Department of Psychology.
Psychol Bull. 2020 Sep;146(9):721-764. doi: 10.1037/bul0000270. Epub 2020 Aug 3.
Life history theory argues that exposure to early life adversity (ELA) accelerates development, although existing evidence for this varies. We present a meta-analysis and systematic review testing the hypothesis that ELA involving threat (e.g., violence exposure) will be associated with accelerated biological aging across multiple metrics, whereas exposure to deprivation (e.g., neglect, institutional rearing) and low-socioeconomic status (SES) will not. We meta-analyze 54 studies ( = 116,010) examining associations of ELA with pubertal timing and cellular aging (telomere length and DNA methylation age), systematically review 25 studies ( = 3,253) examining ELA and neural markers of accelerated development (cortical thickness and amygdala-prefrontal cortex functional connectivity) and evaluate whether associations of ELA with biological aging vary according to the nature of adversity experienced. ELA overall was associated with accelerated pubertal timing ( = -0.10) and cellular aging ( = -0.21), but these associations varied by adversity type. Moderator analysis revealed that ELA characterized by threat was associated with accelerated pubertal development ( = -0.26) and accelerated cellular aging ( = -0.43), but deprivation and SES were unrelated to accelerated development. Systematic review revealed associations between ELA and accelerated cortical thinning, with threat-related ELA consistently associated with thinning in ventromedial prefrontal cortex, and deprivation and SES associated with thinning in frontoparietal, default, and visual networks. There was no consistent association of ELA with amygdala-PFC connectivity. These findings suggest specificity in the types of early environmental experiences associated with accelerated biological aging and highlight the importance of evaluating how accelerated aging contributes to health disparities and whether this process can be mitigated through early intervention. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2020 APA, all rights reserved).
生命史理论认为,早期生活逆境(ELA)会加速发展,尽管现有证据存在差异。我们提出了一个元分析和系统综述,以检验以下假设:涉及威胁的 ELA(例如,暴力暴露)将与多个指标的生物衰老加速相关,而遭受剥夺(例如,忽视、机构抚养)和低社会经济地位(SES)则不会。我们对 54 项研究进行了元分析(n=116010),以检验 ELA 与青春期开始和细胞衰老(端粒长度和 DNA 甲基化年龄)的关系,系统综述了 25 项研究(n=3253),以检验 ELA 与加速发育的神经标志物(大脑皮质厚度和杏仁核-前额叶皮层功能连接)的关系,并评估 ELA 与生物衰老的关联是否因所经历逆境的性质而异。总的来说,ELA 与青春期开始加速(β=-0.10)和细胞衰老加速(β=-0.21)相关,但这些关联因逆境类型而异。调节分析显示,以威胁为特征的 ELA 与青春期发育加速(β=-0.26)和细胞衰老加速(β=-0.43)相关,但剥夺和 SES 与加速发展无关。系统综述显示 ELA 与加速大脑皮层变薄之间存在关联,与威胁相关的 ELA 与腹内侧前额叶皮层的变薄始终相关,而剥夺和 SES 与额顶叶、默认和视觉网络的变薄相关。ELA 与杏仁核-前额叶皮层连接之间没有一致的关联。这些发现表明,与加速生物衰老相关的早期环境经历类型具有特异性,并强调了评估加速衰老对健康差异的贡献以及是否可以通过早期干预来减轻这一过程的重要性。(PsycInfo 数据库记录(c)2020 APA,保留所有权利)。