Evans Center for Implementation and Improvement Sciences, Department of Medicine, Boston University School of Medicine, Boston, Massachusetts, USA.
Department of Health Law, Policy and Management, Boston University School of Public Health, Boston, Massachusetts, USA.
J Eval Clin Pract. 2021 Aug;27(4):965-975. doi: 10.1111/jep.13496. Epub 2020 Oct 16.
RATIONALE, AIMS AND OBJECTIVES: Missed appointments are a persistent problem across healthcare settings, and result in negative outcomes for providers and patients. We aimed to review and evaluate the effectiveness of interventions designed to reduce missed appointments in safety net settings.
We conducted a systematic review of interventions reported in three electronic databases. Data extraction and quality assessment were conducted according to PRISMA guidelines. Eligible studies were analyzed qualitatively to describe intervention types. A random effects model was used to measure the pooled relative risk of appointment adherence across interventions in the meta-analysis.
Thirty-four studies met inclusion criteria for the qualitative synthesis, and 21 studies reported sufficient outcome data for inclusion in the meta-analysis. Qualitative analysis classified nine types of interventions used to increase attendance; however, application of each intervention type varied widely between studies. Across all study types (N = 12 000), RR was 1.08, (95% CI 1.03, 1.13) for any intervention used to increase appointment attendance. No single intervention was clearly effective: facilitated appointment scheduling [RR = 3.31 (95% CI: 0.30, 37.13)], financial incentives [RR = 1.88 (0.73, 4.82)] case management/patient navigator [RR = 1.09, (0.96, 1.24)], text messages [RR = 1.02 (0.96, 1.08)], transportation, [RR = 1.05 (0.98, 1.13)], telephone reminder calls [RR 1.12, (0.87, 1.45)], in-person referrals, [RR = 1.01 (0.90, 1.13)], patient contracts [RR = 0.87 (0.52, 1.46)] or combined strategies, [RR = 1.16 (1.03, 1.32)]. No strategy was clearly superior to others, p interaction = .50.
Strategies to improve appointment adherence in safety net hospitals varied widely and were only modestly effective. Further research harmonizing intervention delivery within each strategy and comparing strategies with the most potential for success is needed.
背景、目的和目标:错过预约是医疗保健环境中普遍存在的问题,会给提供者和患者带来负面后果。我们旨在回顾和评估旨在减少安全网环境中预约流失的干预措施的有效性。
我们对三个电子数据库中报告的干预措施进行了系统评价。根据 PRISMA 指南进行数据提取和质量评估。对合格研究进行定性分析以描述干预类型。在荟萃分析中,使用随机效应模型测量干预措施对预约依从性的汇总相对风险。
34 项研究符合定性综合的纳入标准,21 项研究报告了足够的结局数据纳入荟萃分析。定性分析将九种用于增加就诊率的干预措施分类;然而,在研究之间,每种干预措施的应用差异很大。在所有研究类型(N=12000)中,任何用于增加预约就诊率的干预措施的 RR 为 1.08(95%CI 1.03,1.13)。没有一种干预措施明显有效:便利预约安排[RR=3.31(95%CI:0.30,37.13)]、经济激励[RR=1.88(0.73,4.82)]、病例管理/患者导航[RR=1.09(0.96,1.24)]、短信[RR=1.02(0.96,1.08)]、交通[RR=1.05(0.98,1.13)]、电话提醒[RR 1.12,(0.87,1.45)]、当面转介[RR=1.01(0.90,1.13)]、患者合同[RR=0.87(0.52,1.46)]或联合策略[RR=1.16(1.03,1.32)]。没有一种策略明显优于其他策略,p 交互=0.50。
在安全网医院中提高预约依从性的策略差异很大,效果也只是适度。需要进一步研究协调每个策略中的干预措施的提供,并比较最有可能成功的策略。