Percie du Sert Nathalie, Hurst Viki, Ahluwalia Amrita, Alam Sabina, Avey Marc T, Baker Monya, Browne William J, Clark Alejandra, Cuthill Innes C, Dirnagl Ulrich, Emerson Michael, Garner Paul, Holgate Stephen T, Howells David W, Karp Natasha A, Lazic Stanley E, Lidster Katie, MacCallum Catriona J, Macleod Malcolm, Pearl Esther J, Petersen Ole H, Rawle Frances, Reynolds Penny, Rooney Kieron, Sena Emily S, Silberberg Shai D, Steckler Thomas, Würbel Hanno
Head of Experimental Design and Reporting, NC3Rs, London, United Kingdom.
Science Manager - Experimental Design and Reporting, NC3Rs, London, United Kingdom.
J Cereb Blood Flow Metab. 2020 Sep;40(9):1769-1777. doi: 10.1177/0271678X20943823. Epub 2020 Jul 14.
Reproducible science requires transparent reporting. The ARRIVE guidelines (Animal Research: Reporting of In Vivo Experiments) were originally developed in 2010 to improve the reporting of animal research. They consist of a checklist of information to include in publications describing in vivo experiments to enable others to scrutinise the work adequately, evaluate its methodological rigour, and reproduce the methods and results. Despite considerable levels of endorsement by funders and journals over the years, adherence to the guidelines has been inconsistent, and the anticipated improvements in the quality of reporting in animal research publications have not been achieved. Here, we introduce ARRIVE 2.0. The guidelines have been updated and information reorganised to facilitate their use in practice. We used a Delphi exercise to prioritise and divide the items of the guidelines into 2 sets, the "ARRIVE Essential 10," which constitutes the minimum requirement, and the "Recommended Set," which describes the research context. This division facilitates improved reporting of animal research by supporting a stepwise approach to implementation. This helps journal editors and reviewers verify that the most important items are being reported in manuscripts. We have also developed the accompanying Explanation and Elaboration document, which serves (1) to explain the rationale behind each item in the guidelines, (2) to clarify key concepts, and (3) to provide illustrative examples. We aim, through these changes, to help ensure that researchers, reviewers, and journal editors are better equipped to improve the rigour and transparency of the scientific process and thus reproducibility.
可重复性科学需要透明的报告。ARRIVE指南(动物研究:体内实验报告)最初于2010年制定,旨在改善动物研究的报告情况。它们由一份信息清单组成,这些信息应包含在描述体内实验的出版物中,以便其他人能够充分审查该研究、评估其方法的严谨性,并重现实验方法和结果。尽管多年来资助者和期刊给予了相当程度的认可,但对这些指南的遵守情况并不一致,动物研究出版物报告质量的预期提升也未实现。在此,我们推出ARRIVE 2.0。指南已更新,信息也进行了重新组织,以方便在实践中使用。我们通过德尔菲法将指南中的项目进行了优先排序并分为两组,即构成最低要求的“ARRIVE基本10项”和描述研究背景的“推荐组”。这种划分通过支持逐步实施的方法,促进了动物研究报告的改进。这有助于期刊编辑和审稿人核实稿件中是否报告了最重要的项目。我们还编写了配套的《解释与阐述》文件,其作用包括:(1)解释指南中每个项目背后的基本原理;(2)阐明关键概念;(3)提供示例。我们旨在通过这些改变,帮助确保研究人员、审稿人和期刊编辑能更好地提高科学过程的严谨性和透明度,从而提高可重复性。