Widén Julia, Ivarsson Magnus, Schalin Lovisa, Vrouchou Polina, Schwenkglenks Matthias, Heimbürger Olof, Ademi Zanfina, Sutherland C Simone
Quantify Research AB, Stockholm, Sweden.
Vifor Pharma Nordiska AB, Stockholm, Sweden.
Pharmacoeconomics. 2020 Jul;38(7):747-764. doi: 10.1007/s40273-020-00902-w.
Patients with chronic kidney disease (CKD) are commonly treated with renin-angiotensin-aldosterone system inhibitors (RAASi) in order to delay progression of renal disease. However, research has shown that RAASi in CKD patients increases hyperkalaemia (HK) prevalence, which leads to RAASi discontinuation or dose reduction with the loss of benefits on the kidney. Patiromer is a novel therapy for HK treatment and may enable patients to remain on their RAASi regimen. This study aimed to assess the cost-effectiveness of patiromer from a Swedish healthcare perspective.
A Markov model was developed to evaluate the economic outcomes of patiromer versus no patiromer in HK patients with stage 3-4 CKD taking RAASi. The model consisted of six health states reflecting disease progression and hospitalisations. The analysis mainly considered clinical data from the OPAL-HK trial and national costs. The main outcomes of interest were incremental costs (euro [EUR] 2016) and quality-adjusted life years (QALYs), discounted at 3%, and the incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER). Extensive uncertainty analyses were performed.
In comparison to no patiromer, a patiromer patient gained 0.14 QALYs and an incremental cost of EUR 6109 (Swedish krona [SEK] 57,850), yielding an ICER of EUR 43,307 (SEK 410,072)/QALY gained. The results were robust to a range of sensitivity analyses. At a willingness-to-pay threshold of EUR 52,804 (SEK 500,000)/QALY, patiromer had a 50% chance of being cost-effective.
The results indicate that patiromer may demonstrate value for money in Swedish patients with stage 3-4 CKD, by enabling RAASi treatment. However, there is a considerable degree of uncertainty.
慢性肾脏病(CKD)患者通常接受肾素 - 血管紧张素 - 醛固酮系统抑制剂(RAASi)治疗,以延缓肾脏疾病进展。然而,研究表明,CKD患者使用RAASi会增加高钾血症(HK)的患病率,这导致RAASi停用或剂量减少,从而失去对肾脏的益处。帕替罗姆是一种治疗HK的新型疗法,可能使患者能够继续使用RAASi治疗方案。本研究旨在从瑞典医疗保健的角度评估帕替罗姆的成本效益。
建立马尔可夫模型,以评估帕替罗姆与未使用帕替罗姆对接受RAASi治疗的3 - 4期CKD合并HK患者的经济结局。该模型由反映疾病进展和住院情况的六个健康状态组成。分析主要考虑了OPAL - HK试验的临床数据和国家成本。主要关注的结局是增量成本(2016年欧元[EUR])和质量调整生命年(QALYs),按3%进行贴现,以及增量成本效益比(ICER)。进行了广泛的不确定性分析。
与未使用帕替罗姆相比,使用帕替罗姆的患者获得了0.14个QALYs,增量成本为6109欧元(瑞典克朗[SEK]57,850),ICER为每获得一个QALY 43,307欧元(SEK 410,072)。结果在一系列敏感性分析中具有稳健性。在支付意愿阈值为每QALY 52,804欧元(SEK 500,000)时,帕替罗姆有50%的可能性具有成本效益。
结果表明,帕替罗姆通过使患者能够接受RAASi治疗,可能对瑞典3 - 4期CKD患者具有性价比优势。然而,存在相当程度的不确定性。