College of Nursing, University of South Carolina, Columbia, South Carolina.
College of Nursing, Washington State University, Spokane, Washington.
J Rural Health. 2022 Jan;38(1):187-193. doi: 10.1111/jrh.12535. Epub 2020 Nov 12.
Rural residents may be at higher risk for loneliness than urban residents due to factors such as social isolation, poorer health, and socioeconomic disadvantage. To date, there have been few studies examining rural-urban differences in loneliness among adults in the United States. We examined differences in loneliness across the rural-urban continuum among adult residents living in Washington State.
Stratified random sampling was used to select 2,575 adults from small rural, large rural, suburban, and urban areas who were invited to complete a survey on factors affecting health. Data were obtained from 616 adults (278 from small rural, 100 from large rural, 98 from suburban, and 140 from urban areas) from June 2018 through October 2019. Loneliness was measured using the UCLA Loneliness Scale (3rd version). Multivariable linear and logistic regressions were used to examine geographic differences in loneliness (measured continuously and dichotomously).
Mean unadjusted loneliness scores were lower in suburban compared to urban areas (35.06 vs 38.57, P = .03). The prevalence of loneliness was 50.7%, 59.0%, 40.8%, and 54.3% in small rural, large rural, suburban, and urban areas, respectively. Suburban living was associated with lower odds for being lonely compared to urban living (unadjusted OR = 0.58; 95% CI = 0.34-0.98), but this association was not statistically significant in the adjusted model (OR = 0.63; 95% CI = 0.33-1.19).
Loneliness is a prevalent health issue across the rural-urban continuum among Washington State adults.
由于社会隔离、健康状况较差和社会经济劣势等因素,农村居民可能比城市居民更容易感到孤独。迄今为止,很少有研究调查美国成年人中农村与城市之间孤独感的差异。我们研究了居住在华盛顿州的成年居民在农村-城市连续体上的孤独感差异。
采用分层随机抽样的方法,从小型农村、大型农村、郊区和城市地区选取了 2575 名成年人,邀请他们完成一项关于影响健康的因素的调查。数据来自 2018 年 6 月至 2019 年 10 月期间的 616 名成年人(小型农村地区 278 人,大型农村地区 100 人,郊区 98 人,城市地区 140 人)。使用加州大学洛杉矶分校孤独量表(第 3 版)测量孤独感。多变量线性和逻辑回归用于检查孤独感的地理差异(连续和二分测量)。
调整前,郊区的孤独感得分明显低于城市地区(35.06 分比 38.57 分,P =.03)。小型农村、大型农村、郊区和城市地区的孤独感患病率分别为 50.7%、59.0%、40.8%和 54.3%。与城市居住相比,郊区居住与孤独感的可能性较低相关(未调整的 OR = 0.58;95% CI = 0.34-0.98),但在调整模型中这种相关性无统计学意义(OR = 0.63;95% CI = 0.33-1.19)。
在华盛顿州成年人的农村-城市连续体中,孤独感是一个普遍存在的健康问题。