Annenberg School for Communication, University of Pennsylvania.
Health Commun. 2021 Jan;36(1):6-14. doi: 10.1080/10410236.2020.1847437. Epub 2020 Nov 22.
Wide-spread misinformation about the COVID-19 pandemic has presented challenges for communicating public health recommendations. Should campaigns to promote protective behaviors focus on debunking misinformation or targeting behavior-specific beliefs? To address this question, we examine whether belief in COVID-19 misinformation is directly associated with two behaviors (face mask wearing and social distancing), and whether behavior-specific beliefs can account for this association and better predict behavior, consistent with behavior-change theory. We conducted a nationally representative two-wave survey of U.S. adults from 5/26/20-6/12/20 ( = 1074) and 7/15/20-7/21//20 ( = 889; follow-up response 83%). Scales were developed and validated for COVID-19 related misinformation beliefs, social distancing and face mask wearing, and beliefs about the consequences of both behaviors. Cross-lagged panel linear regression models assessed relationships among the variables. While belief in misinformation was negatively associated with both face mask wearing (B = -.27, SE =.06) and social-distancing behaviors (B = -.46, SE =.08) measured at the same time, misinformation did not predict concurrent or lagged behavior when the behavior-specific beliefs were incorporated in the models. Beliefs about behavioral outcomes accounted for face mask wearing and social distancing, both cross-sectionally (B =.43, SE =.05; B =.63, SE =.09) and lagged over time (B =.20, SE = 04; B =.30, SE =.08). In conclusion, belief in COVID-19-related misinformation is less relevant to protective behaviors, but beliefs about the consequences of these behaviors are important predictors. With regard to misinformation, we recommend health campaigns aimed at promoting protective behaviors emphasize the benefits of these behaviors, rather than debunking unrelated false claims.
关于 COVID-19 大流行的广泛错误信息给传达公共卫生建议带来了挑战。推广保护性行为的活动应该专注于揭穿错误信息还是针对特定行为的信念?为了解决这个问题,我们研究了对 COVID-19 错误信息的信念是否与两种行为(戴口罩和保持社交距离)直接相关,以及特定行为的信念是否可以解释这种关联并更好地预测行为,这与行为改变理论一致。我们对美国成年人进行了一项全国性的两波调查,调查时间分别为 5 月 26 日至 6 月 12 日(=1074 人)和 7 月 15 日至 7 月 21 日(=889 人;后续回应率为 83%)。针对 COVID-19 相关错误信息信念、社交距离和戴口罩以及对这两种行为后果的信念,开发和验证了量表。交叉滞后面板线性回归模型评估了变量之间的关系。虽然同时测量时,对错误信息的信念与戴口罩(B=-.27,SE=.06)和保持社交距离行为(B=-.46,SE=.08)呈负相关,但当模型中纳入特定行为的信念时,错误信息并没有预测同时或滞后的行为。关于行为结果的信念解释了口罩佩戴和社交距离,无论是在横截面(B=.43,SE=.05;B=.63,SE=.09)还是随时间滞后(B=.20,SE=.04;B=.30,SE=.08)。总之,对 COVID-19 相关错误信息的信念与保护性行为的相关性较小,但这些行为后果的信念是重要的预测因素。关于错误信息,我们建议以促进保护性行为为目的的健康宣传活动强调这些行为的好处,而不是揭穿无关的虚假说法。