Suppr超能文献

肺手术患者中强化康复路径与常规管理在阿片类药物暴露和疼痛控制方面的配对比较。

Matched Pairs Comparison of an Enhanced Recovery Pathway Versus Conventional Management on Opioid Exposure and Pain Control in Patients Undergoing Lung Surgery.

机构信息

Department of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX.

Department of Anesthesiology and Perioperative Medicine, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX.

出版信息

Ann Surg. 2021 Dec 1;274(6):1099-1106. doi: 10.1097/SLA.0000000000003587.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

The aim of this study was to assess the effect of an enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) pathway on pain and opioid use following lung resection.

SUMMARY BACKGROUND DATA

A major component ERAS pathways is opioid-sparing analgesia; however, the effect on postoperative pain and opioid use in patients undergoing lung resection is unknown.

METHODS

Following implementation of an ERAS pathway for lung resection, 123 consecutive patients were identified. Patients were propensity-matched 1:1 with a group of consecutive patients (n = 907) undergoing lung resection before ERAS. Differences regarding in-hospital opioid consumption, discharge prescribing of opioids, and postoperative pain scores were examined. Morphine milligram equivalents were separately calculated including and excluding tramadol as an opioid medication.

RESULTS

There were no significant differences between matched patients regarding age, sex, performance status, receipt of preoperative treatment, extent of lung resection, or operative approach. Epidural analgesia was used in 66% of controls and in none of the ERAS group (P < 0.001). The number of adjunct analgesics used postoperatively was greater in the ERAS group (median 3 vs 2, P < 0.001). There was a major reduction in morphine milligram equivalents in the ERAS group whether tramadol was included (median 14.2 vs 57.8, P < 0.001) or excluded (median 2.7 vs 57.8, P < 0.001) and regardless of surgical approach. Average daily pain scores were lower in the ERAS group (median 1.3 vs 1.8, P = 0.004); however, this difference was present only among patients undergoing thoracotomy. The proportion of patients who were prescribed discharge opioids varied whether tramadol was included (96% each group, P = 1.00) or excluded (39% vs 80%, P < 0.001) in the analysis.

CONCLUSIONS

Implementation of an ERAS pathway was associated with effective post-operative analgesia, major reductions in in-hospital consumption of opioids, and reduced pain, compared to conventional management.

摘要

目的

本研究旨在评估术后加速康复(ERAS)方案对肺切除术后疼痛和阿片类药物使用的影响。

背景资料概要

ERAS 方案的一个主要组成部分是阿片类药物节约性镇痛;然而,ERAS 方案对肺切除术后患者的术后疼痛和阿片类药物使用的影响尚不清楚。

方法

在肺切除术后实施 ERAS 方案后,确定了 123 例连续患者。将这些患者与一组连续患者(n = 907)进行 1:1 倾向性匹配,这些患者在 ERAS 之前接受了肺切除术。检查了住院期间阿片类药物消耗、出院时阿片类药物处方和术后疼痛评分的差异。单独计算吗啡毫克当量,包括和不包括曲马多作为阿片类药物。

结果

在年龄、性别、表现状态、术前治疗、肺切除范围或手术方式方面,匹配患者之间没有显著差异。对照组中 66%的患者使用了硬膜外镇痛,而 ERAS 组中没有患者使用(P < 0.001)。ERAS 组术后使用的辅助镇痛药物数量更多(中位数 3 种与 2 种,P < 0.001)。无论是否包括曲马多,ERAS 组的吗啡毫克当量都有显著减少(包括曲马多的中位数为 14.2 与 57.8,P < 0.001;不包括曲马多的中位数为 2.7 与 57.8,P < 0.001),且无论手术方式如何。ERAS 组的平均每日疼痛评分较低(中位数 1.3 与 1.8,P = 0.004);然而,这种差异仅存在于接受开胸手术的患者中。无论在分析中是否包括曲马多(每组 96%,P = 1.00)或排除曲马多(分别为 39%和 80%,P < 0.001),开处方出院阿片类药物的患者比例均有所不同。

结论

与常规治疗相比,实施 ERAS 方案可有效进行术后镇痛,大量减少住院期间阿片类药物的消耗,并减轻疼痛。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验