Epidemiology, African Institute of Public Health, Ouagadougou, Kadiogo, Burkina Faso
Biomedicine and Public Health, Institut de Recherche en Sciences de la Sante, Ouagadougou, Centre, Burkina Faso.
BMJ Open. 2020 Jun 7;10(6):e036121. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2019-036121.
To assess and compare the quality of intrapartum and immediate postpartum care across levels of healthcare in Burkina Faso and Côte d'Ivoire using validated process indicators.
Health facility-based cross-sectional study with direct observation of healthcare workers' practices while caring for mother-newborn pairs during intrapartum and immediate postpartum periods.
Primary healthcare facilities and their corresponding referral hospitals in the Central-North region in Burkina Faso and the Agneby-Tiassa-Mé region in Côte d'Ivoire.
Healthcare providers who care for mother-newborn pairs during intrapartum and immediate postpartum periods, the labouring women and their newborns after childbirth.
Adherence to essential best practices (EBPs) at four pause points in each birth event and the overall quality score based on the level of adherence to the set of EBPs observed for a selected pause point.
A total of 532 and 627 labouring women were included in Burkina Faso and Côte d'Ivoire, respectively. Overall, the compliance with EBPs was insufficient at all the four pause points, even though it varied widely from one EBP to another. The adherence was very low with respect to hand hygiene practices: the care provider wore sterile gloves for vaginal examination in only 7.96% cases (95% CI 5.66% to 11.06%) in Burkina Faso and the care provider washed hands before examination in 6.71% cases (95% CI 3.94% to 11.20%) in Côte d'Ivoire. The adherence was very high with respect to thermal management of newborns in both countries (>90%). The overall mean quality scores were consistently higher in referral hospitals in Burkina Faso at all pause points excluding immediate post partum.
Women delivering in healthcare facilities do not always receive proven EBPs needed to prevent poor childbirth outcomes. There is a need for quality improvement interventions.
使用经过验证的过程指标,评估和比较布基纳法索和科特迪瓦各级医疗保健机构的分娩期和产后即刻护理质量。
在布基纳法索中北部地区和科特迪瓦 Agneby-Tiassa-Mé 地区的基层医疗保健设施及其相应的转诊医院进行基于卫生保健机构的横断面研究,直接观察医护人员在分娩期和产后即刻期间照顾母婴对的实践情况。
在分娩期和产后即刻期间照顾母婴对的医护人员、分娩后的产妇及其新生儿。
在每个分娩事件的四个停顿点上遵守基本最佳实践(EBPs)的情况,以及基于对所选停顿点观察到的一组 EBPs 的遵守程度的总体质量评分。
布基纳法索和科特迪瓦分别纳入了 532 名和 627 名产妇。总体而言,在所有四个停顿点上,EBPs 的遵守情况都不足,尽管每个 EBP 的遵守情况差异很大。手部卫生实践的遵守情况非常低:在布基纳法索,只有 7.96%(95%CI 5.66%至 11.06%)的情况下医护人员在阴道检查时戴无菌手套,而在科特迪瓦,医护人员在检查前洗手的情况仅占 6.71%(95%CI 3.94%至 11.20%)。两国对新生儿的热管理都非常重视(>90%)。在布基纳法索的所有停顿点(产后即刻除外),转诊医院的整体平均质量评分始终较高。
在医疗保健机构分娩的妇女并不总是能获得预防不良分娩结局所需的经过验证的 EBPs。需要进行质量改进干预。