Centre for Epidemiology and Evidence-Based Practice, Department of Social and Preventive Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, University of Malaya , Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia.
Department of Pharmacology, Faculty of Medicine, University of Malaya , Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia.
Hum Vaccin Immunother. 2020 Jul 2;16(7):1511-1520. doi: 10.1080/21645515.2019.1706935. Epub 2020 Jan 24.
This study engaged health professionals in in-depth, semi-structured interviews to explore their opinions concerning the issues surrounding vaccine hesitancy in Malaysia and strategies to improve vaccination to stamp the rise of vaccine preventable diseases (VPDs). Opinions on how to address the resurgence of VPDs in the era of increasing vaccine hesitancy were obtained. Eight health professionals, including geriatricians, pediatricians, microbiologists, public health specialists, and family medicine specialists were interviewed. The influence of anti-vaccination propaganda, past-experience of adverse event following immunization (AEFI), perceived religious prohibition, a belief that traditional complementary and alternative medicine (TCAM) use is safer, pseudoscience beliefs, and anti-vaccine conspiracy theories were identified as reasons for refusing to vaccinate. The interplay of social, cultural and religious perspectives in influencing perceived religious prohibition, pseudoscience beliefs, and the use of TCAM contributing to vaccine refusal was found. Five broad themes emerged from the health professionals regarding strategies to address vaccine hesitancy, including establishing an electronic vaccination registry, increasing public awareness initiatives, providing feedback to the public on the findings of AEFI, training of front-line healthcare providers, and banning the dissemination of anti-vaccine information via social media. With regards to identifying strategies to address the resurgence of VPDs, mandatory vaccination received mixed opinions; many viewed supplementary immunization activity and the prevention of travel and migration of unvaccinated individuals as being necessary. In conclusion, the present study identified unique local cultural, traditional and religious beliefs that could contribute to vaccine hesitancy in addition to issues surrounding vaccination refusal similarly faced by other countries around the world. This information are important for the formulation of targeted intervention strategies to stamp vaccine hesitancy in Malaysia which are also a useful guide for other countries especially in the Southeast Asia region facing similar vaccine hesitancy issues.
本研究通过深入的半结构化访谈让医疗专业人员参与其中,以探讨他们对马来西亚疫苗犹豫问题的看法以及改善疫苗接种策略以遏制疫苗可预防疾病(VPD)上升的看法。我们还获得了有关如何解决在疫苗犹豫不断增加的时代中 VPD 死灰复燃的意见。访谈了 8 位医疗专业人员,包括老年病学家、儿科医生、微生物学家、公共卫生专家和家庭医学专家。他们认为,反疫苗宣传、疫苗接种后不良反应(AEFI)的过往经历、感知到的宗教禁忌、认为传统补充和替代医学(TCAM)更安全的信念、伪科学信仰以及反疫苗阴谋论是拒绝接种疫苗的原因。研究发现,社会、文化和宗教观点的相互作用会影响感知到的宗教禁忌、伪科学信仰和 TCAM 的使用,从而导致疫苗接种拒绝。健康专业人员针对疫苗犹豫提出了五个广泛的主题,包括建立电子疫苗登记册、增加公众意识倡议、就 AEFI 的发现向公众提供反馈、培训一线医疗保健提供者,以及禁止通过社交媒体传播反疫苗信息。关于确定应对 VPD 死灰复燃的策略,强制接种疫苗的意见不一;许多人认为有必要开展补充免疫活动,并防止未接种疫苗的个人旅行和移民。总之,本研究确定了独特的本地文化、传统和宗教信仰,这些信仰除了世界其他国家面临的类似疫苗接种拒绝问题外,还可能导致疫苗犹豫。这些信息对于制定有针对性的干预策略来遏制马来西亚的疫苗犹豫情绪非常重要,对于面临类似疫苗犹豫问题的其他国家,尤其是东南亚地区的国家,也具有重要的指导意义。