Ocular Microbiology, Dr. R.P.Centre for Ophthalmic Sciences, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, New Delhi, India.
Ocular Microbiology, Dr. R.P.Centre for Ophthalmic Sciences, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, New Delhi, India; Department of Microbiology, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, New Delhi, India.
J Infect Public Health. 2020 Jul;13(7):998-1002. doi: 10.1016/j.jiph.2020.01.007. Epub 2020 Feb 13.
Early and accurate laboratory diagnosis and appropriate management of infection improves the survival rate in sepsis. In this study we evaluated broad range 16S rRNA and 16 S-23 S intergenic spacer region (ISR) PCR assays followed by nucleotide sequencing directly from patients' serum and automated blood culture for laboratory diagnosis in admitted sepsis patients.
A broad range 16S rRNA PCR and 16 S-23 S ISR PCR assay followed by nucleotide sequencing was used directly from patients' serum in hospital admitted patients in 62 sepsis and 16 suspected blood stream infection (sBSI) patients. Automated blood culture was also used in the same patients. Nucleotide sequences were analyzed against NCBI Genbank database and organisms were identified using CLSI MM18A guidelines.
Bacterial culture were positive in 10/62 (16.12%) sepsis and 3/16 (18.75%) suspected BSI patients along with 3 detected fungi (2 in sepsis and 1 in suspected BSI group). PCR assay was positive in 36/62 (58.06%) sepsis and 6/16 (37.5%) suspected BSI patients respectively. All but 2 bacteria (both from culture negative patients) detected by PCR assay could be identified from nucleotide sequencing. Survival in sepsis patients was 77%. PCR assay could detect bacteria in 9/14 (64.28%) of sepsis patients with death.
Broad range PCR assay was far superior for early diagnosis of infection. The bacteria which could not be detected by culture and were not commonly reported from this centre, were detected by the broad range PCR assays. Detection of these rare bacteria/fungi had significant clinical correlation with patient's underlying clinical conditions, immune status and prognosis. The tests could provide definitive diagnosis of infection in >58% of sepsis patients, which helped in patient management and better survival.
早期、准确的实验室诊断和适当的感染管理可提高脓毒症患者的生存率。在这项研究中,我们评估了宽范围 16S rRNA 和 16S-23S 基因间隔区(ISR)PCR 检测,然后直接从患者血清和自动血培养物中进行核苷酸测序,用于住院脓毒症患者的实验室诊断。
对 62 例脓毒症和 16 例疑似血流感染(sBSI)患者的住院患者血清进行宽范围 16S rRNA PCR 和 16S-23S ISR PCR 检测,然后进行核苷酸测序。同样的患者也进行了自动血培养。核苷酸序列与 NCBI Genbank 数据库进行分析,根据 CLSI MM18A 指南鉴定生物体。
10/62(16.12%)例脓毒症和 3/16(18.75%)例疑似 BSI 患者的细菌培养阳性,3 例真菌(2 例脓毒症,1 例疑似 BSI 组)阳性。PCR 检测分别在 36/62(58.06%)例脓毒症和 6/16(37.5%)例疑似 BSI 患者中阳性。PCR 检测到的除 2 株细菌(均来自培养阴性患者)外,均可通过核苷酸测序鉴定。脓毒症患者的存活率为 77%。PCR 检测可在 9/14(64.28%)死亡脓毒症患者中检测到细菌。
宽范围 PCR 检测更适合早期感染诊断。培养无法检测到的、本中心未常见报道的细菌,通过宽范围 PCR 检测得以检出。这些罕见细菌/真菌的检测与患者的基础临床情况、免疫状态和预后有显著的临床相关性。这些检测可在>58%的脓毒症患者中提供感染的明确诊断,有助于患者管理和提高生存率。