Mental Health Foundation, London, UK.
Queen's University Belfast, Belfast, UK.
Health Expect. 2020 Dec;23(6):1579-1593. doi: 10.1111/hex.13141. Epub 2020 Oct 9.
People with severe mental illness (SMI) often have poorer physical health than the general population. A coproduced physical activity intervention to improve physical activity for people with SMI in Northern Ireland was evaluated by co-researchers (researchers with lived experience of SMI) and academic researchers using a new approach to participatory data analysis called participatory theme elicitation (PTE).
Co-researchers and academic researchers analysed the data from the pilot study using PTE. This paper aimed to compare these analyses to validate the findings of the study and explore the validity of the PTE method in the context of the evaluation of a physical activity intervention for individuals with SMI.
There was alignment and congruence of some themes across groups. Important differences in the analyses across groups included the use of language, with the co-researchers employing less academic and clinical language, and structure of themes generated, with the academic researchers including subthemes under some umbrella themes.
The comparison of analyses supports the validity of the PTE approach, which is a meaningful way of involving people with lived experience in research. PTE addresses the power imbalances that are often present in the analysis process and was found to be acceptable by co-researchers and academic researchers alike.
患有严重精神疾病(SMI)的人往往比一般人群的身体健康状况更差。一种由共同研究者(有 SMI 生活经历的研究人员)和学术研究人员共同制作的身体活动干预措施,旨在提高北爱尔兰 SMI 患者的身体活动水平,该措施采用了一种新的参与式数据分析方法,即参与式主题抽取(PTE)进行了评估。
共同研究者和学术研究人员使用 PTE 对试点研究的数据进行了分析。本文旨在通过比较这些分析,验证研究结果,并探讨 PTE 方法在评估针对 SMI 个体的身体活动干预措施方面的有效性。
在某些主题上,不同群体之间存在一致性和一致性。在不同群体的分析中,存在一些重要的差异,包括语言的使用,共同研究者使用的语言不那么学术化和临床化,以及生成的主题结构,学术研究者在一些主题下包含子主题。
分析的比较支持 PTE 方法的有效性,这是一种让有生活经验的人参与研究的有意义的方式。PTE 解决了分析过程中经常存在的权力不平衡问题,并且得到了共同研究者和学术研究人员的认可。