Barts Health NHS Trust and the Royal Free NHS Foundation Trust, Barts Cancer Institute, and Queen Mary University of London, London UK.
Fox Chase Cancer Center, Philadelphia, PA, USA.
Lancet Oncol. 2020 Dec;21(12):1563-1573. doi: 10.1016/S1470-2045(20)30436-8. Epub 2020 Oct 23.
The first interim analysis of the KEYNOTE-426 study showed superior efficacy of pembrolizumab plus axitinib over sunitinib monotherapy in treatment-naive, advanced renal cell carcinoma. The exploratory analysis with extended follow-up reported here aims to assess long-term efficacy and safety of pembrolizumab plus axitinib versus sunitinib monotherapy in patients with advanced renal cell carcinoma.
In the ongoing, randomised, open-label, phase 3 KEYNOTE-426 study, adults (≥18 years old) with treatment-naive, advanced renal cell carcinoma with clear cell histology were enrolled in 129 sites (hospitals and cancer centres) across 16 countries. Patients were randomly assigned (1:1) to receive 200 mg pembrolizumab intravenously every 3 weeks for up to 35 cycles plus 5 mg axitinib orally twice daily or 50 mg sunitinib monotherapy orally once daily for 4 weeks per 6-week cycle. Randomisation was done using an interactive voice response system or integrated web response system, and was stratified by International Metastatic Renal Cell Carcinoma Database Consortium risk status and geographical region. Primary endpoints were overall survival and progression-free survival in the intention-to-treat population. Since the primary endpoints were met at the first interim analysis, updated data are reported with nominal p values. This study is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT02853331.
Between Oct 24, 2016, and Jan 24, 2018, 861 patients were randomly assigned to receive pembrolizumab plus axitinib (n=432) or sunitinib monotherapy (n=429). With a median follow-up of 30·6 months (IQR 27·2-34·2), continued clinical benefit was observed with pembrolizumab plus axitinib over sunitinib in terms of overall survival (median not reached with pembrolizumab and axitinib vs 35·7 months [95% CI 33·3-not reached] with sunitinib); hazard ratio [HR] 0·68 [95% CI 0·55-0·85], p=0·0003) and progression-free survival (median 15·4 months [12·7-18·9] vs 11·1 months [9·1-12·5]; 0·71 [0·60-0·84], p<0·0001). The most frequent (≥10% patients in either group) treatment-related grade 3 or worse adverse events were hypertension (95 [22%] of 429 patients in the pembrolizumab plus axitinib group vs 84 [20%] of 425 patients in the sunitinib group), alanine aminotransferase increase (54 [13%] vs 11 [3%]), and diarrhoea (46 [11%] vs 23 [5%]). No new treatment-related deaths were reported since the first interim analysis.
With extended study follow-up, results from KEYNOTE-426 show that pembrolizumab plus axitinib continues to have superior clinical outcomes over sunitinib. These results continue to support the first-line treatment with pembrolizumab plus axitinib as the standard of care of advanced renal cell carcinoma.
Merck Sharp & Dohme Corp, a subsidiary of Merck & Co, Inc.
KEYNOTE-426 研究的首次中期分析显示,与舒尼替尼单药治疗相比,帕博利珠单抗联合阿昔替尼在治疗初治的晚期肾细胞癌患者中具有更好的疗效。本探索性分析报告了对晚期肾细胞癌患者进行的帕博利珠单抗联合阿昔替尼与舒尼替尼单药治疗的长期疗效和安全性评估,随访时间有所延长。
在正在进行的、随机、开放标签、III 期 KEYNOTE-426 研究中,16 个国家的 129 个地点(医院和癌症中心)招募了 18 岁及以上、组织学为透明细胞的初治、晚期肾细胞癌患者。患者按 1:1 随机分配接受 200 mg 帕博利珠单抗静脉输注,每 3 周一次,最多 35 个周期,联合每日两次口服 5 mg 阿昔替尼或每日一次口服 50 mg 舒尼替尼,每个 6 周周期治疗 4 周。采用交互式语音应答系统或集成网络应答系统进行随机分组,并根据国际转移性肾细胞癌数据库联盟(IMDC)风险状况和地理位置进行分层。主要终点为在意向治疗人群中的总生存期和无进展生存期。由于在首次中期分析时达到了主要终点,因此更新了数据并采用名义 p 值报告。本研究在 ClinicalTrials.gov 注册,NCT02853331。
2016 年 10 月 24 日至 2018 年 1 月 24 日,861 名患者被随机分配接受帕博利珠单抗联合阿昔替尼(n=432)或舒尼替尼单药治疗(n=429)。中位随访 30.6 个月(IQR 27.2-34.2),与舒尼替尼相比,帕博利珠单抗联合阿昔替尼在总生存期方面持续显示出临床获益(帕博利珠单抗联合阿昔替尼的中位未达到,而舒尼替尼为 35.7 个月[95%CI 33.3-未达到]);风险比[HR] 0.68[95%CI 0.55-0.85],p=0.0003)和无进展生存期(中位 15.4 个月[12.7-18.9] vs 11.1 个月[9.1-12.5];0.71[0.60-0.84],p<0.0001)。最常见(每组≥10%的患者)的与治疗相关的 3 级或更高级别的不良事件是高血压(帕博利珠单抗联合阿昔替尼组 429 例患者中有 95 例[22%],舒尼替尼组 425 例患者中有 84 例[20%])、丙氨酸氨基转移酶升高(54 例[13%] vs 11 例[3%])和腹泻(46 例[11%] vs 23 例[5%])。自首次中期分析以来,没有报告新的与治疗相关的死亡。
随着研究随访时间的延长,KEYNOTE-426 的结果显示,帕博利珠单抗联合阿昔替尼继续在总生存期方面具有优于舒尼替尼的临床疗效。这些结果继续支持将帕博利珠单抗联合阿昔替尼作为晚期肾细胞癌的一线治疗选择,并作为标准治疗方案。
默克公司(Merck Sharp & Dohme Corp),默克公司的子公司,是一家美国与德国合资的国际性制药企业。