Suppr超能文献

传统唇侧和舌侧固定正畸矫治器骨代谢生化标志物的比较

Comparison of biochemical markers of bone metabolism between conventional labial and lingual fixed orthodontic appliances.

作者信息

Gujar A N, Baeshen H A, Alhazmi A, Ghoussoub M S, Raj A T, Bhandi S, Sarode S C, Awan K H, Birkhed D, Patil S

机构信息

Department of Orthodontics, KLES Institute of Dental Sciences, Bangalore, Karnataka, India.

Department of Orthodontics, College of Dentistry, King Abdulaziz University, Jeddah, Saudi Arabia.

出版信息

Niger J Clin Pract. 2020 Apr;23(4):568-573. doi: 10.4103/njcp.njcp_501_19.

Abstract

OBJECTIVES

The applied orthodontic force causes remodeling of the periodontium through the selective release of cytokines causing resorption of bone, enabling controlled movement of the tooth. This study compared the cytokine profile between patients treated with conventional labial and lingual fixed orthodontic appliances.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

The study included 80 patients in need of orthodontic treatment, out of which 40 patients were treated by the labial fixed appliance and 40 by the lingual fixed appliance. Gingival crevicular fluid (GCF) specimens were gathered from both the groups using a microcapillary pipette. The samples were collected at the beginning of the treatment and after 21 days. Enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay was performed to evaluate the cytokine levels.

RESULTS

Interleukin (IL)-1α, 1β, 2, 8, and tumor necrosis factor-alpha (TNF-α) levels were significantly high (P < 0.001) in GCF of participants treated with conventional labial fixed appliance. IL-1α, 1β, 2, 6, 8, and TNF-α levels were significantly high (P < 0.001) in GCF of participants treated by the lingual fixed appliance. The concentrations of TNF-α and IL-1β were increased higher than other cytokines in both the treatment groups.

CONCLUSION

Overall, the lingual fixed appliance had higher cytokine levels than a labial fixed appliance. Analyzing the GCF cytokine levels during orthodontic treatment could provide an ideal platform for monitoring the progress of the treatment.

摘要

目的

正畸施加的力通过细胞因子的选择性释放引起牙周组织重塑,这些细胞因子会导致骨吸收,从而实现牙齿的可控移动。本研究比较了使用传统唇侧和舌侧固定正畸矫治器治疗的患者之间的细胞因子谱。

患者与方法

该研究纳入了80名需要正畸治疗的患者,其中40名患者采用唇侧固定矫治器治疗,40名采用舌侧固定矫治器治疗。使用微量毛细管移液器从两组收集龈沟液(GCF)样本。在治疗开始时和21天后收集样本。进行酶联免疫吸附测定以评估细胞因子水平。

结果

使用传统唇侧固定矫治器治疗的参与者的GCF中白细胞介素(IL)-1α、1β、2、8和肿瘤坏死因子-α(TNF-α)水平显著升高(P < 0.001)。采用舌侧固定矫治器治疗的参与者的GCF中IL-1α、1β、2、6、8和TNF-α水平显著升高(P < 0.001)。在两个治疗组中,TNF-α和IL-1β的浓度升高幅度高于其他细胞因子。

结论

总体而言,舌侧固定矫治器的细胞因子水平高于唇侧固定矫治器。分析正畸治疗期间的GCF细胞因子水平可为监测治疗进展提供理想平台。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验