Xiang Ya Nursing School, The Central South University, Changsha, China.
Department of Geriatrics, The Second Xiangya Hospital of Central South University, Changsha, China.
J Am Med Dir Assoc. 2021 Apr;22(4):746-750.e1. doi: 10.1016/j.jamda.2020.05.041. Epub 2020 Jul 12.
The 2019 Asian Working Group on Sarcopenia in Older People (AWGS 2019) recommends using either calf circumference or the strength, assistance in walking, rising from a chair, climbing stairs, and falls (SARC-F) or SARC-F combined with calf circumference (SARC-CalF) questionnaires for sarcopenia screening. The aim of this study was to compare the ability and applicability of calf circumference, SARC-F, and SARC-CalF for screening sarcopenia among community-dwelling older adults.
Cross-sectional study.
A total of 1050 community-dwelling older people were enrolled.
Sarcopenia was diagnosed according to the AWGS 2019 criteria: bioimpedance analysis for appendicular skeletal muscle index, hand grip, and 6-m gait speed test. Participants also completed the SARC-F questionnaire and calf circumference measurement. The screening tools' performances were evaluated through receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves, area under the ROC curves (AUC), and sensitivity/specificity analyses.
Sarcopenia was identified in 263 (25.0%) participants by the AWGS 2019 criteria. Calf circumference had a sensitivity of 81.4% and a specificity of 77.0%. Sensitivity and specificity of SARC-F for screening sarcopenia were 17.9% and 93.7%, respectively. SARC-CalF improved the sensitivity of SARC-F (47.5%) while keeping similar specificity (92.0%). The AUCs of calf circumference, SARC-F, and SARC-CalF were 0.79 [95% confidence interval (CI), 0.77-0.82], 0.56 (95% CI, 0.52-0.59), and 0.70 (95% CI, 0.67-0.73), respectively. The differences across ROC curves were statistically significant among 3 screening tools (P < .001).
The overall screening ability of calf circumference was better than that of SARC-F and SARC-CalF for sarcopenia in community-dwelling older persons despite gender, age, and cognitive function. SARC-F and SARC-CalF have high specificity but are susceptible to the preceding factors.
2019 年亚洲老年人肌肉减少症工作组(AWGS 2019)建议使用小腿围或力量、行走辅助、从椅子上站起来、爬楼梯和跌倒(SARC-F)或 SARC-F 联合小腿围(SARC-CalF)问卷进行肌肉减少症筛查。本研究旨在比较小腿围、SARC-F 和 SARC-CalF 筛查社区老年人肌肉减少症的能力和适用性。
横断面研究。
共纳入 1050 名社区居住的老年人。
根据 AWGS 2019 标准诊断肌肉减少症:四肢骨骼肌指数的生物阻抗分析、握力和 6 米步行速度测试。参与者还完成了 SARC-F 问卷和小腿围测量。通过受试者工作特征(ROC)曲线、ROC 曲线下面积(AUC)和敏感性/特异性分析评估筛查工具的性能。
根据 AWGS 2019 标准,263 名(25.0%)参与者被诊断为肌肉减少症。小腿围的敏感性为 81.4%,特异性为 77.0%。SARC-F 筛查肌肉减少症的敏感性和特异性分别为 17.9%和 93.7%。SARC-CalF 提高了 SARC-F 的敏感性(47.5%),同时保持了相似的特异性(92.0%)。小腿围、SARC-F 和 SARC-CalF 的 AUC 分别为 0.79(95%置信区间[CI],0.77-0.82)、0.56(95% CI,0.52-0.59)和 0.70(95% CI,0.67-0.73)。3 种筛查工具的 ROC 曲线之间的差异具有统计学意义(P<0.001)。
尽管存在性别、年龄和认知功能因素,但与 SARC-F 和 SARC-CalF 相比,小腿围对社区居住老年人肌肉减少症的整体筛查能力更好。SARC-F 和 SARC-CalF 特异性高,但易受上述因素影响。