A. T. Malik, J. H. Alexander, J. L. Mayerson, S. N. Khan, T. J. Scharschmidt, Department of Orthopaedics, the James Cancer Hospital and Solove Research Institute, the Ohio State University Wexner Medical Center, Columbus, OH, USA.
Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2020 Oct;478(10):2284-2295. doi: 10.1097/CORR.0000000000001361.
The management of primary malignant bone tumors in patients with metastatic disease at presentation remains a challenge. Although surgical resection has been a mainstay in the management of nonmetastatic malignant bone tumors, there is a lack of large-scale evidence-based guidance on whether surgery of the primary site/tumor improves overall survival in malignant bone tumors with metastatic disease at presentation.
QUESTIONS/PURPOSES: (1) Is surgical resection of the primary tumor associated with improved overall survival in patients with primary malignant bone tumors who have metastatic disease at presentation? (2) What other factors are associated with improved and/or poor overall survival?
The 2004 to 2016 National Cancer Database (NCDB), a national registry containing data from more than 34 million cancer patients in the United States, was queried using International Classification of Diseases, 3rd Edition, topographical codes to identify patients with primary malignant bone tumors of the extremities (C40.0-C40.3, C40.8, and C40.9) and/or pelvis (C41.4). The NCDB was preferred over other national cancer registries (that is, the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results database) because it includes a specific variable that codes for patients who received additional surgeries at metastatic sites. Patients with malignant bone tumors of the head or skull, trunk, and spinal column were excluded because these patients are not routinely encountered and treated by orthopaedic oncologists. Histologic codes were used to categorize the tumors into the following groups: osteosarcomas, chondrosarcomas, and Ewing sarcomas. Patients whose tumors were classified as Stage 1, 2, or 3 based on American Joint Commission of Cancer guidelines were excluded. Only patients who presented with metastatic disease were included in the final study sample. The study sample was divided into two distinct groups: those who underwent surgical resection of the primary tumor and those who did not receive any operation for the primary tumor. A total of 2288 patients with primary malignant bone tumors (1121 osteosarcomas, 345 chondrosarcomas, and 822 Ewing sarcomas) with metastatic disease at presentation were included, of whom 46% (1053 of 2288) underwent surgical resection of the primary site. Thirty-three percent (348 of 1053) of patients undergoing surgical resection of the primary site also underwent additional resection of metastases. Patients undergoing surgical resection of the primary site typically were younger than 18 years, lived further from a facility, had tumors involving the upper or lower extremity, had a diagnosis of osteosarcoma or chondrosarcoma, and had a greater tumor size and higher tumor grade at presentation. To account for baseline differences within the patient population and to adjust for additional confounding variables, multivariate Cox regression analyses were used to assess whether undergoing surgical resection of the primary tumor was associated with improved overall survival, after controlling for differences in baseline demographics, tumor characteristics (grade, location, histologic type, and tumor size), and treatment patterns (resection of distant or regional metastatic sites, positive or negative surgical margins, and use of radiation therapy or chemotherapy). Additional sensitivity analyses, stratified by histologic type for osteosarcomas, chondrosarcomas, and Ewing sarcomas, were used to assess factors associated with overall survival for each tumor type.
After controlling for differences in baseline demographics, tumor characteristics, and treatment patterns, we found that surgical resection of the primary site was associated with reduced overall mortality compared with those who did not have a resection of the primary site (hazard ratio 0.42 [95% confidence interval 0.36 to 0.49]; p < 0.001). Among other factors, in the stratified analysis, radiation therapy was associated with improved overall survival for patients with Ewing sarcoma (HR 0.71 [95% CI 0.57 to 0.88]; p = 0.002) but not for those with osteosarcoma (HR 1.14 [95% CI 0.91 to 1.43]; p = 0.643) or chondrosarcoma (HR 1.0 [95 % CI 0.78 to 1.50]; p = 0.643). Chemotherapy was associated with improved overall survival for those with osteosarcoma (HR 0.50 [95% CI 0.39 to 0.64]; p < 0.001) and those with chondrosarcoma (HR 0.62 [95% CI 0.45 to 0.85]; p = 0.003) but not those with Ewing sarcoma (HR 0.7 [95% CI 0.46 to 1.35]; p = 0.385).
Surgical resection of the primary site was associated with an overall survival advantage in patients with primary malignant bone tumors who presented with metastatic disease. Further research, using more detailed data on metastatic sites (such as, size, location, number, and treatment), chemotherapy regimen and location of radiation (primary or metastatic site) is warranted to better understand which patients will have improved overall survival and/or a benefit in the quality of life from resecting their primary malignant tumor if they present with metastatic disease at diagnosis.
