Stanford Prevention Research Center, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, CA, USA.
Quantitative Sciences Unit, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, CA, USA.
Am J Clin Nutr. 2020 Nov 11;112(5):1188-1199. doi: 10.1093/ajcn/nqaa203.
Despite the rising popularity of plant-based alternative meats, there is limited evidence of the health effects of these products.
We aimed to compare the effect of consuming plant-based alternative meat (Plant) as opposed to animal meat (Animal) on health factors. The primary outcome was fasting serum trimethylamine-N-oxide (TMAO). Secondary outcomes included fasting insulin-like growth factor 1, lipids, glucose, insulin, blood pressure, and weight.
SWAP-MEAT (The Study With Appetizing Plantfood-Meat Eating Alternatives Trial) was a single-site, randomized crossover trial with no washout period. Participants received Plant and Animal products, dietary counseling, lab assessments, microbiome assessments (16S), and anthropometric measurements. Participants were instructed to consume ≥2 servings/d of Plant compared with Animal for 8 wk each, while keeping all other foods and beverages as similar as possible between the 2 phases.
The 36 participants who provided complete data for both crossover phases included 67% women, were 69% Caucasian, had a mean ± SD age 50 ± 14 y, and BMI 28 ± 5 kg/m2. Mean ± SD servings per day were not different by intervention sequence: 2.5 ± 0.6 compared with 2.6 ± 0.7 for Plant and Animal, respectively (P = 0.76). Mean ± SEM TMAO concentrations were significantly lower overall for Plant (2.7 ± 0.3) than for Animal (4.7 ± 0.9) (P = 0.012), but a significant order effect was observed (P = 0.023). TMAO concentrations were significantly lower for Plant among the n = 18 who received Plant second (2.9 ± 0.4 compared with 6.4 ± 1.5, Plant compared with Animal, P = 0.007), but not for the n = 18 who received Plant first (2.5 ± 0.4 compared with 3.0 ± 0.6, Plant compared with Animal, P = 0.23). Exploratory analyses of the microbiome failed to reveal possible responder compared with nonresponder factors. Mean ± SEM LDL-cholesterol concentrations (109.9 ± 4.5 compared with 120.7 ± 4.5 mg/dL, P = 0.002) and weight (78.7 ± 3.0 compared with 79.6 ± 3.0 kg, P < 0.001) were lower during the Plant phase.
Among generally healthy adults, contrasting Plant with Animal intake, while keeping all other dietary components similar, the Plant products improved several cardiovascular disease risk factors, including TMAO; there were no adverse effects on risk factors from the Plant products.This trial was registered at clinicaltrials.gov as NCT03718988.
尽管植物性替代肉类越来越受欢迎,但关于这些产品对健康影响的证据有限。
我们旨在比较食用植物性替代肉(植物)与食用动物肉(动物)对健康因素的影响。主要结局指标是空腹血清三甲胺 N-氧化物(TMAO)。次要结局指标包括空腹胰岛素样生长因子 1、血脂、血糖、胰岛素、血压和体重。
SWAP-MEAT(有吸引力的植物性食物-肉类替代试验的研究)是一项单站点、随机交叉试验,无洗脱期。参与者接受植物和动物产品、饮食咨询、实验室评估、微生物组评估(16S)和人体测量。参与者被指示在 8 周的每个阶段分别摄入≥2 份/d 的植物和动物产品,同时在 2 个阶段之间尽可能保持其他食物和饮料相似。
36 名参与者在 2 个交叉阶段均提供了完整的数据,其中 67%为女性,69%为白种人,平均年龄为 50 ± 14 岁,BMI 为 28 ± 5 kg/m2。按干预顺序,平均每日摄入量无差异:植物 2.5 ± 0.6 份,动物 2.6 ± 0.7 份(P = 0.76)。植物的 TMAO 浓度总体显著低于动物(分别为 2.7 ± 0.3 和 4.7 ± 0.9)(P = 0.012),但观察到显著的顺序效应(P = 0.023)。在接受植物作为第二组干预的 n = 18 名参与者中,TMAO 浓度显著较低(植物组 2.9 ± 0.4 与动物组 6.4 ± 1.5,P = 0.007),但在接受植物作为第一组干预的 n = 18 名参与者中,TMAO 浓度无显著差异(植物组 2.5 ± 0.4 与动物组 3.0 ± 0.6,P = 0.23)。对微生物组的探索性分析未能发现可能的反应者与非反应者因素之间的差异。植物组的 LDL 胆固醇浓度(109.9 ± 4.5 与 120.7 ± 4.5 mg/dL,P = 0.002)和体重(78.7 ± 3.0 与 79.6 ± 3.0 kg,P < 0.001)在植物阶段较低。
在一般健康成年人中,对比植物与动物的摄入,同时保持其他饮食成分相似,植物产品改善了包括 TMAO 在内的几种心血管疾病风险因素;植物产品对风险因素没有不良影响。这项试验在 clinicaltrials.gov 上注册为 NCT03718988。