hazard ratio [HR], 0.66 [95% CI, 0.48 to 0.89]), relapse of cancer (HR, 0.76 [CI, 0.61 to 0.94]), relapse-related mortality (HR, 0.69 [CI, 0.54 to 0.87]), and overall mortality (HR, 0.66 [CI, 0.56 to 0.78]). The degree of reduction in overall mortality was similar for patients who received myeloablative versus reduced-intensity conditioning, as well as for patients whose allograft came from a matched sibling versus an unrelated donor. Reductions were also seen in the frequency of jaundice, renal insufficiency, mechanical ventilation, high-level cytomegalovirus viremia, gram-negative bacteremia, invasive mold infection, acute and chronic graft-versus-host disease, and prednisone exposure.
Cohort studies cannot determine causality, and current disease severity criteria were not available for patients in the 2003-to-2007 cohort.
Improvement in survival and reduction in complications were substantial after allogeneic transplant. Relapse of cancer remains the largest obstacle to better survival outcomes.
National Institutes of Health.
同种异体造血细胞移植适用于难治性血液系统恶性肿瘤和某些非恶性疾病。癌症复发和器官毒性限制了患者的生存。
确定过去十年中患者的生存率是否有所提高,并指出影响预后的因素。
作者比较了在 2003 年至 2007 年期间和 2013 年至 2017 年期间接受同种异体移植的患者队列。分析了生存结果指标和与移植相关的并发症。
一家开展同种异体移植的中心。
所有在 2003 年至 2007 年和 2013 年至 2017 年期间接受首次同种异体移植的患者。
患者接受预处理方案、供者造血细胞输注,然后接受免疫抑制药物和抗感染方案。
第 200 天非复发死亡率(NRM)、癌症复发或进展、复发相关死亡率和总死亡率,采用合并症评分、供者细胞来源、供者类型、患者年龄、疾病严重程度、预处理方案、患者和供者性别、巨细胞病毒血清学状态进行调整。
在 2003 年至 2007 年和 2013 年至 2017 年期间,分别有 1148 例和 1131 例患者接受了首次移植。在这十年间,第 200 天 NRM 的调整后风险(HR,0.66[95%CI,0.48 至 0.89])、癌症复发(HR,0.76[CI,0.61 至 0.94])、复发相关死亡率(HR,0.69[CI,0.54 至 0.87])和总死亡率(HR,0.66[CI,0.56 至 0.78])均呈下降趋势。接受清髓性与非清髓性预处理、同种异体移植物来源于匹配的同胞供者与无关供者的患者,其总死亡率降低程度相似。黄疸、肾功能不全、机械通气、高水平巨细胞病毒血症、革兰阴性菌血症、侵袭性霉菌感染、急性和慢性移植物抗宿主病、泼尼松暴露的发生率也有所降低。
队列研究不能确定因果关系,并且在 2003 年至 2007 年期间的患者队列中没有当前的疾病严重程度标准。
同种异体移植后,生存改善和并发症减少的幅度很大。癌症复发仍然是影响生存的最大障碍。
美国国立卫生研究院。