Level III, therapeutic study.
对于初诊时合并转移性疾病的原发性恶性骨肿瘤患者,其肿瘤的管理仍然是一个挑战。尽管手术切除一直是治疗非转移性恶性骨肿瘤的主要方法,但对于是否切除原发性肿瘤/肿瘤是否能改善初诊时合并转移性疾病的恶性骨肿瘤患者的总体生存率,目前缺乏基于大规模证据的指导。
问题/目的:(1)对于初诊时合并转移性疾病的原发性恶性骨肿瘤患者,手术切除原发性肿瘤是否与总体生存率的提高相关?(2)还有哪些因素与改善和/或预后不良相关?
我们使用美国国家癌症数据库(NCDB)进行了 2004 年至 2016 年的查询,该数据库是一个包含美国 3400 多万癌症患者数据的国家注册中心,使用国际疾病分类第 3 版(ICD-3)的解剖学编码,对四肢(C40.0-C40.3、C40.8 和 C40.9)和/或骨盆(C41.4)原发性恶性骨肿瘤的患者进行了识别。与其他国家癌症登记处(如监测、流行病学和最终结果数据库)相比,我们更喜欢使用 NCDB,因为它包含一个特定的变量,可以对在转移性部位接受额外手术的患者进行编码。排除了头部或颅骨、躯干和脊柱的恶性骨肿瘤患者,因为这些患者通常不会由骨肿瘤医生遇到和治疗。我们使用组织学编码将肿瘤分为以下几类:骨肉瘤、软骨肉瘤和尤文肉瘤。基于美国癌症联合委员会(AJCC)指南的 I 期、II 期或 III 期患者被排除在外。只有在初诊时合并转移性疾病的患者才被纳入最终的研究样本。研究样本分为两组:一组接受了原发性肿瘤的手术切除,另一组未对原发性肿瘤进行任何手术。共有 2288 例初诊时合并转移性疾病的原发性恶性骨肿瘤患者(1121 例骨肉瘤、345 例软骨肉瘤和 822 例尤文肉瘤)被纳入研究,其中 46%(1053 例)接受了原发性肿瘤的手术切除。在接受原发性肿瘤手术切除的 1053 例患者中,33%(348 例)还接受了转移灶的额外切除术。接受原发性肿瘤手术切除的患者通常比未接受手术的患者更年轻、居住的地方离医院更远、肿瘤累及上肢或下肢、诊断为骨肉瘤或软骨肉瘤,并且在初诊时肿瘤的大小和分级更高。为了考虑患者人群中的基线差异,并调整其他混杂变量,我们使用多变量 Cox 回归分析,在控制了基线人口统计学、肿瘤特征(分级、位置、组织学类型和肿瘤大小)和治疗模式(远处或局部转移灶的切除术、阳性或阴性手术切缘、以及放疗或化疗的使用)差异后,评估了是否切除原发性肿瘤与改善总体生存率相关。我们还对骨肉瘤、软骨肉瘤和尤文肉瘤的组织学类型进行了分层敏感性分析,以评估与每种肿瘤类型的总体生存率相关的因素。
在控制了基线人口统计学、肿瘤特征和治疗模式的差异后,我们发现与未行原发性肿瘤切除术的患者相比,行原发性肿瘤切除术与降低总死亡率相关(风险比 0.42[95%置信区间 0.36 至 0.49];p<0.001)。在其他因素中,在分层分析中,对于尤文肉瘤患者,放疗与总体生存率的提高相关(HR 0.71[95%置信区间 0.57 至 0.88];p=0.002),但对于骨肉瘤患者(HR 1.14[95%置信区间 0.91 至 1.43];p=0.643)或软骨肉瘤患者(HR 1.0[95%置信区间 0.78 至 1.50];p=0.643)则没有相关性。对于骨肉瘤患者(HR 0.50[95%置信区间 0.39 至 0.64];p<0.001)和软骨肉瘤患者(HR 0.62[95%置信区间 0.45 至 0.85];p=0.003),化疗与总体生存率的提高相关,但对于尤文肉瘤患者(HR 0.7[95%置信区间 0.46 至 1.35];p=0.385)则没有相关性。
对于初诊时合并转移性疾病的原发性恶性骨肿瘤患者,手术切除原发性肿瘤与总体生存率的提高相关。需要进一步研究,使用关于转移性部位的更详细数据(如大小、位置、数量和治疗)、化疗方案和放疗部位(原发性或转移性部位),以更好地了解哪些患者如果在初诊时合并转移性疾病,切除其原发性恶性肿瘤后,总体生存率和/或生活质量的改善将受益。
III 级,治疗性研究。