Suppr超能文献

COVID-19大流行期间癌症患者的虚拟管理:基于网络的问卷调查研究

Virtual Management of Patients With Cancer During the COVID-19 Pandemic: Web-Based Questionnaire Study.

作者信息

Tashkandi Emad, Zeeneldin Ahmed, AlAbdulwahab Amal, Elemam Omima, Elsamany Shereef, Jastaniah Wasil, Abdullah Shaker, Alfayez Mohammad, Jazieh Abdul Rahman, Al-Shamsi Humaid O

机构信息

Department of Medical Oncology, Oncology Center, King Abdullah Medical City, Makkah, Saudi Arabia.

College of Medicine, Umm AlQura University, Makkah, Saudi Arabia.

出版信息

J Med Internet Res. 2020 Jun 24;22(6):e19691. doi: 10.2196/19691.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

During the coronavirus disease (COVID-19) pandemic, patients with cancer in rural settings and distant geographical areas will be affected the most by curfews. Virtual management (telemedicine) has been shown to reduce health costs and improve access to care.

OBJECTIVE

The aim of this survey is to understand oncologists' awareness of and views on virtual management, challenges, and preferences, as well as their priorities regarding the prescribing of anticancer treatments during the COVID-19 pandemic.

METHODS

We created a self-administrated electronic survey about the virtual management of patients with cancer during the COVID-19 pandemic. We evaluated its clinical sensibility and pilot tested the instrument. We surveyed practicing oncologists in Gulf and Arab countries using snowball sampling via emails and social media networks. Reminders were sent 1 and 2 weeks later using SurveyMonkey.

RESULTS

We received 222 responses from validated oncologists from April 2-22, 2020. An awareness of virtual clinics, virtual multidisciplinary teams, and virtual prescriptions was reported by 182 (82%), 175 (79%), and 166 (75%) respondents, respectively. Reported challenges associated with virtual management were the lack of physical exam (n=134, 60%), patients' awareness and access (n=131, 59%), the lack of physical attendance of patients (n=93, 42%), information technology (IT) support (n=82, 37%), and the safety of virtual management (n=78, 35%). Overall, 111 (50%) and 107 (48%) oncologists did not prefer the virtual prescription of chemotherapy and novel immunotherapy, respectively. However, 188 (85%), 165 (74%), and 127 (57%) oncologists preferred the virtual prescription of hormonal therapy, bone modifying agents, and targeted therapy, respectively. In total, 184 (83%), 183 (83%), and 176 (80%) oncologists preferred to continue neoadjuvant, adjuvant, and perioperative treatments, respectively. Overall, 118 (53%) respondents preferred to continue first-line palliative treatment, in contrast to 68 (30%) and 47 (21%) respondents indicating a preference to interrupt second- and third-line palliative treatment, respectively. For administration of virtual prescriptions, all respondents preferred the oral route and 118 (53%) preferred the subcutaneous route. In contrast, 193 (87%) did not prefer the intravenous route for virtual prescriptions. Overall, 102 (46%) oncologists responded that they would "definitely" prefer to manage patients with cancer virtually.

CONCLUSIONS

Oncologists have a high level of awareness of virtual management. Although their survey responses indicated that second- and third-line palliative treatments should be interrupted, they stated that neoadjuvant, adjuvant, perioperative, and first-line palliative treatments should continue. Our results confirm that oncologists' views on the priority of anticancer treatments are consistent with the evolving literature during the COVID-19 pandemic. Challenges to virtual management should be addressed to improve the care of patients with cancer.

摘要

背景

在冠状病毒病(COVID-19)大流行期间,农村地区和偏远地理区域的癌症患者将受到宵禁的影响最大。虚拟管理(远程医疗)已被证明可降低医疗成本并改善医疗服务的可及性。

目的

本次调查的目的是了解肿瘤学家对虚拟管理的认识和看法、挑战和偏好,以及他们在COVID-19大流行期间开具抗癌治疗处方的优先事项。

方法

我们创建了一项关于COVID-19大流行期间癌症患者虚拟管理的自填式电子调查问卷。我们评估了其临床敏感性并对该工具进行了预测试。我们通过电子邮件和社交媒体网络采用滚雪球抽样的方式对海湾和阿拉伯国家的执业肿瘤学家进行了调查。1周和2周后使用SurveyMonkey发送提醒。

结果

2020年4月2日至22日,我们收到了来自经验证的肿瘤学家的222份回复。分别有182名(82%)、175名(79%)和166名(75%)受访者表示了解虚拟诊所、虚拟多学科团队和虚拟处方。报告的与虚拟管理相关的挑战包括缺乏体格检查(n=134,60%)、患者的认识和可及性(n=131,59%)、患者缺乏亲自到场(n=93,42%)、信息技术(IT)支持(n=82,37%)以及虚拟管理的安全性(n=78,35%)。总体而言,分别有111名(50%)和107名(48%)肿瘤学家不倾向于虚拟开具化疗和新型免疫治疗处方。然而,分别有188名(85%)、165名(74%)和127名(57%)肿瘤学家倾向于虚拟开具激素治疗、骨改良剂和靶向治疗处方。总体而言,分别有184名(83%)、183名(83%)和176名(80%)肿瘤学家倾向于继续进行新辅助、辅助和围手术期治疗。总体而言,118名(53%)受访者倾向于继续一线姑息治疗,相比之下,分别有68名(30%)和47名(21%)受访者表示倾向于中断二线和三线姑息治疗。对于虚拟处方的给药方式,所有受访者都倾向于口服途径,118名(53%)倾向于皮下途径。相比之下,193名(87%)不倾向于通过静脉途径进行虚拟处方给药。总体而言,102名(46%)肿瘤学家表示他们“肯定”更倾向于通过虚拟方式管理癌症患者。

结论

肿瘤学家对虚拟管理有较高的认识水平。尽管他们的调查回复表明二线和三线姑息治疗应中断,但他们表示新辅助、辅助、围手术期和一线姑息治疗应继续。我们的结果证实,肿瘤学家对抗癌治疗优先顺序的看法与COVID-19大流行期间不断发展的文献一致。应解决虚拟管理的挑战,以改善癌症患者的护理。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验