Australian Rivers Institute, School of Environment and Science, Griffith University, Southport Qld 4222, Australia.
Australian Rivers Institute, School of Environment and Science, Griffith University, Southport Qld 4222, Australia.
Chemosphere. 2021 Jan;263:128294. doi: 10.1016/j.chemosphere.2020.128294. Epub 2020 Sep 10.
Wastewater treatment plants (WWTPs) have been identified as an important pathway of microplastics to the environment. Most studies have focused on wastewater effluent, but generally only a small fraction of microplastics entering WWTPs are present in treated effluent. Instead, the majority of microplastics are expected to be retained in the sludge. To our knowledge, there is limited information on microplastics in sludge/biosolids from Australian WWTPs, despite 75% of biosolids produced in Australia being used for agriculture. This study evaluated the abundance of microplastics throughout the treatment trains of three WWTPs in Australia. The fate of microplastics >25 μm during treatment and their release to the environment was evaluated using an audit approach. The highest microplastic concentrations were detected in the influent, with fibres the dominant form of microplastic found. The screening and grit removal process preceding primary treatment removed 69-79% of microplastics, with these microplastics transported to landfill. Only 0.2-1.8% of the total microplastics in the influent were present in the final effluent, while 8-16% were retained in biosolids. This equates to between 22.1 × 10 to 133 × 10 microplastic particles per day released in effluent, between 864 × 10 to 1020 × 10 microplastic particles per day in biosolids, and between 4100 × 10 to 9100 × 10 microplastic particles per day transported to landfill. This study shows for the first time that most microplastics are retained during the initial screening and grit removal process with the load of microplastics going to landfill an order of magnitude greater than that in biosolids. Landfills may thus be an important sink (and potential future source) of microplastics from wastewater.
污水处理厂(WWTP)已被确定为微塑料进入环境的重要途径。大多数研究都集中在废水排放上,但进入 WWTP 的微塑料只有一小部分存在于处理后的废水中。相反,大部分微塑料预计会被保留在污泥中。据我们所知,尽管澳大利亚生产的 75%的生物固体用于农业,但澳大利亚的 WWTP 中有关污泥/生物固体中微塑料的信息有限。本研究评估了澳大利亚三个 WWTP 的整个处理过程中微塑料的丰度。使用审核方法评估了微塑料>25μm 在处理过程中的命运及其向环境的释放。微塑料浓度最高的是进水口,发现纤维是微塑料的主要形式。在进行初级处理之前的筛选和砂砾去除过程去除了 69-79%的微塑料,这些微塑料被运到垃圾填埋场。只有 0.2-1.8%的进水口总微塑料存在于最终的废水中,而 8-16%的微塑料被保留在生物固体中。这相当于每天有 22.1×10 到 133×10 个微塑料颗粒从废水中释放,每天有 864×10 到 1020×10 个微塑料颗粒从生物固体中释放,每天有 4100×10 到 9100×10 个微塑料颗粒被运到垃圾填埋场。这项研究首次表明,大多数微塑料在最初的筛选和砂砾去除过程中被截留,运往垃圾填埋场的微塑料负荷比生物固体高一个数量级。因此,垃圾填埋场可能是废水微塑料的一个重要汇(和潜在的未来源)。