Suppr超能文献

欧盟-ToxRisk 方法文件、数据处理和化学测试管道,用于监管新方法的应用。

The EU-ToxRisk method documentation, data processing and chemical testing pipeline for the regulatory use of new approach methods.

机构信息

In Vitro Toxicology and Biomedicine, Department Inaugurated by the Doerenkamp-Zbinden Foundation, University of Konstanz, Universitaetsstr. 10, 78457, Konstanz, Germany.

Konstanz Research School Chemical Biology, University of Konstanz, 78457, Konstanz, Germany.

出版信息

Arch Toxicol. 2020 Jul;94(7):2435-2461. doi: 10.1007/s00204-020-02802-6. Epub 2020 Jul 6.

Abstract

Hazard assessment, based on new approach methods (NAM), requires the use of batteries of assays, where individual tests may be contributed by different laboratories. A unified strategy for such collaborative testing is presented. It details all procedures required to allow test information to be usable for integrated hazard assessment, strategic project decisions and/or for regulatory purposes. The EU-ToxRisk project developed a strategy to provide regulatorily valid data, and exemplified this using a panel of > 20 assays (with > 50 individual endpoints), each exposed to 19 well-known test compounds (e.g. rotenone, colchicine, mercury, paracetamol, rifampicine, paraquat, taxol). Examples of strategy implementation are provided for all aspects required to ensure data validity: (i) documentation of test methods in a publicly accessible database; (ii) deposition of standard operating procedures (SOP) at the European Union DB-ALM repository; (iii) test readiness scoring accoding to defined criteria; (iv) disclosure of the pipeline for data processing; (v) link of uncertainty measures and metadata to the data; (vi) definition of test chemicals, their handling and their behavior in test media; (vii) specification of the test purpose and overall evaluation plans. Moreover, data generation was exemplified by providing results from 25 reporter assays. A complete evaluation of the entire test battery will be described elsewhere. A major learning from the retrospective analysis of this large testing project was the need for thorough definitions of the above strategy aspects, ideally in form of a study pre-registration, to allow adequate interpretation of the data and to ensure overall scientific/toxicological validity.

摘要

危害评估,基于新方法途径(NAM),需要使用一系列的检测方法,其中单个测试可能由不同的实验室提供。本文提出了一种用于此类协作测试的统一策略。它详细说明了允许测试信息可用于综合危害评估、战略项目决策和/或监管目的的所有程序。EU-ToxRisk 项目制定了提供监管有效的数据的策略,并使用了一个包含超过 20 种检测方法(超过 50 个单独的终点)的小组来举例说明,每种方法都接触了 19 种已知的测试化合物(例如鱼藤酮、秋水仙碱、汞、对乙酰氨基酚、利福平、百草枯、紫杉醇)。为确保数据有效性所需的所有方面都提供了策略实施的示例:(i)在公共可访问数据库中记录测试方法;(ii)在欧洲联盟 DB-ALM 存储库中存放标准操作规程(SOP);(iii)根据定义的标准对测试准备情况进行评分;(iv)公开数据处理的流水线;(v)将不确定性度量和元数据与数据相关联;(vi)定义测试化学品、它们的处理方式以及它们在测试介质中的行为;(vii)指定测试目的和总体评估计划。此外,还提供了 25 种报告检测方法的结果来说明数据生成。整个测试电池组的完整评估将在其他地方描述。从这个大型测试项目的回顾性分析中得到的一个重要经验教训是需要对上述策略方面进行彻底定义,理想情况下是在研究预注册的形式下,以便对数据进行充分解释并确保整体科学/毒理学有效性。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1886/7367925/5718e1fd3a65/204_2020_2802_Fig1_HTML.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验