Graduate School of Health, University of Technology Sydney, 100 Broadway, Building 20, Lvl 10, PO Box 123 Broadway, NSW 2007, Australia.
Pharmaceutical Care Research Group, Faculty of Pharmacy, University of Granada, Campus Universitario Cartuja, Granada, Spain.
Res Social Adm Pharm. 2020 Oct;16(10):1331-1343. doi: 10.1016/j.sapharm.2020.01.015. Epub 2020 Feb 14.
Implementation science emerged to address the challenges associated with the incorporation of evidence-based innovations into practice. Once the challenge is overcome, the ultimate goal is to achieve the sustainability of innovations to promote their continuity and long-term integration. Conceptual approaches and assessment tools have been designed to assess the sustainability of innovations in research and practice environments. However, the variability of approaches and tools available becomes a challenge for policymakers, researchers and practitioners, particularly when deciding how to evaluate the sustainability of innovations.
To identify conceptual approaches and assessment tools for the sustainability of healthcare innovations and to develop a specific discipline-based framework for the sustainability of professional pharmacy services.
A systematic literature review was conducted in January of 2019 using PubMed, Scopus, and Web of Science. General information regarding the conceptual approaches (based on Nilsen's classification), assessment tools and the factors affecting the sustainability of the healthcare innovations was retrieved.
From 3123 articles screened, 132 articles were selected from which 106 conceptual approaches and 26 assessment tools were identified. Several key factors moderating the sustainability of the innovations in healthcare were identified (e.g. funding, adaptation). A framework for the sustainability of professional pharmacy services is proposed based on these factors. It presents three performance domains influencing the service sustainability (i.e. environment, social and economic).
The identified approaches in different healthcare settings have allowed the adaptation and design of a specific framework for pharmacy. The core factors included in the proposed framework are moderators of the sustainability process and should be considered in sustainability studies and evaluations. This framework will guide pharmacy practice researchers and practitioners to measure and achieve the sustainability of professional pharmacy services. Furthermore, the adaptation of this framework will allow its application to other healthcare settings. (Registration number CRD42018092160).
实施科学的出现是为了解决将循证创新纳入实践所面临的挑战。一旦挑战得到克服,最终目标是实现创新的可持续性,以促进其连续性和长期融入。已经设计了概念方法和评估工具来评估研究和实践环境中创新的可持续性。然而,可用方法和工具的多样性对政策制定者、研究人员和实践者来说是一个挑战,特别是在决定如何评估创新的可持续性时。
确定医疗保健创新可持续性的概念方法和评估工具,并为专业药学服务的可持续性制定特定的学科框架。
2019 年 1 月,我们通过 PubMed、Scopus 和 Web of Science 进行了系统的文献综述。检索了关于概念方法(基于 Nilsen 的分类)、评估工具以及影响医疗保健创新可持续性的因素的一般信息。
从筛选出的 3123 篇文章中,选择了 132 篇文章,从中确定了 106 种概念方法和 26 种评估工具。确定了影响医疗保健创新可持续性的几个关键因素(例如资金、适应性)。在此基础上提出了一个专业药学服务可持续性框架。它提出了影响服务可持续性的三个绩效领域(即环境、社会和经济)。
不同医疗保健环境中确定的方法允许对特定的药学框架进行调整和设计。所提出框架中包含的核心因素是可持续性过程的调节因素,应在可持续性研究和评估中加以考虑。该框架将指导药学实践研究人员和从业者衡量和实现专业药学服务的可持续性。此外,该框架的适应性将允许其应用于其他医疗保健环境。(注册号 CRD42018092160)。