Department of Biological Sciences; Department of Cardiovascular and Metabolic Sciences, Cleveland Clinic Foundation, 9500 Euclid Avenue, Cleveland, Ohio, United States.
Department of Physiology and Pharmacology, The University of Toledo College of Medicine and Life Sciences, Toledo, Ohio, United States.
Physiol Behav. 2020 Oct 15;225:113048. doi: 10.1016/j.physbeh.2020.113048. Epub 2020 Jul 3.
Decreases in energy stores requires negative energy balance where caloric expenditure exceeds energy intake, which can induce adaptive thermogenesis-the reduction of energy expenditure (EE) beyond that accounted for by the weight lost. Adaptive thermogenesis varies between individuals. The component of total daily EE responsible for the interindividual variation in adaptive thermogenesis was investigated in this study, using a rat model that differs in obesity propensity and physical activity. Total daily EE and physical activity were examined before and after 21 days of 50% calorie restriction in male and female rats with lean and obesity-prone phenotypes-rats selectively bred for high and low intrinsic aerobic capacity (HCR and LCR, respectively). Calorie restriction significantly decreased EE more than was predicted by loss of weight and lean mass, demonstrating adaptive thermogenesis. Within sex, HCR and LCR did not significantly differ in resting EE. However, the calorie restriction-induced suppression in non-resting EE, which includes activity EE, was significantly greater in HCR than in LCR; this phenotypic difference was significant for both male and female rats. Calorie restriction also significantly suppressed physical activity levels more in HCR than LCR. When VO was assessed in male rats, calorie restriction significantly decreased O consumption without significantly affecting running performance (running time, distance), indicating increased energy efficiency. Percent weight loss did not significantly differ between groups. Altogether, these results suggest that individual differences in calorie restriction-induced adaptive thermogenesis may be accounted for by variation in aerobic capacity. Moreover, it is likely that activity EE, not resting or basal metabolism, may explain or predict the variation in individuals' adaptive thermogenesis.
能量储存减少需要负能量平衡,即热量消耗超过能量摄入,这会导致适应性产热——即除了体重减轻之外的能量消耗减少。适应性产热因人而异。本研究使用肥胖倾向和体力活动不同的大鼠模型,研究了总每日能量消耗中负责适应性产热个体间差异的成分。在雄性和雌性具有瘦型和肥胖倾向表型的大鼠(分别为高和低内在有氧能力选择繁殖的大鼠)中,检查了总每日能量消耗和体力活动,然后进行了 21 天 50%热量限制。热量限制显著降低了能量消耗,超过了体重和瘦体重减轻的预测,表明存在适应性产热。在性别内,静息能量消耗在 HCR 和 LCR 之间没有显著差异。然而,非静息能量消耗(包括活动能量消耗)在 HCR 中的抑制作用明显大于 LCR,这种表型差异在雄性和雌性大鼠中均显著。热量限制也显著降低了 HCR 中的体力活动水平,而不是 LCR。当评估雄性大鼠的 VO 时,热量限制显著降低了 O 消耗,而没有显著影响跑步表现(跑步时间、距离),表明能量效率提高。体重减轻百分比在各组之间没有显著差异。总之,这些结果表明,适应性产热的热量限制诱导个体差异可能归因于有氧能力的差异。此外,活动能量消耗,而不是静息或基础代谢,可能解释或预测个体适应性产热的变化。