Suppr超能文献

女性为何比男性长寿的新视角:权力、性别、社会决定因素和资本的探索。

New Perspective on Why Women Live Longer Than Men: An Exploration of Power, Gender, Social Determinants, and Capitals.

机构信息

Southgate Institute for Health, Society & Equity, Flinders University, Adelaide 5042, Australia.

College of Medicine and Public Health, Flinders University, Adelaide 5048, Australia.

出版信息

Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2021 Jan 14;18(2):661. doi: 10.3390/ijerph18020661.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Women live longer than men, even though many of the recognised social determinants of health are worse for women than men. No existing explanations account fully for these differences in life expectancy, although they do highlight the complexity and interaction of biological, social and health service factors.

METHODS

this paper is an exploratory explanation of gendered life expectancy difference (GLED) using a novel combination of epidemiological and sociological methods. We present the global picture of GLED. We then utilise a secondary data comparative case analysis offering explanations for GLED in Australia and Ethiopia. We combine a social determinant of health lens with Bourdieu's concepts of capitals (economic, cultural, symbolic and social).

RESULTS

we confirmed continuing GLED in all countries ranging from less than a year to over 11 years. The Australian and Ethiopian cases demonstrated the complex factors underpinning this difference, highlighting similarities and differences in socioeconomic and cultural factors and how they are gendered within and between the countries. Bourdieu's capitals enabled us to partially explain GLED and to develop a conceptual model of causal pathways.

CONCLUSION

we demonstrate the value of combing a SDH and Bourdieu's capital lens to investigate GLED. We proposed a theoretical framework to guide future research.

摘要

背景

尽管许多公认的健康社会决定因素对女性比对男性更不利,但女性的寿命比男性长。现有的解释并没有完全说明这些预期寿命差异的原因,尽管它们确实突出了生物、社会和卫生服务因素的复杂性和相互作用。

方法

本文使用一种新颖的流行病学和社会学方法组合,对性别预期寿命差异(GLED)进行了探索性解释。我们展示了 GLED 的全球图景。然后,我们利用澳大利亚和埃塞俄比亚的二次数据比较案例分析,为 GLED 提供了一些解释。我们将健康社会决定因素的视角与 Bourdieu 的资本概念(经济、文化、符号和社会)结合起来。

结果

我们证实,所有国家的 GLED 都在持续存在,从不到一年到超过 11 年不等。澳大利亚和埃塞俄比亚的案例说明了支持这种差异的复杂因素,突出了社会经济和文化因素在两国内部和之间的相似性和差异性,以及它们在性别方面的表现。Bourdieu 的资本使我们能够部分解释 GLED,并提出了一个因果关系路径的概念模型。

结论

我们展示了结合健康社会决定因素和 Bourdieu 资本视角来研究 GLED 的价值。我们提出了一个理论框架来指导未来的研究。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2f7a/7829786/6b40c9aca754/ijerph-18-00661-g001.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验