Suppr超能文献

健康受试者中,给予贮存型促皮质素注射剂与合成 ACTH 贮存型药物和甲泼尼龙后的类固醇生成暴露比较。

Comparison of Steroidogenic Exposure Following the Administration of Repository Corticotropin Injection With a Synthetic ACTH Depot and Methylprednisolone in Healthy Subjects.

机构信息

Mallinckrodt Pharmaceuticals, Bedminster, New Jersey, USA.

出版信息

Clin Pharmacol Drug Dev. 2021 Jul;10(7):777-788. doi: 10.1002/cpdd.894. Epub 2020 Dec 23.

Abstract

The pharmacokinetics (PK) and pharmacodynamics (PD) of clinically relevant doses of repository corticotropin injection (Acthar Gel) and synthetic ACTH depot have not been fully characterized. We compared the steroidogenic exposure of repository corticotropin injection and synthetic ACTH depot in healthy adults at therapeutic doses using data from 2 separate phase 1 studies. Subjects were randomly assigned to repository corticotropin injection 40 or 80 IU subcutaneously twice weekly or 80 IU subcutaneously 3 times weekly for 15 days or to daily synthetic ACTH depot doses of 0.5 mg subcutaneously, 0.75 mg subcutaneously, 1 mg subcutaneously, or 1 mg intramuscularly for 5 days. A population PK/PD model was developed to simulate the free cortisol exposure of a clinically relevant dose of synthetic ACTH depot (1 mg subcutaneously twice weekly). Study drug doses were converted to methylprednisolone-equivalent doses using the steroidogenic exposure of methylprednisolone 16 mg daily as a conversion factor. Doses were also converted to prednisone equivalents using a coefficient of 1.25. These analyses revealed that the steroidogenic exposure of repository corticotropin injection at clinically relevant doses was substantially lower than that for synthetic ACTH depot. The 3 repository corticotropin injection regimens were equivalent to approximately 5, 8, and 16 mg of daily prednisone, respectively. On the basis of simulated free cortisol exposure, synthetic ACTH depot 1 mg subcutaneously twice weekly was comparable to 57 mg of daily prednisone. These results suggest that repository corticotropin injection has pharmacological effects that cannot be considered identical to synthetic ACTH depot.

摘要

临床上相关剂量的储存型促皮质素注射液(Acthar Gel)和合成 ACTH 储库的药代动力学(PK)和药效动力学(PD)尚未完全确定。我们使用来自 2 项单独的 1 期研究的数据,比较了健康成年人在治疗剂量下接受储存型促皮质素注射液和合成 ACTH 储库的类固醇生成暴露情况。受试者被随机分配接受皮下注射储存型促皮质素注射液 40 或 80IU,每周 2 次,或皮下注射 80IU,每周 3 次,共 15 天,或接受每日皮下注射 0.5mg、0.75mg、1mg 或 1mg 合成 ACTH 储库,连续 5 天。开发了一个群体 PK/PD 模型,以模拟临床上相关剂量的合成 ACTH 储库(每周 2 次皮下注射 1mg)的游离皮质醇暴露情况。研究药物剂量通过将每日甲基强的松龙 16mg 的类固醇生成暴露用作转换因子转换为甲基强的松龙等效剂量。剂量也通过使用 1.25 的系数转换为泼尼松等效物。这些分析表明,临床上相关剂量的储存型促皮质素注射液的类固醇生成暴露量明显低于合成 ACTH 储库。3 种储存型促皮质素注射液方案分别相当于约 5、8 和 16mg 的每日泼尼松。基于模拟的游离皮质醇暴露情况,每周两次皮下注射 1mg 的合成 ACTH 储库与每日 57mg 的泼尼松相当。这些结果表明,储存型促皮质素注射液具有不能被认为与合成 ACTH 储库完全相同的药理作用。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ec1b/8359281/79e9c8671aa5/CPDD-10-777-g001.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验