National Library of Medicine and the National Institute of Dental and Craniofacial Research, National Institute of Health, Bethesda, Maryland, USA.
National Institute of Dental and Craniofacial Research and National Institute of Health, Bethesda, Maryland, USA.
Periodontol 2000. 2020 Oct;84(1):202-214. doi: 10.1111/prd.12337.
Upwards of 1 in 10 adults worldwide may be affected by severe periodontitis, making the disease more prevalent than cardiovascular disease. Despite its global scope, its impact on pain, oral function, and the wellbeing of individuals, and the disproportionate burden of disease and the socioeconomic impact on communities, the perception that periodontal disease is a public health problem remains low. Although there have been substantial improvements in our understanding of the etiology of periodontal disease and how we can prevent and control it, these advances have been primarily focused on individual, patient-focused approaches. The prevention of periodontal disease depends on improving currently available individual interventions and on determining what public health interventions can be effective and sustainable under real-life conditions. Currently, public health approaches for periodontal disease prevention and control are lacking. This review traces the historical strategies for prevention of periodontal disease in an epidemiologic transition context, using a modified model developed for cardiovascular disease, and presents a possible public health approach. Improving periodontal disease prevention and control will need to take into consideration the core activities of a public health approach: assessment, policy development, and assurance.
全世界有超过 10%的成年人可能受到严重牙周炎的影响,使这种疾病比心血管疾病更为普遍。尽管牙周炎具有全球性,但人们对其导致的疼痛、口腔功能和个人健康的影响,以及疾病负担的不均衡和对社区的社会经济影响认识不足,仍将其视为一个公共卫生问题。尽管我们对牙周病的病因及其预防和控制方法有了很大的了解,但这些进展主要集中在以个体为中心、以患者为中心的方法上。预防牙周病取决于改善目前可用的个体干预措施,并确定在现实生活条件下哪些公共卫生干预措施可以有效和可持续。目前,牙周病预防和控制的公共卫生方法还很缺乏。本综述追溯了在流行病学转变背景下预防牙周病的历史策略,使用为心血管疾病开发的改良模型,并提出了一种可能的公共卫生方法。改善牙周病的预防和控制需要考虑公共卫生方法的核心活动:评估、政策制定和保证。