Liu Connor J, Schaettler Maximilian, Blaha Dylan T, Bowman-Kirigin Jay A, Kobayashi Dale K, Livingstone Alexandra J, Bender Diane, Miller Christopher A, Kranz David M, Johanns Tanner M, Dunn Gavin P
Department of Neurological Surgery, Washington University School of Medicine, St Louis, Missouri.
Department of Pathology and Immunology, Washington University School of Medicine, St Louis, Missouri.
Neuro Oncol. 2020 Sep 29;22(9):1276-1288. doi: 10.1093/neuonc/noaa050.
Although clinical trials testing immunotherapies in glioblastoma (GBM) have yielded mixed results, new strategies targeting tumor-specific somatic coding mutations, termed "neoantigens," represent promising therapeutic approaches. We characterized the microenvironment and neoantigen landscape of the aggressive CT2A GBM model in order to develop a platform to test combination checkpoint blockade and neoantigen vaccination.
Flow cytometric analysis was performed on intracranial CT2A and GL261 tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes (TILs). Whole-exome DNA and RNA sequencing of the CT2A murine GBM was employed to identify expressed, somatic mutations. Predicted neoantigens were identified using the pVAC-seq software suite, and top-ranking candidates were screened for reactivity by interferon-gamma enzyme linked immunospot assays. Survival analysis was performed comparing neoantigen vaccination, anti-programmed cell death ligand 1 (αPD-L1), or combination therapy.
Compared with the GL261 model, CT2A exhibited immunologic features consistent with human GBM including reduced αPD-L1 sensitivity and hypofunctional TILs. Of the 29 CT2A neoantigens screened, we identified neoantigen-specific CD8+ T-cell responses in the intracranial TIL and draining lymph nodes to two H2-Kb restricted (Epb4H471L and Pomgnt1R497L) and one H2-Db restricted neoantigen (Plin2G332R). Survival analysis showed that therapeutic neoantigen vaccination with Epb4H471L, Pomgnt1R497L, and Plin2G332R, in combination with αPD-L1 treatment was superior to αPD-L1 alone.
We identified endogenous neoantigen specific CD8+ T cells within an αPD-L1 resistant murine GBM and show that neoantigen vaccination significantly augments survival benefit in combination with αPD-L1 treatment. These observations provide important preclinical correlates for GBM immunotherapy trials and support further investigation into the effects of multimodal immunotherapeutic interventions on antiglioma immunity.
尽管在胶质母细胞瘤(GBM)中测试免疫疗法的临床试验结果不一,但针对肿瘤特异性体细胞编码突变(即“新抗原”)的新策略代表了有前景的治疗方法。我们对侵袭性CT2A GBM模型的微环境和新抗原格局进行了表征,以开发一个测试联合检查点阻断和新抗原疫苗接种的平台。
对颅内CT2A和GL261肿瘤浸润淋巴细胞(TIL)进行流式细胞术分析。采用CT2A小鼠GBM的全外显子DNA和RNA测序来鉴定表达的体细胞突变。使用pVAC-seq软件套件鉴定预测的新抗原,并通过干扰素-γ酶联免疫斑点试验筛选排名靠前的候选新抗原来检测其反应性。进行生存分析以比较新抗原疫苗接种、抗程序性细胞死亡配体1(αPD-L1)或联合治疗的效果。
与GL261模型相比,CT2A表现出与人类GBM一致的免疫特征,包括αPD-L1敏感性降低和TIL功能低下。在筛选的29种CT2A新抗原中,我们在颅内TIL和引流淋巴结中鉴定出针对两种H2-Kb限制性(Epb4H471L和Pomgnt1R497L)和一种H2-Db限制性新抗原(Plin2G332R)的新抗原特异性CD8 + T细胞反应。生存分析表明,用Epb4H471L、Pomgnt1R497L和Plin2G332R进行治疗性新抗原疫苗接种并联合αPD-L1治疗优于单独使用αPD-L1治疗。
我们在αPD-L1耐药的小鼠GBM中鉴定出内源性新抗原特异性CD8 + T细胞,并表明新抗原疫苗接种与αPD-L1治疗联合可显著提高生存获益。这些观察结果为GBM免疫治疗试验提供了重要的临床前关联,并支持进一步研究多模式免疫治疗干预对抗胶质瘤免疫的影响。