Suppr超能文献

随机临床试验的推广性:正在进行的前哨淋巴结阳性乳腺癌 SENOMAC 试验的中期外部有效性分析。

The generalisability of randomised clinical trials: an interim external validity analysis of the ongoing SENOMAC trial in sentinel lymph node-positive breast cancer.

机构信息

Department of Surgery, Capio St Göran's Hospital, Stockholm, Sweden.

Department of Molecular Medicine and Surgery, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden.

出版信息

Breast Cancer Res Treat. 2020 Feb;180(1):167-176. doi: 10.1007/s10549-020-05537-1. Epub 2020 Jan 27.

Abstract

PURPOSE

None of the key randomised trials on the omission of axillary lymph node dissection (ALND) in sentinel lymph-positive breast cancer have reported external validity, even though results indicate selection bias. Our aim was to assess the external validity of the ongoing randomised SENOMAC trial by comparing characteristics of Swedish SENOMAC trial participants with non-included eligible patients registered in the Swedish National Breast Cancer Register (NKBC).

METHODS

In the ongoing non-inferiority European SENOMAC trial, clinically node-negative cT1-T3 breast cancer patients with up to two sentinel lymph node macrometastases are randomised to undergo completion ALND or not. Both breast-conserving surgery and mastectomy are eligible interventions. Data from NKBC were extracted for the years 2016 and 2017, and patient and tumour characteristics compared with Swedish trial participants from the same years.

RESULTS

Overall, 306 NKBC cases from non-participating and 847 NKBC cases from participating sites (excluding SENOMAC participants) were compared with 463 SENOMAC trial participants. Patients belonging to the middle age groups (p = 0.015), with smaller tumours (p = 0.013) treated by breast-conserving therapy (50.3 versus 47.1 versus 65.2%, p < 0.001) and less nodal tumour burden (only 1 macrometastasis in 78.8 versus 79.9 versus 87.3%, p = 0.001) were over-represented in the trial population. Time trends indicated, however, that differences may be mitigated over time.

CONCLUSIONS

This interim external validity analysis specifically addresses selection mechanisms during an ongoing trial, potentially increasing generalisability by the time full accrual is reached. Similar validity checks should be an integral part of prospective clinical trials.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

NCT02240472, retrospective registration date September 14, 2015 after trial initiation on January 31, 2015.

摘要

目的

在 sentinel 淋巴结阳性乳腺癌中省略腋淋巴结清扫(ALND)的关键随机试验均未报告外部有效性,尽管结果表明存在选择偏倚。我们的目的是通过比较瑞典 SENOMAC 试验参与者与在瑞典国家乳腺癌登记处(NKBC)登记的未纳入的合格患者的特征,来评估正在进行的 SENOMAC 试验的外部有效性。

方法

在正在进行的非劣效性欧洲 SENOMAC 试验中,临床淋巴结阴性 cT1-T3 乳腺癌患者最多有两个前哨淋巴结巨转移,随机接受完成 ALND 或不接受。保乳手术和乳房切除术均为合格的干预措施。从 NKBC 提取 2016 年和 2017 年的数据,并将患者和肿瘤特征与同年的瑞典试验参与者进行比较。

结果

总体而言,306 例来自非参与 NKBC 的病例和 847 例来自参与 NKBC 的病例(不包括 SENOMAC 参与者)与 463 例 SENOMAC 试验参与者进行了比较。属于中年组的患者(p=0.015)、肿瘤较小(p=0.013)、接受保乳治疗的患者(50.3%对 47.1%对 65.2%,p<0.001)和淋巴结肿瘤负担较小(仅 78.8%对 79.9%对 87.3%有 1 个巨转移,p=0.001)的患者在试验人群中过度代表。然而,时间趋势表明,随着时间的推移,差异可能会减轻。

结论

这项中期外部有效性分析专门针对正在进行的试验中的选择机制,随着完全入组的时间的推移,可能会提高可推广性。类似的有效性检查应该成为前瞻性临床试验的一个组成部分。

试验注册

NCT02240472,回顾性注册日期为 2015 年 9 月 14 日,试验于 2015 年 1 月 31 日启动。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/da21/7031168/e2be99e0cbdb/10549_2020_5537_Fig1_HTML.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验