Suppr超能文献

社区居住老年人肌少症三种筛查方法的比较。

Comparison of Three Screening Methods for Sarcopenia in Community-Dwelling Older Persons.

机构信息

Xiang Ya Nursing School, The Central South University, Changsha, China.

Department of Geriatrics, The Second Xiangya Hospital of Central South University, Changsha, China.

出版信息

J Am Med Dir Assoc. 2021 Apr;22(4):746-750.e1. doi: 10.1016/j.jamda.2020.05.041. Epub 2020 Jul 12.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

The 2019 Asian Working Group on Sarcopenia in Older People (AWGS 2019) recommends using either calf circumference or the strength, assistance in walking, rising from a chair, climbing stairs, and falls (SARC-F) or SARC-F combined with calf circumference (SARC-CalF) questionnaires for sarcopenia screening. The aim of this study was to compare the ability and applicability of calf circumference, SARC-F, and SARC-CalF for screening sarcopenia among community-dwelling older adults.

DESIGN

Cross-sectional study.

SETTING AND PARTICIPANTS

A total of 1050 community-dwelling older people were enrolled.

METHODS

Sarcopenia was diagnosed according to the AWGS 2019 criteria: bioimpedance analysis for appendicular skeletal muscle index, hand grip, and 6-m gait speed test. Participants also completed the SARC-F questionnaire and calf circumference measurement. The screening tools' performances were evaluated through receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves, area under the ROC curves (AUC), and sensitivity/specificity analyses.

RESULTS

Sarcopenia was identified in 263 (25.0%) participants by the AWGS 2019 criteria. Calf circumference had a sensitivity of 81.4% and a specificity of 77.0%. Sensitivity and specificity of SARC-F for screening sarcopenia were 17.9% and 93.7%, respectively. SARC-CalF improved the sensitivity of SARC-F (47.5%) while keeping similar specificity (92.0%). The AUCs of calf circumference, SARC-F, and SARC-CalF were 0.79 [95% confidence interval (CI), 0.77-0.82], 0.56 (95% CI, 0.52-0.59), and 0.70 (95% CI, 0.67-0.73), respectively. The differences across ROC curves were statistically significant among 3 screening tools (P < .001).

CONCLUSIONS AND IMPLICATIONS

The overall screening ability of calf circumference was better than that of SARC-F and SARC-CalF for sarcopenia in community-dwelling older persons despite gender, age, and cognitive function. SARC-F and SARC-CalF have high specificity but are susceptible to the preceding factors.

摘要

目的

2019 年亚洲老年人肌肉减少症工作组(AWGS 2019)建议使用小腿围或力量、行走辅助、从椅子上站起来、爬楼梯和跌倒(SARC-F)或 SARC-F 联合小腿围(SARC-CalF)问卷进行肌肉减少症筛查。本研究旨在比较小腿围、SARC-F 和 SARC-CalF 筛查社区老年人肌肉减少症的能力和适用性。

设计

横断面研究。

地点和参与者

共纳入 1050 名社区居住的老年人。

方法

根据 AWGS 2019 标准诊断肌肉减少症:四肢骨骼肌指数的生物阻抗分析、握力和 6 米步行速度测试。参与者还完成了 SARC-F 问卷和小腿围测量。通过受试者工作特征(ROC)曲线、ROC 曲线下面积(AUC)和敏感性/特异性分析评估筛查工具的性能。

结果

根据 AWGS 2019 标准,263 名(25.0%)参与者被诊断为肌肉减少症。小腿围的敏感性为 81.4%,特异性为 77.0%。SARC-F 筛查肌肉减少症的敏感性和特异性分别为 17.9%和 93.7%。SARC-CalF 提高了 SARC-F 的敏感性(47.5%),同时保持了相似的特异性(92.0%)。小腿围、SARC-F 和 SARC-CalF 的 AUC 分别为 0.79(95%置信区间[CI],0.77-0.82)、0.56(95% CI,0.52-0.59)和 0.70(95% CI,0.67-0.73)。3 种筛查工具的 ROC 曲线之间的差异具有统计学意义(P<0.001)。

结论和意义

尽管存在性别、年龄和认知功能因素,但与 SARC-F 和 SARC-CalF 相比,小腿围对社区居住老年人肌肉减少症的整体筛查能力更好。SARC-F 和 SARC-CalF 特异性高,但易受上述因素影响。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验