Suppr超能文献

与隐形眼镜相关的角膜炎分离株对多功能消毒溶液、消毒剂和抗生素的敏感性。

Susceptibility of Contact Lens-Related Keratitis Isolates to Multipurpose Disinfecting Solutions, Disinfectants, and Antibiotics.

作者信息

Khan Mahjabeen, Stapleton Fiona, Willcox Mark Duncan Perry

机构信息

School of Optometry and Vision Science, University of New South Wales, Sydney, Australia.

出版信息

Transl Vis Sci Technol. 2020 Apr 9;9(5):2. doi: 10.1167/tvst.9.5.2. eCollection 2020 Apr.

Abstract

PURPOSE

This study analyzed the susceptibilities of 17 contact lens (CL)-related keratitis isolates of from Australia to antibiotics, multipurpose contact lens disinfecting solutions (MPDS), and disinfectants through minimum inhibitory (MIC) and minimum bactericidal concentrations.

METHODS

Antibiotics included ciprofloxacin, levofloxacin, gentamicin, tobramycin, piperacillin, imipenem, ceftazidime, and polymyxin B. The MPDS OPTI-FREE PureMoist, Complete RevitaLens OcuTec, Biotrue, and Renu Advanced Formula and the constituent disinfectants; alexidine dihydrochloride, polyquaternium-1, polyaminopropyl biguanide, and myristamidopropyl dimethylamine (Aldox) were analyzed. The combined susceptibility of disinfectants based on the MPDS formulation was assessed through fractional inhibitory concentration.

RESULTS

All isolates were susceptible to levofloxacin and gentamicin, 2/17 were resistant to ciprofloxacin; 1/17 was resistant to tobramycin, piperacillin, and polymyxin; and 3/17 were resistant to ceftazidime whereas 12/17 were resistant to imipenem. Of the four MPDSs, for Renu Advanced Formula 8/17 strains have an MIC ≤ 11.36 for OPTI-FREE PureMoist 14/17 strains have an MIC ≤ 11.36% for Complete RevitaLens 9/17 strains have an MIC ≤ 11.36, and for Biotrue 5/17 strains have MIC = 11.36. All strains were killed by 100% MPDS. At the concentrations used in the MPDSs, individual disinfectants were not active. From three tested isolates, no synergy was found in dual combinations of disinfectants. However, synergy was found for triple combination of disinfectants for three tested strains.

CONCLUSIONS

Australian CL-related isolates of were susceptible to most antibiotics. There was variability in susceptibility to different MPDS. Individual disinfectant excipients had limited activity. The combination of the disinfectants showed synergy, antagonism, and no interaction.

TRANSLATIONAL RELEVANCE

This study will help to choose better preventive and treatment measures for microbial keratitis.

摘要

目的

本研究通过最小抑菌浓度(MIC)和最小杀菌浓度,分析了从澳大利亚分离出的17株与隐形眼镜(CL)相关的角膜炎菌株对多种抗生素、多功能隐形眼镜消毒溶液(MPDS)和消毒剂的敏感性。

方法

抗生素包括环丙沙星、左氧氟沙星、庆大霉素、妥布霉素、哌拉西林、亚胺培南、头孢他啶和多粘菌素B。对MPDS OPTI-FREE PureMoist、Complete RevitaLens OcuTec、Biotrue和Renu Advanced Formula以及其成分消毒剂,如二盐酸阿利西定、聚季铵盐-1、聚氨基丙基双胍和肉豆蔻酰胺丙基二甲基胺(Aldox)进行了分析。基于MPDS配方评估消毒剂的联合敏感性,采用部分抑菌浓度法。

结果

所有菌株对左氧氟沙星和庆大霉素敏感,2/17对环丙沙星耐药;1/17对妥布霉素、哌拉西林和多粘菌素耐药;3/17对头孢他啶耐药,而12/17对亚胺培南耐药。在四种MPDS中,对于Renu Advanced Formula,8/17菌株的MIC≤11.36;对于OPTI-FREE PureMoist,14/17菌株的MIC≤11.36%;对于Complete RevitaLens,9/17菌株的MIC≤11.36;对于Biotrue,5/17菌株的MIC = 11.36。所有菌株均被100%的MPDS杀灭。在MPDS中使用的浓度下,单独的消毒剂无活性。从三个测试菌株中,未发现消毒剂二元组合有协同作用。然而,在三个测试菌株中,发现消毒剂三元组合有协同作用。

结论

澳大利亚与CL相关的分离菌株对大多数抗生素敏感。对不同MPDS的敏感性存在差异。单独的消毒剂辅料活性有限。消毒剂组合显示出协同、拮抗和无相互作用。

转化意义

本研究将有助于为微生物性角膜炎选择更好的预防和治疗措施。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f725/7401903/3df35fbc9a46/tvst-9-5-2-f001.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验