Suppr超能文献

在 ALEX 研究中,未经治疗的晚期 ALK 阳性非小细胞肺癌患者的更新总生存和最终无进展生存数据。

Updated overall survival and final progression-free survival data for patients with treatment-naive advanced ALK-positive non-small-cell lung cancer in the ALEX study.

机构信息

State Key Laboratory of Translational Oncology, Chinese University of Hong Kong, Shatin, NT, Hong Kong.

University of Colorado, Denver, USA.

出版信息

Ann Oncol. 2020 Aug;31(8):1056-1064. doi: 10.1016/j.annonc.2020.04.478. Epub 2020 May 11.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

The ALEX study demonstrated significantly improved progression-free survival (PFS) with alectinib versus crizotinib in treatment-naive ALK-positive non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) at the primary data cut-off (9 February 2017). We report mature PFS (cut-off: 30 November 2018) and overall survival (OS) data up to 5 years (cut-off: 29 November 2019).

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Patients with stage III/IV ALK-positive NSCLC were randomized to receive twice-daily alectinib 600 mg (n = 152) or crizotinib 250 mg (n = 151) until disease progression, toxicity, withdrawal or death. Primary end point: investigator-assessed PFS. Secondary end points included objective response rate, OS and safety.

RESULTS

Mature PFS data showed significantly prolonged investigator-assessed PFS with alectinib [hazard ratio (HR) 0.43, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.32-0.58; median PFS 34.8 versus 10.9 months crizotinib]. Median duration of OS follow-up: 48.2 months alectinib, 23.3 months crizotinib. OS data remain immature (37% of events). Median OS was not reached with alectinib versus 57.4 months with crizotinib (stratified HR 0.67, 95% CI 0.46-0.98). The 5-year OS rate was 62.5% (95% CI 54.3-70.8) with alectinib and 45.5% (95% CI 33.6-57.4) with crizotinib, with 34.9% and 8.6% of patients still on study treatment, respectively. The OS benefit of alectinib was seen in patients with central nervous system metastases at baseline [HR 0.58 (95% CI 0.34-1.00)] and those without [HR 0.76 (95% CI 0.45-1.26)]. Median treatment duration was longer with alectinib (28.1 versus 10.8 months), and no new safety signals were observed.

CONCLUSIONS

Mature PFS data from ALEX confirmed significant improvement in PFS for alectinib over crizotinib in ALK-positive NSCLC. OS data remain immature, with a higher 5-year OS rate with alectinib versus crizotinib. This is the first global randomized study to show clinically meaningful improvement in OS for a next-generation tyrosine kinase inhibitor versus crizotinib in treatment-naive ALK-positive NSCLC.

CLINICAL TRIALS NUMBER

NCT02075840.

摘要

背景

ALEX 研究在主要数据截止日期(2017 年 2 月 9 日)时显示,与克唑替尼相比,艾乐替尼在初治 ALK 阳性非小细胞肺癌(NSCLC)患者中显著改善了无进展生存期(PFS)。我们报告了截至 2018 年 11 月 30 日成熟的 PFS(截止日期)和截至 2019 年 11 月 29 日的总生存期(OS)数据。

患者和方法

III/IV 期 ALK 阳性 NSCLC 患者被随机分配接受每日两次艾乐替尼 600mg(n=152)或克唑替尼 250mg(n=151)治疗,直到疾病进展、毒性、停药或死亡。主要终点:研究者评估的 PFS。次要终点包括客观缓解率、OS 和安全性。

结果

成熟的 PFS 数据显示,艾乐替尼显著延长了研究者评估的 PFS[风险比(HR)0.43,95%置信区间(CI)0.32-0.58;中位 PFS 为 34.8 个月 vs 克唑替尼的 10.9 个月]。OS 数据仍不成熟(37%的事件)。中位 OS 随访时间:艾乐替尼为 48.2 个月,克唑替尼为 23.3 个月。未达到艾乐替尼的中位 OS 期,为 57.4 个月(分层 HR 0.67,95%CI 0.46-0.98)。艾乐替尼的 5 年 OS 率为 62.5%(95%CI 54.3-70.8),克唑替尼为 45.5%(95%CI 33.6-57.4),分别有 34.9%和 8.6%的患者仍在接受研究治疗。艾乐替尼在基线时有中枢神经系统转移的患者中观察到 OS 获益[HR 0.58(95%CI 0.34-1.00)]和无中枢神经系统转移的患者[HR 0.76(95%CI 0.45-1.26)]。艾乐替尼的中位治疗时间更长(28.1 个月 vs 10.8 个月),未观察到新的安全性信号。

结论

ALEX 的成熟 PFS 数据证实,与克唑替尼相比,艾乐替尼在 ALK 阳性 NSCLC 患者中显著改善了 PFS。OS 数据仍不成熟,与克唑替尼相比,艾乐替尼的 5 年 OS 率更高。这是第一项全球随机研究,表明下一代酪氨酸激酶抑制剂艾乐替尼在初治 ALK 阳性 NSCLC 患者中与克唑替尼相比具有临床意义的 OS 改善。

临床试验编号

NCT02075840。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验